Rochester Residence and Care Center: 37 Deficiencies - PA
The infection control deficiency, catalogued under a category reserved for failures in a facility's prevention and control program, identified a specific breakdown: the home had not ensured its infection prevention program included mandatory training backed by written standards, policies, and procedures. Inspectors classified it as an isolated finding with no documented harm to residents, but with the potential for more than minimal harm.
That potential is not abstract. Nursing homes are environments where infections spread with unusual speed. Residents share dining rooms, common spaces, and caregivers. Many have compromised immune systems, chronic conditions, or wounds that make them vulnerable to pathogens that a healthier person might shake off in a week. When the staff responsible for preventing the spread of infection have not received structured, documented training on how to do that, the gap between policy and practice can close around a resident before anyone notices.
The facility did not dispute the finding. It reported a correction date of October 30, 2025, roughly six weeks after inspectors walked through the door.
But the infection control lapse was one item on a list of 37. Federal inspectors conducting the September 19 complaint inspection documented deficiencies across multiple categories of care. The full scope of those findings, taken together, describes a facility that was out of compliance in ways that touched nearly every corner of its operation.
Thirty-seven deficiencies in a single inspection is a number worth sitting with. Most nursing home inspections turn up some findings — the regulatory process is designed to be rigorous, and even well-run facilities occasionally fall short on documentation or procedural detail. But 37 citations represent a sustained pattern of gaps, not an isolated paperwork error. They reflect what inspectors found when they looked at staffing, care planning, medication management, resident rights, and the physical environment, among other areas. Each deficiency is a place where the facility's practices did not meet the standard its residents were entitled to expect.
The complaint nature of the inspection matters, too. Complaint inspections are typically triggered by concerns raised by residents, family members, or staff, not by a routine scheduling calendar. Someone, or more than one person, contacted regulators before these inspectors arrived. The inspection that followed produced 37 documented failures.
Rochester Residence and Care Center sits in Rochester, a small borough in Beaver County in western Pennsylvania, roughly 25 miles northwest of Pittsburgh. For residents who live there, many of them elderly and dependent on the facility for daily care, the findings from September describe the conditions they were living in.
The infection control training deficiency carries a particular weight in that context. Training requirements for infection prevention exist because the consequences of skipping them fall on people who cannot protect themselves. A resident who develops a catheter-associated urinary tract infection, or who contracts an illness that moves through a unit because a caregiver did not know the correct protocol for handling contaminated materials, does not always have the reserves to recover. The regulatory framework around infection control training was built on years of documented harm in facilities where those programs were weak or absent.
Whether the correction the facility reported on October 30 addressed the underlying conditions that produced 37 deficiencies, or whether it addressed the paperwork requirements of each individual citation, is a different question. Regulatory corrections are self-reported. Facilities declare a date by which they have fixed the problem. Inspectors may return to verify. The cycle is not always a straight line toward improvement.
What the September inspection left behind is a record. Thirty-seven deficiencies, including a failure to train staff on the very program designed to keep infections from reaching the people in their care. The residents at Rochester Residence and Care Center did not choose the conditions documented in that report. They were there, in rooms and common areas and dining halls, while the gaps the inspectors found were present around them.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Rochester Residence and Care Center from 2025-09-19 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: September 19, 2026 · Our methodology
ROCHESTER RESIDENCE AND CARE CENTER in ROCHESTER, PA was cited for violations during a health inspection on September 19, 2025.
Inspectors classified it as an isolated finding with no documented harm to residents, but with the potential for more than minimal harm.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.