Resident #1 stayed at the facility for 25 days in early 2025, admitted with type 2 diabetes, bipolar disorder, anxiety and depression. Her cognitive assessment scored 15 out of 15, indicating she was mentally intact and capable of making decisions about her care.
During that stay, she should have received 12 opportunities for showers or bed baths. The facility documented only six.
Family Member Y raised concerns during a meeting with management about whether Resident #1 was receiving adequate bathing to monitor her skin for yeast and rashes — a critical concern for diabetic patients prone to skin complications.
The facility's shower sheets showed Resident #1 received four showers or bed baths and refused two others. That left six occasions with no documentation at all.
When pressed about the missing records, Nursing Home Administrator A produced a late entry progress note written by a nurse on March 3, 2025, the day after the family meeting. The note claimed Resident #1 had received a bed bath on February 26 with no skin issues reported, and that she had declined both a bed bath and shower on February 28 when approached three times.
But when the administrator was asked where the nurse got that information, since no shower sheets or other documentation supported those claims, he said he didn't know.
The facility's own documentation policy, implemented in March 2024, requires that each resident's medical record contain "an accurate representation of the actual experiences of the resident" with "complete, accurate, and timely documentation." The policy specifically states that documentation must be completed at the time of service, but no later than the shift when the care occurred.
The late entry progress note violated that standard, appearing only after family complaints rather than when the alleged care happened.
For diabetic residents like Resident #1, regular bathing serves a medical purpose beyond basic hygiene. Diabetes can cause poor circulation and reduced sensation, making patients vulnerable to skin infections, yeast overgrowth, and slow-healing wounds that can become serious complications if not detected early.
The documentation gaps meant the facility couldn't prove whether Resident #1 received the skin monitoring she needed during her stay. Six undocumented opportunities for bathing represented nearly three weeks of potential missed assessments for a patient whose medical conditions made skin surveillance essential.
Federal inspectors found the facility's record-keeping failures put residents at risk by making it impossible to track whether basic care was provided or refused. Without accurate documentation, staff on subsequent shifts couldn't know whether a resident had been bathed, creating the potential for missed care or unnecessary repeated attempts.
The administrator's inability to explain where the nurse obtained information for the late entry note highlighted deeper problems with the facility's documentation practices. If nurses were recording care based on undocumented sources or assumptions rather than actual observation, the medical record's reliability was compromised.
Resident #1 discharged from Harold and Grace Upjohn Community Care Center on March 17, 2025, but the family's concerns about her care led to the September complaint that triggered the federal inspection.
The facility's shower documentation system failed its most basic test: proving that care happened when staff claimed it did. For Resident #1, that failure meant 25 days when her diabetes-related skin risks may not have been properly monitored, despite family members specifically requesting that surveillance.
The late entry progress note, written only after family complaints, raised questions about whether other undocumented care claims throughout the facility relied on similarly unreliable sources. If nurses couldn't explain where they obtained information about basic hygiene care, the accuracy of more complex medical documentation remained suspect.
Resident #1's cognitive score of 15 out of 15 meant she was fully capable of remembering and reporting whether she had received or refused showers. Yet the facility chose to rely on undocumented nurse claims rather than asking the resident directly about her experience.
The documentation failures left fundamental questions unanswered about Resident #1's 25-day stay: Did she receive the skin monitoring her diabetes required? Were her refusals properly documented and respected? Or did staff simply fail to track basic hygiene care for a medically vulnerable patient whose family had specifically raised concerns about that exact issue?
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Harold and Grace Upjohn Community Care Center from 2025-09-17 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Harold and Grace Upjohn Community Care Center
- Browse all MI nursing home inspections