Skip to main content
Advertisement

Valley Healthcare Center: Marijuana, Missing Care Plans - CA

Healthcare Facility:

The Director of Nursing at Valley Healthcare Center told federal inspectors in January that Resident 64 had been found with marijuana and had told staff he was driving his car. She expressed concern for his safety when driving because of his substance use and the unresolved surgical wound.

Valley Healthcare Center facility inspection

But no care plan existed to address the resident's illegal drug use or his driving.

Advertisement

"The facility don't know how to keep Resident 64 safe when driving his car," the Director of Nursing told inspectors on January 20. She acknowledged that a care plan should have been developed to ensure his safety when using mind-altering substances and driving.

The facility's own policy, dated November 1, 2017, requires comprehensive person-centered care plans for each resident based on their individual needs. The plans must include measurable objectives and timetables to meet medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs.

The Director of Nursing admitted the policy wasn't followed.

Valley Healthcare Center's care planning failures extended beyond the marijuana case. Inspectors found two other residents whose safety risks went unaddressed by formal care plans.

Resident 9 left the facility with his ex-wife on May 6, 2025, and didn't return until May 9 — a three-day absence that staff apparently didn't know about in advance. When inspectors asked for evidence of a care plan addressing the resident's pattern of leaving without informing staff, the Social Services Director couldn't provide one.

"There was no care plan written for non-compliance," the Social Services Director told inspectors on January 29.

The third case involved Resident 56, who had been prescribed Cresemba, a medication used to treat serious fungal infections. The resident started taking 186 milligrams twice daily on January 23, according to physician orders.

When inspectors asked the Infection Prevention Nurse for evidence of a care plan addressing the antifungal medication, she couldn't provide one either.

Federal regulations require nursing homes to develop individualized care plans that address each resident's specific needs and circumstances. The plans serve as roadmaps for staff to provide appropriate care and maintain resident safety.

At Valley Healthcare Center, that system broke down repeatedly. Three residents with distinct safety concerns — one using illegal drugs while driving, another leaving the facility without notice, and a third taking potent antifungal medication — all lacked the basic care planning required by federal law.

The facility's care planning policy specifically states its purpose: "To ensure that a comprehensive person-centered Care Plan is developed for each resident based on their individual assessed needs." It also requires plans to address any services that might be needed, including situations where residents exercise their right to refuse treatment.

The marijuana case presented particularly complex safety issues. Resident 64's combination of substance use, driving, and an unhealed foot wound created multiple risk factors that should have triggered immediate care planning. The Director of Nursing's admission that staff didn't know how to keep him safe while driving highlighted the facility's lack of preparation for such scenarios.

Resident 9's three-day disappearance raised different concerns about monitoring and communication. The fact that he left with his ex-wife suggests some level of planning, but the absence of any care plan to address his tendency to leave without informing staff left the facility unprepared to ensure his safety or track his whereabouts.

The antifungal medication case involved medical complexity that also warranted specialized attention. Cresemba treats serious fungal infections and can have significant side effects and drug interactions. Without a care plan addressing the medication's use, staff lacked guidance on monitoring requirements and potential complications.

Federal inspectors classified the violations as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm to a few residents. The inspection occurred following a complaint, suggesting someone had raised concerns about the facility's care planning practices.

The deficiencies violated federal tag F656, which governs comprehensive care planning requirements. This regulation mandates that nursing homes develop detailed, individualized plans that address each resident's full range of needs and circumstances.

Valley Healthcare Center's failures left three residents without the systematic attention their situations required, creating gaps in safety oversight that federal regulators deemed unacceptable for a facility entrusted with vulnerable residents' care.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Valley Healthcare Center from 2026-01-29 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 21, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER in BAKERSFIELD, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on January 29, 2026.

She expressed concern for his safety when driving because of his substance use and the unresolved surgical wound.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER?
She expressed concern for his safety when driving because of his substance use and the unresolved surgical wound.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in BAKERSFIELD, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 555229.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.