Skip to main content
Advertisement
Complaint Investigation

Valley Healthcare Center

Inspection Date: January 29, 2026
Total Violations 3
Facility ID 555229
Location BAKERSFIELD, CA
Advertisement

Inspection Findings

F-Tag F0656

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Harm Level: Potential for More Than Minimal Harm

F 0656 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few

During an interview on 1/20/26 at 3:30 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated Resident 64 had said he was driving his car. DON stated Resident 64 had been found to have marijuana on his bedside table. DON stated there was a concern for Resident 64's safety when he would go out and drive his car because of his substance use and unresolved surgical wound on his right foot.

During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/20/26 at 3:45 p.m. with DON, Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 1/20/26, was reviewed. There was no care plan developed to address Resident 64's use of illegal substance and driving his car. DON stated the facility don't know how to keep Resident 64 safe when driving his car. DON stated there should have been a care plan developed for Resident 64 to ensure his safety when using a mind altering substance and when driving his car.

During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/26/26 at 11 a.m. with DON, the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Planning, dated 11/1/17, was reviewed. The P&P indicated, Purpose To ensure that a comprehensive person-centered Care Plan is developed for each resident based on their individual assessed needs. The Care Plan will include measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. DON stated P&P was not followed.

  1. 2. During a review of Resident 9's Medical Record (MR), [undated], the MR indicated Resident 9 went out
  2. with ex-wife on 5/6/25 and returned on 5/9/25.

    During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/29/26 at 3:10 p.m. with SSD, Resident 9's Care Plan, was reviewed. SSD was unable to provide evidence a care plan was developed and implemented for Resident 9's leaving facility without informing the staff. SSD stated there was no care plan written for non-compliance.

  3. 3. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/29/26 at 2:30 p.m. with Infection Prevention Nurse
  4. (IP), Resident 56's Care Plan, was reviewed. IP was unable to provide evidence a care plan was developed and implemented for Resident 56's medication Cresemba (medication for fungal infection).

    During a review of Resident 56's Physician Orders (PO), dated 1/23/26, the PO indicated, Cresemba 186 milligram was started on 1/23/26 two capsules once time a day.

    During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Planning, dated 11/1/2017, the P&P indicated, To ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan is developed for each resident based

    on their individual assessed needs. Procedure. II. B. Any services that would be required, but are not provided due to the resident's exercise of rights, which includes the right to refuse treatment.

    FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete

    Event ID:

    Facility ID:

    If continuation sheet

    Printed: 04/13/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391

    Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION

    (X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:

    (X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION

    B. Wing

    A. Building

    (X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED

    01/29/2026

    NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER

    STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE

    Valley Healthcare Center

    1205 8th Street Bakersfield, CA 93304

    For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG

    SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)

Advertisement

F-Tag F0658

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Harm Level: Potential for More Than Minimal Harm

F 0658 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few

FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete

into the stomach) leaking from the GT insertion site. TN stated the moisture around the GT site was causing irritation and redness on Resident 35's skin. TN stated Resident 35's GT site should have been monitored as needed to keep the GT site clean and dry. During an interview on 1/28/26 at 11:50 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4, CNA 4 stated she saw Resident 35 on 1/28/26 around 10:30 a.m. and

the dressing on Resident 35's GT site was black and did not cover the GT site. CNA 4 stated she did not notify TN or any licensed nurse about Resident 35's GT site. CNA 4 stated she should have notified the TN or any licensed nurse to change the dressing on Resident 35's GT site.During a concurrent interview and

record review on 1/28/26 at 12:44 p.m. with DON, Resident 35's Care Plans (CP), dated 1/28/26, was reviewed. The CP indicated there was no care plan developed to address Resident 35's skin irritation on her GT site. DON stated Resident 35's skin irritation on her GT site was caused by the GT formula leaking from the GT insertion site. DON stated there should have been a care plan to monitor if the dressing on Resident 35's GT site needs to be changed to prevent further skin breakdown. DON stated CNA 1 should have notified a licensed nurse when the dressing on Resident 35's GT site needed to be changed.During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/28/26 at 12:44 p.m. with DON, the facility's P&P titled, Wound Management, dated 11/1/17, was reviewed. The P&P indicated, Purpose To provide a system for the treatment and management of residents with wounds including pressure and non-pressure ulcers. A Licensed Nurse will perform a skin assessment upon admission, readmission, weekly, and as needed for each resident. A Licensed Nurse will develop a Care Plan for the resident based on recommendations from Dietary, Rehabilitation and the Attending Physician. Per Attending Physician order, the Nursing Staff will initiate treatment and utilize interventions for pressure redistribution and wound management. DON stated

the P&P was not followed.

