Skip to main content

Woodland Post-Acute: $188 Owed to Dead Resident's Family - CA

Healthcare Facility
Woodland Post-acute
Woodland, CA  ·  2/5 stars

Woodland Post-Acute failed to process the refund for Resident 1, who died with encephalopathy after living at the facility since 2020. The money represented a share-of-cost overpayment — the amount an individual pays toward medical services before Medi-Cal begins coverage.

The Business Office Manager told state inspectors she didn't know why the money hadn't been returned to the family. When pressed about the facility's policy during a follow-up interview, she acknowledged the money should have been returned within 60 days of the resident's death.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Administrator was more direct about the facility's failure.

"The expectation is that we follow our policy and if the policy says we should have returned the money within 60 days, then we are at fault," the Administrator told inspectors.

Business office records showed the overpayment had been sitting in the facility's accounts since the month the resident died. The Outstanding Account report revealed the Business Office Manager first heard from a complainant about the missing refund months after the 60-day window had closed.

The complainant "asked about refund for Share of Cost," according to the manager's notes from that initial contact.

Resident 1 had been admitted with encephalopathy, a condition affecting brain function. Despite the diagnosis, assessment records showed the resident maintained full cognitive understanding, scoring 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status — a score indicating complete mental capacity. The resident served as their own responsible party throughout their stay.

The facility's own policy, dated June 2023, requires overpayments to be refunded no later than 60 days from when the overpayment was identified. This timeline follows federal regulations under CMS 6037-F Final Rule.

State inspectors found the delay created potential for fiduciary abuse and violated the resident's rights. The violation affected few residents, but inspectors classified it as having minimal harm or potential for actual harm.

During concurrent interviews with both the Administrator and Business Office Manager, both officials verified the resident's death date and confirmed the money remained unreturned well beyond their policy's 60-day requirement.

The $187.97 represents a share-of-cost overpayment for medical services. Under California's Medi-Cal system, individuals must pay a predetermined amount toward their care before state insurance coverage begins. When facilities collect more than required, they must return the excess to residents or their families.

Federal regulations mandate nursing homes handle resident funds with strict accountability. Facilities must notify residents of account balances and convey funds promptly upon discharge, eviction, or death.

The inspection found no evidence the facility had attempted to contact the family about the owed money until the complainant reached out directly. Business office records showed no proactive effort to process the refund according to policy.

The Administrator's admission that the facility was "at fault" came only after inspectors documented the policy violation through record reviews and interviews with staff. The Business Office Manager's initial response suggested she was unaware of the outstanding obligation despite her role overseeing financial accounts.

The resident's cognitive assessment scores indicated they would have understood financial matters during their lifetime. The Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 falls well within the range for full mental capacity, meaning the resident likely knew about their share-of-cost payments and would have expected any overpayments to be handled properly.

Facility policy requires overpayment identification and processing within specific timeframes. The June 2023 policy directly references federal regulations requiring prompt refunds to prevent facilities from retaining resident funds improperly.

The violation occurred despite clear regulatory guidance and the facility's own written procedures. Both the Administrator and Business Office Manager acknowledged they knew the requirements but failed to follow them.

State inspectors classified this as a complaint investigation, suggesting family members or advocates contacted authorities about the missing money. The Outstanding Account report's notation about the complainant asking for the refund indicates the family had to pursue the matter directly.

The facility's failure to return the $187.97 within 60 days violated both internal policy and federal regulations governing resident funds. The Administrator's acknowledgment of fault confirmed the facility knew its obligations but failed to meet them.

The overpayment sat in facility accounts for months while the deceased resident's family waited for money that should have been returned promptly. The Business Office Manager's inability to explain the delay suggests systemic problems with financial account management.

Federal regulations exist specifically to prevent facilities from retaining resident funds improperly or indefinitely. The 60-day requirement ensures families receive owed money without lengthy delays or administrative complications.

The resident's family ultimately had to become complainants to recover money that belonged to them under both facility policy and federal law. The $187.97 remained in facility accounts until state inspectors documented the violation during their complaint investigation.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Woodland Post-acute from 2025-08-20 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources


Editorial Standards

Data source: Official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial process: AI-synthesized regulatory data, reviewed for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.

Last verified: June 20, 2026  ·  Our methodology

Quick Answer

WOODLAND POST-ACUTE in WOODLAND, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on August 20, 2025.

Woodland Post-Acute failed to process the refund for Resident 1, who died with encephalopathy after living at the facility since 2020.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at WOODLAND POST-ACUTE?
Woodland Post-Acute failed to process the refund for Resident 1, who died with encephalopathy after living at the facility since 2020.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in WOODLAND, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from WOODLAND POST-ACUTE or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 056109.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check WOODLAND POST-ACUTE's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.


Advertisement