Skip to main content

Resort Nursing Home: Staff Slapped Resident - NY

Healthcare Facility
Resort Nursing Home
Arverne, NY  ·  4/5 stars

The incident occurred August 5 at Resort Nursing Home, where Clinical Transportation Aide #1 had been providing one-on-one supervision to Resident #1 since November 2024. According to state inspection records, the aide was wheeling the resident through a hallway when the resident slapped the aide on the left side of their face.

The aide slapped back.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Registered Nurse #1 learned of the initial slap while the aide was still transporting the resident and instructed the aide to return the resident to their room. But the nurse didn't learn about the aide's retaliation until nearly two hours later, when Certified Nursing Assistant #1 reported at 1:59 PM that both the resident and aide had struck each other.

What happened next violated the facility's own abuse investigation protocols. Instead of immediately removing the aide from the resident's care, Registered Nurse #1 went to assess the situation and found the resident hugging the aide.

"Resident #1 was not fearful of Clinical Transport Aide #1 and had no emotional distress," the nurse told inspectors during an August 12 interview. The nurse found no visible injuries on the resident and observed no signs of pain.

The aide remained in the room with the resident.

Registered Nurse #1 called Registered Nurse Supervisor #1, who arrived at the unit at 2:00 PM. The supervisor also found the aide still in the resident's room and conducted their own assessment, confirming no visible injuries.

Only then did the supervisor remove the aide from the unit and schedule.

During a follow-up interview August 15, Registered Nurse #1 defended the decision not to immediately separate the aide and resident. The nurse said they observed the resident's behavior with the aide "to be same as if nothing happened" and saw "no signs of aggression" from the resident toward the aide.

But the facility's Director of Nursing disagreed with that approach when questioned by inspectors August 20.

"Registered Nurse #1 should have removed the Clinical Transportation Aide #1 when there was an allegation of abuse," the director told inspectors. The director confirmed that facility policy requires immediate removal of any staff member involved in an abuse allegation, pending investigation results.

The director acknowledged that Registered Nurse #1 had left the resident "unsupervised in their room with Clinical Transportation Aide #1" even after learning of the alleged mutual striking incident.

The aide had been providing dedicated one-on-one supervision to this particular resident for nine months before the August incident. Registered Nurse Supervisor #1 told inspectors they didn't interview other residents about potential similar incidents because the aide's assignment had been limited to this single resident.

No other staff members witnessed the alleged mutual slapping. The facility's investigation relied entirely on the aide's self-report to Registered Nurse #1 about being slapped, and Certified Nursing Assistant #1's later observation that both parties had struck each other.

The supervisor did notify the Director of Nursing, the resident's physician, and the resident's family after removing the aide from the schedule. But the delay in separating the aide and resident created what inspectors identified as a violation of state regulations requiring immediate protective action during abuse investigations.

The incident highlights the complex dynamics that can develop between residents and staff in long-term care settings, particularly when aides provide intensive one-on-one supervision over extended periods. Clinical transportation aides typically assist residents with mobility and positioning, often working closely with individuals who may have cognitive impairments or behavioral challenges.

State regulations require nursing homes to immediately separate alleged perpetrators from potential victims during abuse investigations, regardless of whether visible injuries are present or whether the resident appears comfortable with the accused staff member. The rule exists to prevent additional incidents and ensure thorough investigation without potential intimidation or influence.

Resort Nursing Home's handling of the incident demonstrated confusion among nursing staff about when and how to implement these protective measures. While both the registered nurse and supervisor assessed the resident for injuries and found none, they initially failed to follow the facility's own protocols for abuse allegations.

The registered nurse's decision to allow continued contact between the aide and resident was based on behavioral observations rather than regulatory requirements. The nurse noted the resident showed no fear or distress and appeared to maintain a normal relationship with the aide, including physical affection.

However, the Director of Nursing made clear during the inspection that such observations don't override the mandatory separation requirement. The policy exists to protect residents regardless of their apparent comfort level with accused staff members, recognizing that vulnerable residents may not always display obvious signs of distress or fear.

The case also illustrates challenges facilities face when investigating incidents involving residents who may have cognitive impairments or communication difficulties. The inspection report doesn't specify the resident's condition, but the need for continuous one-on-one supervision suggests significant care requirements.

The aide's removal from the schedule occurred only after the supervisor's arrival and independent assessment, roughly an hour after the registered nurse learned of the mutual striking allegation. During that time, the aide remained alone with the resident in their room, creating what the Director of Nursing acknowledged was an inappropriate supervision gap.

State inspectors classified the violation as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting few residents. The facility received citations under federal regulations governing abuse prevention and investigation procedures in nursing homes.

The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint, though the report doesn't specify who filed the complaint or when. The investigation took place August 12, 15, and 20, suggesting inspectors made multiple visits to interview different staff members and gather complete information about the facility's response.

Resort Nursing Home's violation demonstrates how even well-intentioned nursing staff can create regulatory problems when they prioritize their own clinical judgment over established safety protocols during abuse investigations.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Resort Nursing Home from 2025-08-20 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources


Editorial Standards

Data source: Official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial process: AI-synthesized regulatory data, reviewed for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.

Last verified: June 20, 2026  ·  Our methodology

Quick Answer

RESORT NURSING HOME in ARVERNE, NY was cited for violations during a health inspection on August 20, 2025.

According to state inspection records, the aide was wheeling the resident through a hallway when the resident slapped the aide on the left side of their face.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at RESORT NURSING HOME?
According to state inspection records, the aide was wheeling the resident through a hallway when the resident slapped the aide on the left side of their face.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in ARVERNE, NY, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from RESORT NURSING HOME or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 335199.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check RESORT NURSING HOME's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.


Advertisement