Waters of Dunkirk: Abuse Report Delayed After Sex Assault - IN

The aide told the man to leave. He got angry, pulled up his pants, and walked out. Then she reported what she had seen to the charge nurse.

The charge nurse did not call the administrator. She did not call the state. She wrote a behavioral note.

That sequence of events, documented during a March 2026 complaint inspection at Waters of Dunkirk Skilled Nursing Facility, sits at the center of a federal deficiency citation against the Jay County nursing home. Inspectors found the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of abuse immediately to the administrator, which in turn caused a delay in notifying the Indiana State Department of Health within the required timeframe.

The woman, identified in inspection records as Resident B, had been diagnosed with unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit. A January 2026 assessment had rated her as having moderate cognitive impairment. The man, Resident C, carried diagnoses of unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance and delusional disorder. His January 2026 assessment rated him as having severe cognitive impairment.

Neither resident, by the facility's own clinical records, was assessed as capable of making fully informed decisions.

The medication aide, identified in the inspection report as QMA 7, described what she saw on the evening of March 22, 2026, between 7:00 and 8:00 p.m. Resident B's roommate was seated in her wheelchair in the hallway. QMA 7 saw half of Resident C's body inside Resident B's room as she passed. Resident B was in her recliner, leaning forward. Resident C was standing in front of her with his walker between them, his right knee propped on the walker seat, leaning toward her. QMA 7 told Resident C to leave. He got mad. He left.

She reported the observation to the charge nurse, identified as RN 16. They kept Resident C away from Resident B and other female residents for the rest of the shift.

RN 16 confirmed the account during an interview with inspectors on March 26. She said QMA 7 had told her what she witnessed. She acknowledged that when QMA 7 made the report, she did not tell anyone. "At the time," RN 16 told inspectors, "they had been told that it was okay for the residents to have a sexual relationship."

She made a behavioral note.

The administrator told inspectors on March 27 that she did not learn about the incident until the following morning, when RN 16 reported it to the Director of Nursing, who then brought it to the administrator. The administrator did not notify the state until that day, more than 24 hours after QMA 7 first walked past that room.

The facility's own written abuse prevention policy, handed to inspectors by the administrator on March 30, stated that anyone observing or suspecting resident abuse must immediately report it to the charge nurse, and that the charge nurse must immediately report it to the administrator. The policy further stated that when an alleged or suspected case of abuse is reported to the administrator, the administrator must notify the State Licensing and Certification Agency immediately.

RN 16 was the charge nurse. She received the report. She did not call the administrator.

The gap between what the policy required and what actually happened that night was not a matter of interpretation. QMA 7 did what she was supposed to do. She saw something, she stopped it, and she told the person above her. The chain broke at the next link.

The inspection records describe what followed the next day. A facility summary document dated March 23 at 2:56 p.m. noted that Resident B was being sent to the emergency room for a sexual assault evaluation. A second summary, dated eight minutes later, noted that staff had observed Resident C in a female resident's room receiving oral sex, that he had been agitated when asked to leave but did comply, and that fifteen-minute checks and one-on-one supervision had been initiated until Resident B could be sent for evaluation. The provider recommended Resident B be sent for psychiatric evaluation and treatment.

The March 23 documents were written the day after the incident. The supervision, the emergency room visit, the psychiatric referral — all of it came more than twelve hours after QMA 7 stood in that hallway and saw what she saw.

The deficiency was cited at a level of minimal harm or potential for actual harm, a designation that reflects the regulatory classification of the reporting failure rather than a finding about what the incident itself caused Resident B. The citation covers the delay in reporting, not a determination about the underlying sexual contact.

The facility's policy on sexual relationships between residents, referenced by RN 16 in her interview, does not appear further in the inspection record. What it said, when it was adopted, who communicated it to staff, and whether it was ever applied to residents assessed with moderate or severe cognitive impairment — none of that is addressed in the documents inspectors reviewed. RN 16 said staff had been told the relationship was permissible. The inspection record does not say who told them that, or when.

What the record does say is that Resident B, a woman with dementia and moderate cognitive impairment, was sent to an emergency room the afternoon of March 23 for a sexual assault evaluation. Her roommate had been sitting in the hallway in her wheelchair while it happened. A medication aide had seen it and reported it. A charge nurse had received that report and gone back to her shift.

The administrator was asked about the timeline. She confirmed it. RN 16 was asked about her decision. She explained it.

Nobody in the inspection record described what Resident B understood about what had happened to her, or what she was told before she was put in a vehicle and taken to the emergency room the next afternoon.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Waters of Dunkirk Skilled Nursing Facility, The from 2026-03-30 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

• View all inspection reports for Waters of Dunkirk Skilled Nursing Facility, The
• Browse all IN nursing home inspections