Skip to main content
Advertisement

Ridgeview Skilled Nursing: Catheter Care Failures - CA

The resident, admitted with a broken tailbone and neurogenic bladder, required careful monitoring of fluid intake and output every shift according to physician orders dated September 15. But when federal inspectors reviewed the records in November, they found gaps in documentation and a facility that couldn't produce basic intake records.

Ridgeview Skilled Nursing Facility facility inspection

Family Member 1 told inspectors she visited on September 15 and found her relative without the catheter despite a history of bladder problems. "Resident 1 did not have a foley catheter," she said. She had to request that licensed nurses insert one.

Advertisement

The facility hadn't been performing bladder scans or documenting when the resident urinated, according to the family member. Only after she intervened and the medical doctor was notified did staff insert the catheter.

Licensed Nurse 1 confirmed to inspectors that the resident needed the flexible tube "for Neurogenic Bladder" and that "intake and output should be recorded every shift to ensure bladder function."

Yet the medication records from September tell a different story.

On September 15, the day physician orders required monitoring to begin, no urine output was recorded for any of the three shifts. September 23 was marked "NA." September 24 had only an "x" for the morning shift.

The documented output swung wildly from day to day. September 16 showed 60 milliliters in the morning, then 350 in the evening, then 400 overnight. September 21 recorded 550 milliliters in the morning and 750 in the evening, but only 40 milliliters during the night shift.

Certified Nursing Assistant 1 described the process to inspectors: "We emptied Resident 1's urinary bag, record urine output, and inform the charge nurse of the total urine output at the end of the shift."

But the erratic documentation suggested that process wasn't happening consistently.

When inspectors asked Director of Nursing for intake records on November 25, she said the facility couldn't provide them. The records had "passed the 30-day period since Resident 1 was admitted and discharged" and she "could not access the record."

A week later, on December 1, inspectors interviewed the Director of Nursing again. She acknowledged "it was important to document an accurate intake and output to monitor Resident 1's overall health condition."

She still couldn't provide the intake records.

The resident's mental status assessment from September 19 showed intact cognition with a score of 15, meaning they would have been aware of their care and any problems with their catheter management.

The facility's policy on "Bowel and Bladder Management Process," dated April 9, offered no clear guidance for situations like this, according to inspectors.

For residents with neurogenic bladder, consistent monitoring becomes critical. The condition, caused by nerve damage, prevents normal bladder control and can lead to complications including infections, kidney damage, and autonomic dysreflexia if not properly managed.

The inspection was triggered by a complaint, though the report doesn't specify who filed it or what specific concerns prompted the federal review.

The violation was classified as causing minimal harm with potential for actual harm, affecting few residents. But for the family member who had to advocate for basic catheter care, the failure represented a breakdown in fundamental nursing responsibilities.

Federal inspectors noted that proper catheter care requires not just insertion and maintenance, but systematic tracking of how well the device functions. Without accurate intake and output records, medical staff cannot identify developing problems or adjust treatment.

The resident was discharged before inspectors arrived in late November, leaving behind incomplete records and unanswered questions about whether their bladder condition received appropriate monitoring during their stay.

The facility's inability to produce basic intake documentation more than a month after the resident's departure raised additional concerns about record-keeping practices that extend beyond this single case.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Ridgeview Skilled Nursing Facility from 2025-11-24 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 23, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

RIDGEVIEW SKILLED NURSING FACILITY in SAN DIEGO, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on November 24, 2025.

But when federal inspectors reviewed the records in November, they found gaps in documentation and a facility that couldn't produce basic intake records.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at RIDGEVIEW SKILLED NURSING FACILITY?
But when federal inspectors reviewed the records in November, they found gaps in documentation and a facility that couldn't produce basic intake records.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in SAN DIEGO, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from RIDGEVIEW SKILLED NURSING FACILITY or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 555928.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check RIDGEVIEW SKILLED NURSING FACILITY's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.