Manor at Perrysburg: Resident Rights Violations - OH
The violation, documented on August 21, 2025, falls under a category the government labels Resident Rights Deficiencies. The classification matters: these are not housekeeping failures or paperwork gaps. They concern the basic right of a person living in a nursing home to know what is happening to their own body, what care they are receiving, and why.
Inspectors rated the deficiency at scope and severity level D, meaning it was isolated in nature and caused no documented actual harm. But the federal rating system at that level still requires inspectors to find potential for more than minimal harm. The distinction between "no actual harm" and "no harm possible" is not a small one. A resident who does not understand their diagnosis cannot meaningfully participate in decisions about their care. A resident who does not know what medications they are taking cannot report side effects. A resident who is never told what is wrong with them cannot ask the questions that might catch a mistake.
Manor at Perrysburg reported correcting the deficiency by September 12, 2025, three weeks after the inspection closed.
The facility did not respond to a request for comment.
What the inspection report does not contain is the name of a single resident. It does not describe a specific conversation that failed to happen, a diagnosis that went unexplained, or a treatment plan that was carried out without the person at the center of it understanding what was being done or why. The narrative the government released runs to fewer than 200 words of actual finding. That brevity is itself a feature of how these inspections are sometimes recorded and released — the regulatory citation exists, but the human story behind it stays buried in the full report.
What is documented is this: at some point before August 21, at least one resident at Manor at Perrysburg was not fully informed about their health status, care, or treatments. Inspectors found it serious enough to cite. The facility, faced with that finding, did not contest it.
Thirteen deficiencies in a single inspection is a significant number. The August visit was triggered by a complaint, meaning someone — a resident, a family member, a staff member — contacted regulators before inspectors ever walked through the door. The inspection that followed turned up problems across 13 separate areas. This particular citation was one of them.
Nursing homes in Ohio, as elsewhere, are required to ensure that residents receive the information they need to make informed decisions about their care. That standard exists because the alternative — a facility where staff make decisions and residents simply receive them — is not care. It is something closer to management.
The gap between those two things is where harm tends to accumulate quietly. A resident who does not know their wound is not healing cannot ask why. A resident who does not understand that their medication was changed cannot notice when the new drug makes them feel worse. The potential for harm that federal inspectors are required to document at level D is not hypothetical in the abstract sense. It is the specific, foreseeable consequence of keeping a person uninformed about what is happening to them.
Manor at Perrysburg says it fixed the problem. The correction date it reported is September 12, three weeks after the inspection. Whether that correction reached the residents who were not being informed — whether anyone sat down with them, explained what had been missing, and made sure they understood their own care going forward — is not something the inspection report addresses.
It rarely does.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Manor At Perrysburg from 2025-08-21 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: October 10, 2026 · Our methodology
MANOR AT PERRYSBURG in PERRYSBURG, OH was cited for violations during a health inspection on August 21, 2025.
The violation, documented on August 21, 2025, falls under a category the government labels Resident Rights Deficiencies.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.