Federal inspectors found that nursing staff ignored written protocols for administering Midodrine to Resident #5, who suffered from end-stage renal disease and hypotension. The medication treats orthostatic hypotension, a sudden fall in blood pressure that occurs when a person stands up.

The resident's care plan, dated November 3, 2025, specifically documented the medical focus: "I have hypotension related to ESRD." The interventions were clear: "Give medications as ordered. Monitor vital signs as ordered and as clinically indicated."
But staff didn't follow through.
Licensed Practical Nurse #4 told inspectors during a January 29 interview that "the care plan is a guide for the staff on how to care for the residents and their individual needs." The nurse spoke at 7:45 that morning, apparently unaware that her own facility had been failing to implement that guidance.
Canterbury's written policy requires a comprehensive, person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and timetables for each resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs. The policy exists on paper. The implementation did not.
For residents with end-stage renal disease, blood pressure management becomes critical. Orthostatic hypotension can cause dizziness, fainting, and falls when patients attempt to stand or change positions. Midodrine helps prevent these dangerous drops by tightening blood vessels.
The inspection was conducted as a complaint investigation, suggesting someone reported concerns about care quality at the facility. Inspectors reviewed clinical records, facility documents, and interviewed staff to verify the allegations.
Canterbury's administrator, director of nursing, and regional director of operations learned about the findings on January 29 at approximately 4:45 p.m. All three administrative staff members received the information during the inspector's exit conference.
None provided additional information to address the violation.
The care plan failure affected one of six residents examined in the survey sample, but inspectors classified the violation as having potential for actual harm. Federal regulators determine harm levels based on the severity of the deficiency and its impact on resident safety and well-being.
Canterbury operates at 1776 Cambridge Drive in Richmond. The facility must submit a plan of correction to continue participating in Medicare and Medicaid programs. Under federal rules, nursing homes have 14 days after receiving deficiency reports to make their correction plans public.
The violation represents a breakdown in the most basic nursing home function: following individualized care plans that address residents' specific medical needs. Care plans serve as roadmaps for daily care, translating physician orders and medical assessments into actionable steps for nursing staff.
When those plans exist but aren't implemented, residents face unnecessary health risks. For Resident #5, the failure meant potentially dangerous blood pressure fluctuations went unmanaged despite clear medical protocols.
The inspection narrative doesn't indicate how long the care plan violations continued or whether the resident experienced adverse effects from the missed medication administration. It also doesn't specify whether other residents received similar substandard care.
Federal inspectors found the deficiency during a targeted complaint investigation rather than a routine annual survey, suggesting specific concerns prompted the review. Complaint surveys typically focus on particular allegations rather than comprehensive facility assessments.
Canterbury must now demonstrate to state and federal regulators that it has systems in place to ensure care plan implementation. The facility faces potential enforcement actions if it fails to correct the deficiency or if inspectors find similar violations during follow-up visits.
The case highlights ongoing challenges in nursing home care coordination, where written plans often fail to translate into consistent daily practice. Licensed practical nurses like the one interviewed carry significant responsibility for medication administration and care plan implementation, but systemic failures can undermine individual efforts.
For Resident #5, the comprehensive care plan existed as a document. As effective medical care, it did not.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Canterbury Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center from 2026-01-29 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Canterbury Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
- Browse all VA nursing home inspections