Aperion Care Marion: Staff Threatened Resident - Marion, IN
The aide later told facility management he probably did say it.
The resident, identified in inspection records only as Resident C, described what happened in an interview with inspectors that morning. The dietary aide, identified as DA 3, started running his mouth, Resident C said. Told him if he did not quit talking, he was going to knock him out. Other residents were in the room. Other dietary staff were in the room. Resident C walked away. DA 3 followed him and continued.
That was not the first time, Resident C told inspectors, that DA 3 had been disrespectful to him.
The facility's administrator gave inspectors the full version of what DA 3 said he said. Not just that he would knock Resident C out. That he would knock his f*ing a out. When the administrator and the dietary manager confronted DA 3 about it separately, his response, according to the administrator, was: "Yeah, I probably did say that."
DA 3 had a different frame for what happened. In his own interview with inspectors, conducted the same morning at 11:36 a.m., he described Resident C as having become unruly during breakfast. Resident C had cut into the service line and gotten his own drink. DA 3 said he had told Resident C on previous occasions that he was not allowed behind the service line. He felt Resident C was being disrespectful to the dietary staff. He acknowledged he might have been a little loud when addressing Resident C, and said he had reported the incident to the dietary manager himself. By the time inspectors arrived, DA 3 had already been suspended pending an investigation. He was later terminated.
He told inspectors he felt Resident C's account had been credited over his own.
What the dietary manager told inspectors added a detail that made the full picture harder to dismiss. DA 3 had not simply shown up for his shift that morning. He had been waiting in the back parking lot before the incident. The dietary manager said none of the dietary staff present during breakfast had seen or heard the threatening exchange, which left the accounts of DA 3 and Resident C as the primary versions of events.
The administrator, in her interview at 11:55 a.m., addressed that directly. Resident C, she said, did not have a history of being dishonest.
There was also context that went beyond the facility walls. The administrator told inspectors that DA 3 and Resident C had a history with each other that predated either of them being at Aperion Care Marion. DA 3 had also told management that he had yelled at Resident C the day before the breakfast incident, not inside the building but outside, in front of the facility, when passing him. That prior confrontation had not been the one that triggered the complaint.
The inspection was a complaint investigation, meaning someone had reported the incident to state regulators before inspectors arrived. The report does not identify who filed the complaint.
Inspectors cited the facility under F0600, the federal tag covering abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents. The level of harm was classified as minimal harm or potential for actual harm. The number of residents affected was listed as few.
Those classifications sit at the lower end of the federal deficiency scale. They do not capture what Resident C described: a man employed by his nursing home, someone he encountered daily in the dining room, following him across a room and telling him he was going to knock him out, in front of other people, after a history of disrespect that Resident C said had been building. The threat did not leave a bruise. It did not require hospitalization. Under federal inspection categories, it registers as minimal.
Resident C walked away from DA 3 that morning. DA 3 followed him.
The facility's own abuse prevention policy, provided to inspectors by the administrator the day before the inspection concluded, defined verbal abuse to include threats of harm and saying things to frighten a resident, regardless of the resident's age, ability to comprehend, or disability. It required any employee who became aware of abuse or mistreatment to report immediately to the administrator or a department head. DA 3 had reported the incident to the dietary manager himself, framing it as a problem with a difficult resident rather than as an abuse report.
The dietary manager confirmed to inspectors that DA 3 had come to him after the incident and told him about Resident C getting his own drinks and passing coffee to other residents. That was the version of events DA 3 brought to management on his own. DA 3, according to the dietary manager, just wanted to do his job.
The administrator's account and DA 3's own admission to her and the dietary manager that he probably did say it closed the factual gap that might otherwise have existed between the two men's versions of the morning. He did not deny it when it mattered. He was suspended. He was terminated. The facility's internal process, by the time inspectors arrived, had already reached a conclusion.
What the inspection report does not say is whether anyone spoke with Resident C between the incident and the arrival of inspectors. It does not say whether he was offered any support, or whether the prior incidents he described, the earlier disrespect from DA 3 that he said was not new, were ever documented or addressed before the morning of the threat.
It does not say what it was like to live at Aperion Care Marion and eat breakfast in a room where the man serving your food had a history with you from before either of you arrived, and had already yelled at you outside the building the day before, and followed you across the dining room telling you what he was going to do to you, while the other staff present heard nothing.
Resident C told inspectors what happened. The administrator confirmed it. DA 3 confirmed it himself.
He was gone. Resident C was still there.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Aperion Care Marion LLC from 2025-09-30 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: Official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
Editorial process: AI-synthesized regulatory data, reviewed for accuracy by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: August 4, 2026 · Our methodology
APERION CARE MARION LLC in MARION, IN was cited for violations during a health inspection on September 30, 2025.
The aide later told facility management he probably did say it.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.