Nursing Home Administrator NHA-A at Wisconsin Rapids Health Services told federal inspectors on October 6 that she did not complete a proper investigation after a resident's spouse reported that Certified Nursing Assistant CNA-E yelled at a stroke patient on September 2.
The administrator said she "knew R7, R8, and CNA-E and thought CNA-E's tone was taken wrong."
R8 filed a formal grievance on September 3, reporting that CNA-E had yelled at R7 — R8's spouse — for getting out of bed the previous day. According to the grievance, an alarm sounded when R7 was watching television in a wheelchair and attempted to reach the remote control. CNA-E entered the room and yelled at the resident.
R7 had been admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke affecting the right dominant side, as well as difficulty swallowing. A mental status assessment completed September 10 showed R7 had moderate cognitive impairment, scoring 12 out of 15 points.
R8, who was not cognitively impaired according to facility assessments, witnessed the incident involving their spouse.
The facility's own abuse policy, revised July 15, 2022, explicitly states that verbal abuse includes "inappropriate verbal conduct overheard" and requires "an immediate investigation" when allegations of abuse occur. The policy also mandates that the facility "make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm during and after the investigation."
None of this happened.
Instead, the administrator's investigation consisted of informal conversations. The grievance form noted that "staff had no follow-up or further information and did not confirm or deny the incident." When the administrator discussed the matter with CNA-E, the aide offered no comment about "being firm with a resident who puts themself at risk and the perception of coming across as yelling."
The grievance was marked "resolved" on September 20, nearly three weeks after the initial report.
During her interview with federal inspectors, NHA-A acknowledged that CNA-E "is not a soft person" and admitted it "sounded like CNA-E entered the room with intensity which was perceived as yelling." She told inspectors she frequently talks with staff about "checking themselves at the door prior to entering a resident's room."
Yet despite these admissions, she had not treated the September incident as requiring formal investigation.
The administrator ultimately agreed with inspectors that "the allegation of abuse should have been thoroughly investigated, including resident and staff interviews and staff education."
Federal regulations require nursing homes to protect residents from all forms of abuse, including verbal mistreatment. Facilities must investigate allegations immediately and take steps to prevent future incidents. The Wisconsin Rapids facility's failure to follow its own written policies left a vulnerable stroke patient without the protections federal law requires.
R7's medical condition made them particularly vulnerable to the psychological harm that verbal abuse can cause. Stroke patients with moderate cognitive impairment and physical limitations often struggle to advocate for themselves or escape distressing situations.
The facility's approach to the grievance — essentially dismissing it based on the administrator's personal assessment of the staff member's character — violated both federal requirements and the facility's own policies.
The September 2 incident occurred when R7 was simply trying to watch television and reach for a remote control. The resident's attempt to access entertainment triggered a bed alarm, a safety measure designed to alert staff when patients with fall risks move independently.
CNA-E's response to this routine situation — entering the room with what the administrator described as "intensity" that was "perceived as yelling" — represented exactly the kind of inappropriate verbal conduct the facility's own policy identifies as potential abuse.
The administrator's decision to rely on her personal knowledge of CNA-E rather than conducting the required investigation meant that no one interviewed R7 about the experience. No one documented exactly what words were used or how the interaction affected the cognitively impaired stroke patient.
No staff education occurred to prevent similar incidents. No protective measures were implemented.
The grievance process, which should have triggered immediate investigation and protection for R7, instead became a three-week exercise in administrative inaction. The September 20 "resolution" resolved nothing — it simply closed a file without addressing whether verbal abuse had occurred or ensuring it would not happen again.
Federal inspectors found that Wisconsin Rapids Health Services failed to respond appropriately to the allegation of verbal abuse, violating requirements designed to protect nursing home residents from mistreatment.
The facility's own policy acknowledged that residents can be harmed by "inappropriate verbal conduct" and required immediate investigation of such allegations. The administrator's failure to follow these procedures left R7 without the protections both federal law and facility policy promised.
R8 continues to live at the facility, having witnessed their cognitively impaired spouse subjected to what they perceived as verbal abuse, with no meaningful investigation or resolution of their concerns.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Wisconsin Rapids Health Services from 2025-10-06 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Wisconsin Rapids Health Services
- Browse all WI nursing home inspections