Event ID:

Facility ID:

If continuation sheet

Printed: 04/13/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391

Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION

(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:

(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION

B. Wing

A. Building

(X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED

01/29/2026

NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER

STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE

Valley Healthcare Center

1205 8th Street Bakersfield, CA 93304

For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG

SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)

Advertisement

F-Tag F0919

Environmental Deficiencies
Harm Level: Potential for More Than Minimal Harm

F 0919

Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.

Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call system was available and functional for the residents in two of two sampled shower rooms. This failure had the potential to put the residents at risk for falls. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/27/26 at 2:08 p.m. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) in the shower room in station 3, the shower room did not have a call system present. MS stated there was no call system available for residents using the toilet and the shower

in the shower room in station 3. MS stated there should have been an alternative call system provided for

the residents using the toilet and the shower in the shower rooms.During a concurrent observation and

interview on 1/27/26 at 2:15 p.m. with MS in the shower room in station 2, there was a black wireless call button with a bell logo hanging on the hand rail next to the toilet. MS pressed the black wireless call button.

MS went to the nurses station 1 but there was no alarm heard from the shower room in station 2. MS stated there should have been an alarm heard at the nurses station 1 alerting the staff somebody needed assistance in the shower room in station 2. MS stated he would replace the black wireless call button in the shower rooms, but the black wireless call buttons would go missing. MS stated there should have been a functional call system available for the residents using the toilet and the shower in the shower rooms.During

an interview on 1/28/26 at 12:44 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated the facility had two shower rooms (station 2 and station 3). DON stated the call system had not been working in the shower rooms and it had been an ongoing issue in the facility. DON stated there should have been an alternative call system available for the residents. DON stated Resident 85 and Resident 14 were using the toilet in the shower room in station 3. DON stated Resident 85 and Resident 14 were at risk for falls. DON stated if there was no call system in the shower rooms, it would put the residents at risk for accidents and falls.During a review of Resident 85's Morse Fall Scale (MFS), dated 12/9/25, the MFS indicated, Resident 85 had a score of 55 (score of 45 and higher means high risk for falls).During a review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 12/31/25, the MDS indicated, Resident 14 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 6 (score of 0-7 means severe cognitive impairment).During a review of Resident 14's MFS, dated 12/31/25, the MFS indicated, Resident 14 had a score of 60.During an interview on 1/28/26 at 1:26 p.m. with Resident 14, Resident 14 stated he was able to control his bladder and would independently use the toilet in the shower room in station 3. Resident 14 stated there was no call system in the shower room.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Communication - Call System, dated 11/1/17, the P&P indicated, Purpose To provide a mechanism for residents to promptly communicate with nursing staff. The Facility will provide a call system to enable residents to alert the nursing staff from their rooms and toileting/bathing facilities. Should the primary call system become inoperable for any reason, the Facility shall provide a bell for each resident room. Call bells located within resident bathrooms are considered emergency calls due to the potential for falls and injury and must be answered promptly.

Residents Affected - Many

FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete

Event ID:

Facility ID:

If continuation sheet

📋 Inspection Summary

VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER in BAKERSFIELD, CA inspection on recent inspection.

Found 0 violation(s). Severity: Standard violations. Status: 0 corrected, 0 pending.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. All deficiencies must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an F-tag violation?
F-tags are federal deficiency codes used by CMS to categorize nursing home violations. Each F-tag corresponds to a specific federal regulation (42 CFR Part 483). For example, F607 relates to abuse prevention policies, F880 relates to infection control.
Were these violations corrected?
Facilities must submit plans of correction and implement changes within required timeframes. CMS conducts follow-up inspections to verify corrections. Check the inspection report for specific correction dates and follow-up verification status.
How often do nursing home inspections happen?
CMS conducts unannounced inspections of all Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes at least once per year. Additional inspections may occur based on complaints, facility-reported incidents, or follow-up to verify previous violations were corrected.
What should families do about these violations?
Families should: (1) Review the full inspection report for details, (2) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspections, (4) Compare with other facilities in BAKERSFIELD, CA, (5) Report new concerns to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
Complete inspection reports are available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request copies directly from VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. Reports include deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines.
« Back to Facility Page
Advertisement
Advertisement