The falsified records at Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare - Terrace at St Francis came to light during a complaint investigation that wrapped up October 29. Staff had been required since September 15 to keep the resident's heels elevated or protected with special boots whenever the person was in bed.
Instead, inspectors found the boots sitting on the floor next to the bed.
On October 27 at 3:59 PM, an inspector observed the resident in bed with boots on the floor and heels resting directly on the mattress. The next morning at 8:00 AM, the boots remained in the same spot on the floor. By October 29 at 7:25 AM, nothing had changed.
Two certified nursing assistants confirmed the resident's heels were not protected when asked directly by the inspector on October 28.
Yet nursing staff documented on the resident's Treatment Administration Record that heel boots had been applied during all three shifts on October 27, 28, and 29. The documentation claimed compliance with the September 15 order to "offload both heels while resident is in bed, every shift."
Licensed Practical Nurse E told the inspector on October 28 that the resident should indeed be wearing heel boots while in bed. The nurse said that if the resident refused to wear the boots, nursing assistants were supposed to inform the nurse so the refusal could be documented.
No such refusal was documented. No explanation was offered for why the boots remained on the floor.
The resident's worksheet specifically instructed nursing assistants to place the boots when the person was in bed. The September 15 treatment order made the requirement clear to all staff.
When the inspector raised concerns with Nursing Home Administrator A and Director of Nursing B on October 28, they acknowledged the resident was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and other skin conditions without proper heel protection.
They provided no explanation for why the resident had been observed without the required boots throughout the inspection.
Pressure ulcers develop when sustained pressure reduces blood flow to skin and underlying tissue. Heels are particularly vulnerable because they bear significant pressure when a person lies in bed. The boots work by elevating the heels slightly off the mattress surface, eliminating direct pressure contact.
The facility's own treatment plan recognized this risk by ordering heel protection every shift. The nursing assistants' worksheet reinforced the requirement. The licensed practical nurse understood the protocol.
But for at least three days running, the protection wasn't provided while staff documented that it was.
The discrepancy between documentation and reality emerged only because a state inspector happened to be conducting a complaint investigation. The inspector made multiple observations across different shifts, creating a clear pattern of non-compliance.
Had the inspection not occurred, the false documentation would have continued unchallenged. The resident would have remained at risk for pressure sores while official records suggested proper care was being provided.
The violation falls under federal regulations requiring nursing homes to provide necessary care and services to maintain each resident's highest possible level of well-being. It also involves accurate documentation of care provided.
State inspectors classified the violation as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm. The finding affected few residents, suggesting the problem was specific to this individual case rather than a facility-wide documentation issue.
The inspection report provides no details about the resident's condition, age, or mobility level. It doesn't indicate whether pressure sores actually developed during the period of non-compliance.
What it does show is a clear breakdown in basic care protocols. A simple intervention - placing protective boots on a resident's feet - was ordered, understood by staff, and documented as completed while actually being ignored.
The resident lay in bed for three days with heels pressed against the mattress, at risk for skin breakdown that could lead to painful, slow-healing wounds. Meanwhile, official records suggested everything was fine.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Wheaton Franciscan Hc - Terrace At St Francis from 2025-10-29 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Wheaton Franciscan Hc - Terrace At St Francis
- Browse all WI nursing home inspections