Autumn Ridge Rehab: Pain Management Failures - IN

The admission came during a March 2026 inspection at Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre, where inspectors cited the facility for failing to properly manage a resident's pain. The resident, identified in inspection records only as Resident 22, had been complaining of mouth pain multiple times a day.

RN 3, as she was identified in the inspection report, told inspectors she should have assessed Resident 22 when the dental complaints first began. Her explanation for not doing so: the resident had previously been to the dentist and had already received her scheduled pain medications that morning. She did not explain why those two facts meant an assessment could wait.

The Director of Nursing was more direct. She told inspectors that RN 3 should have assessed Resident 22 when the mouth pain complaints started. Then she added something that cut against the staff's apparent reasoning. Resident 22 did have some attention-seeking behaviors, the DON acknowledged, but "pain isn't something you normally go to when attention seeking." Her instruction to staff: address the pain complaint first, because pain is subjective.

That instruction apparently had not been followed.

The inspection records trace a timeline that stretched across multiple days. On March 26, a behavior note logged at 6:23 a.m. recorded Resident 22 complaining of discomfort to her mouth, then shifting her complaint to her ear after staff gave her medication for the mouth pain. Staff administered Orajel, offered warm tea, and turned on a movie. The following morning, a progress note from 10:23 a.m. recorded that a nurse practitioner had seen Resident 22 for increased complaints of pain to her gums and written a new order for gabapentin, a prescription nerve pain medication, at 100 milligrams twice a day. Less than an hour and a half later, another note recorded that staff had followed up with Resident 22 about her "behavioral expression," noted the mouth pain had shifted to ear pain, found no signs of psychosocial distress, and planned to monitor her.

Two licensed practical nurses described to inspectors what they said they would do when a resident complained of mouth or jaw pain. LPN 4 said she would look right away to see if the resident could receive medication, and if not, would try repositioning or offer Orajel or hot tea. LPN 5 said she would assess any resident with that complaint, check for abnormalities, and notify the physician if needed. Both described the correct steps. Neither was asked to explain why those steps had not been taken for Resident 22 in the days before the nurse practitioner's visit.

The facility's pain management policy, dated January 2003, states that pain medications are to be prescribed and administered based on the intensity of pain as described by the resident, using a numerical or visual scale. The policy describes a facility committed to attaining or maintaining the highest practicable physical wellbeing. It does not account for what happens when a resident's repeated complaints are filtered through a staff assumption that she sometimes seeks attention.

Inspectors classified the violation as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm, and noted that few residents were affected.

Resident 22 complained of pain a couple of times a day, according to LPN 4. The gabapentin order came after the complaints had already escalated. Before that, her pain management had consisted largely of Orajel, warm tea, and a movie on the television.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre from 2026-03-31 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

• View all inspection reports for Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre
• Browse all IN nursing home inspections