Fidelity Health Care: Verbal Abuse Goes Unchecked - CA
The victim, identified as Resident 2 in the September 11 inspection report, told investigators the harassment had been "ongoing, well over a year to 1 1/2 years" before reaching a breaking point on September 5. That day, Resident 2 grabbed the harasser's neck and punched him in the stomach after being called names and having his personal space invaded.
"I heard cussing at Station 2, and it was Resident 1 yelling at the staff," Resident 2 told inspectors about the day of the incident. "The staff didn't do anything to Resident 1."
The harassment escalated when Resident 1 walked down the hallway toward Resident 2, who told him "somebody should wash your mouth out with soap." But instead of backing down, Resident 1 began speaking to Resident 2's boyfriend, a former resident of the facility.
"There you go talking to [the boyfriend] again like you know him," Resident 2 said to Resident 1, according to the inspection report.
That's when Resident 1 called Resident 2 "a fatso and crack head, and then got up close to Resident 2's personal space."
Resident 2 warned him to back away. When Resident 1 refused to move, Resident 2 stood up from the wheelchair and attacked.
Staff at Fidelity Health Care had long known about Resident 1's behavior toward other residents but took no effective action to stop it. Certified Nursing Assistant 2 told inspectors that "Resident 1 liked to tease other residents and bother them."
The aide said she told Resident 1 "to stop with his inappropriate language towards residents, but Resident 1 would do it again to other residents."
The facility's Social Services Director acknowledged the pattern during her interview with inspectors. "Resident 1 loved to tease the residents," she said. "Some [residents] will respond to him others will be quiet."
Despite being present during the September 5 incident, the Social Services Director appeared to dismiss the seriousness of what had happened. She told inspectors she asked Resident 1 what occurred, and "Resident 1 told [her] Resident 1 did nothing to Resident 2."
The facility's own staff recognized that what Resident 2 endured constituted abuse under federal regulations. Registered Nurse 2 told inspectors that "yelling at someone and saying hurtful and cruel things and teasing someone and calling the person a crack head is a form of verbal abuse."
The nurse added that "name calling was a form of abuse if the resident verbalized that he or she was not comfortable about it."
The facility's Director of Staff Development was even more direct about the violations. "Verbal abuse is not acceptable. It falls under abuse," the director told inspectors. "Verbal can mentally hurt and damage the resident's morale."
Resident 2 had complained to staff "at least 3 times about Resident 1's behavior and the inappropriate language Resident 1 used," according to the inspection report. Resident 2 told inspectors that "being called crack head all the time and taken off medications so quickly were contributing factors why Resident 2 attacked and hit Resident 1."
The facility's own policies, revised as recently as March 2025, explicitly prohibited the behavior that staff allowed to continue unchecked. The Abuse Prevention and Response Policy stated that the facility would "ensure the safety and well-being of all residents by preventing, identifying, reporting, and responding to any form of abuse, neglect, or exploitation."
The policy specifically defined verbal abuse as "any use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability."
It also defined emotional abuse as "verbal or non-verbal actions causing emotional pain or distress."
By the facility's own definitions, Resident 1's repeated harassment of Resident 2 constituted both verbal and emotional abuse. Yet despite multiple complaints from the victim and staff awareness of the ongoing problem, no effective intervention occurred.
The September 5 incident represented a predictable escalation of tensions that had been building for more than a year. Resident 2's attack on Resident 1 came only after enduring prolonged harassment while watching staff fail to protect residents from abuse.
The case illustrates how nursing homes can fail their most vulnerable residents by allowing harmful behavior to persist unchecked. While staff at Fidelity Health Care could identify verbal abuse when questioned by inspectors, they proved unable or unwilling to prevent it from occurring repeatedly over an extended period.
The inspection found that the facility violated federal regulations requiring nursing homes to ensure residents are free from abuse and to develop and implement policies to prevent, identify, and respond to abuse. The violation was classified as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm to a few residents.
For Resident 2, the failure meant enduring more than a year of verbal harassment before feeling compelled to resort to physical violence for protection. The resident's frustration was evident in the detailed account provided to inspectors about the progression of events leading to the September 5 altercation.
The incident occurred in a common area near the nursing station, where staff could hear and observe the interaction between residents. Yet despite their presence and awareness of the ongoing conflict, staff failed to intervene effectively until after the physical altercation had already taken place.
The inspection report does not indicate what disciplinary actions, if any, were taken against either resident following the September 5 incident, or what measures the facility implemented to prevent similar occurrences in the future.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Fidelity Health Care from 2025-09-11 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: Official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
Editorial process: AI-synthesized regulatory data, reviewed for accuracy by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: June 20, 2026 · Our methodology
FIDELITY HEALTH CARE in EL MONTE, CA was cited for abuse-related violations during a health inspection on September 11, 2025.
That day, Resident 2 grabbed the harasser's neck and punched him in the stomach after being called names and having his personal space invaded.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.