Drumright Nursing Home: Immediate Jeopardy Violations - OK
No law enforcement contact. No safety surveys. No staff education. No new interventions. No quality assurance review. And the resident at the center of multiple incidents, identified in inspection records as Resident #28, had not been seen by a counselor.
The administrator said so themselves.
Inspectors asked about an incident involving Resident #28 and Resident #37 at 6:13 p.m. The administrator confirmed no law enforcement had been contacted. Two minutes later, at 6:15, inspectors asked about a separate incident involving Resident #28 and Resident #33. Same answer. No police. No safe surveys, no education, no QA, no new interventions. One minute after that, at 6:16, inspectors asked about a third incident, this one involving Resident #28 and Resident #41. The administrator gave the same answer again.
Three incidents. Three confirmations. The answers came in a span of three minutes.
At 6:38 p.m., inspectors returned to the question of Resident #28 directly. The administrator confirmed the resident had not been seen by counseling.
The facility received an Immediate Jeopardy citation under F0600, the federal tag covering abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Immediate Jeopardy is the most serious level of harm CMS assigns, reserved for situations where a facility's failures have placed residents in immediate risk of serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death.
What the inspection report does not describe, because its four pages do not contain it, is what happened in those incidents. The identities of Residents #28, #33, #37, and #41 are not disclosed. The nature of what occurred between them is not detailed in the portion of the report available. What the record does show, plainly, is that something happened, that it happened more than once, that it involved the same resident at the center of each event, and that the facility's response was to do nothing documented and tell no one official.
The administrator did not dispute any of it. When asked whether law enforcement was contacted for the incident with Resident #28 and Resident #33, they said "apparently not." When asked again, moments later, about the incident with Resident #28 and Resident #41, they said they did not contact law enforcement. There was no ambiguity in the answers and no indication the administrator was unaware of the incidents. They simply had not acted.
There were no safe surveys conducted to assess whether other residents were at risk. There was no staff education triggered by what happened. There were no new care interventions put in place for anyone involved. The facility's internal quality assurance process, which exists to catch and correct exactly these kinds of failures, was never applied.
Resident #28, who appears in connection with each of the three incidents documented in this report, had received no counseling as of the date inspectors were on site.
The inspection was conducted as a complaint survey, meaning someone, a resident, a family member, a staff member, or another party, contacted regulators before inspectors arrived. The complaint process exists because facilities do not always self-report. In this case, the record suggests the facility was aware of the incidents and chose not to escalate them, not to law enforcement, not through internal safety processes, and not through any formal support for the residents involved.
The Immediate Jeopardy finding was cited as affecting few residents. In federal inspection language, "few" means one to two. The citation covers Residents #28 and the others named alongside them across the three incidents.
Drumright Nursing Home is a small facility in Drumright, a city of roughly 2,800 people in Creek County, about 60 miles northeast of Oklahoma City.
Resident #28 had not been seen by counseling.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Drumright Nursing Home from 2025-09-22 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: September 19, 2026 · Our methodology
Drumright Nursing Home in Drumright, OK was cited for immediate jeopardy violations during a health inspection on September 22, 2025.
And the resident at the center of multiple incidents, identified in inspection records as Resident #28, had not been seen by a counselor.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.