Skip to main content
Advertisement

Willow Tree Healthcare: Blood Sugar Crisis Cover-Up - WV

Healthcare Facility:

Medical records told a different story.

Willow Tree Healthcare Center facility inspection

The same day the resident's blood glucose crashed, doctors at Willow Tree Healthcare Center discontinued his previous insulin order and wrote a new one reducing his dose from 38 units to 30 units. They also ordered staff to give him "a small snack of crackers and cheese before bedtime to prevent hypoglycemia."

Advertisement

The Assistant Director of Nursing told state investigators on October 28 that facility staff "had been unaware of the incident" until the resident filed his complaint on October 20. But the medical orders dated October 17 proved the facility knew immediately what had happened and why.

The resident had asked for food around 1 or 2 a.m. on October 16, hours before his blood sugar would crash. A nursing assistant told him there were no sandwiches available, but the resident later complained that the aide had told him to "shut up and go to bed."

Licensed Practical Nurse #11 backed up the nursing assistant's version of events in a written statement dated October 21. "I never heard [the nursing assistant] tell resident to shut up," she wrote. "Resident had asked for a sandwich, [the nursing assistant] asked me if we had any. I stated that we don't have any sandwiches."

The nursing assistant, who had worked as an aide for 32 years, denied telling the resident to shut up. "I may have told him to try to get some sleep which I tell a lot of residents to try to get some sleep," she wrote in her October 20 statement. "I've been a NA for 32 years and have never told a resident to shut up."

But someone had told the resident's roommate about the incident. When investigators interviewed Resident #30 on October 28, he said he had been out of the facility on October 16 but "heard about it when I got back."

The facility suspended the nursing assistant pending investigation and reported the incident to the sheriff's office. Their five-day follow-up report to state authorities, submitted October 22, concluded there was "insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation of verbal mistreatment."

The investigation summary stated that "no witnesses or corroborating evidence were found to support the allegation" and that "no physical or emotional harm identified in the resident."

Federal investigators found that conclusion problematic. The resident had presented with a blood glucose level of 40 — a reading that can cause confusion, seizures, or even coma — on the morning after the incident. Normal blood glucose levels typically range from 80 to 130.

Despite this dangerous medical event and the resident's expressed frustration about his treatment, facility administrators maintained in their report that no harm had occurred.

The contradiction between the facility's public stance and their private actions was stark. While telling state investigators they knew nothing about any incident until October 20, medical staff had immediately adjusted the resident's insulin regimen on October 17 and added preventive measures specifically designed to avoid future episodes of dangerously low blood sugar.

The timing suggests facility staff understood the connection between the resident's request for food in the early morning hours and his subsequent hypoglycemic episode. Diabetic patients often experience nighttime drops in blood glucose, and a bedtime snack is a standard intervention to prevent such episodes.

The facility's investigation focused entirely on whether the nursing assistant had used inappropriate language, while overlooking the medical crisis that had prompted the resident's complaint in the first place. The resident's blood sugar reading of 40 represented a potentially life-threatening emergency, yet administrators described the incident as causing no physical harm.

Federal investigators cited the facility for failing to ensure residents were free from verbal mistreatment and for inadequate investigation of the incident. The violation carried a determination of "minimal harm or potential for actual harm" affecting "few" residents.

The case highlights how nursing home investigations can miss the broader context of resident complaints. A diabetic resident asking for food at 1 a.m. and then experiencing severe hypoglycemia hours later represents a medical emergency requiring immediate attention and thorough investigation.

Instead, the facility treated it as a he-said-she-said dispute about whether staff had been rude, while simultaneously taking medical actions that proved they understood the seriousness of what had occurred.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Willow Tree Healthcare Center from 2025-10-30 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 28, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

WILLOW TREE HEALTHCARE CENTER in CHARLES TOWN, WV was cited for violations during a health inspection on October 30, 2025.

Medical records told a different story.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at WILLOW TREE HEALTHCARE CENTER?
Medical records told a different story.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in CHARLES TOWN, WV, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from WILLOW TREE HEALTHCARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 515156.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check WILLOW TREE HEALTHCARE CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.