Skip to main content
Complaint Investigation

Montello Care Center

October 22, 2025 · Montello, WI · 251 Forest Lane
Citations 3
CMS Rating 1/5
Beds 50
Provider ID 525657
Healthcare Facility
Montello Care Center
Montello, WI  ·  View full profile →
Source Document
Official CMS Inspection Report (Medicare.gov)
Downloaded from CMS/Medicare.gov. Reflects what state inspectors documented and does not include the facility's plan of correction, which is submitted separately. Facilities may have taken corrective actions since this report was released.
Inspection Summary

Montello Care Center in Montello, WI — inspection on October 22, 2025.

Found 3 citations. Severity: Standard violations.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct within required timeframes. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns and are subject to follow-up verification.

Inspection Findings

FF0609
Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

not let R1 leave the facility. SGT-I informed the writer that staff were holding R1 in a chair when

incident was related to R1's increase in behaviors. NHA-A stated R1 did not elope from the facility and

interviews with staff who worked the night of the incident and only had statements that were obtained by law enforcement. NHA-A had not obtained the county crisis documentation that indicated staff held R1 in a chair or the police report that indicated R1 alleged that R1 was attacked by numerous individuals. NHA-A acknowledged the allegations of abuse should have been reported to the SA.

525657 10/22/2025

Montello Care Center 251 Forest Lane Montello, WI 53949

blocked the doors. CNA-G indicated one staff was outside of the doors that R1 tried to open. CNA-G

similar situations and instructed staff to give R1 space. R1 stated R1 didn't know anyone and was

statements, however, facility staff did not ask CNA-G for a statement. CNA-G indicated CNA-G worked 3 or 4 days after the incident but did not receive education post incident or prior to working CNA-G's next shift.On 10/13/25 at 11:50 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA-E who provided care to R1 on the evening of 9/25/25 when R1 started to become agitated. CNA-E was injured by R1 during the incident.

Surveyor noted a statement from CNA-E was not included in the police report or the facility's investigation.On 10/14/25 at 3:05 PM, Surveyor interviewed [NAME] (CK)-J via phone who indicated CK-J heard yelling and saw R1 enter the dining room on 9/25/25. R1 yelled at the CNAs and was followed by 2 to 4 CNAs to ensure R1 did not elope. R1 attempted to elope out the dining room door; however, CK-J stood between R1 and the door.

When R1 left the dining room, multiple CNAs followed R1 from door to door as R1 attempted to leave the facility. CK-J stated one CNA stood between R1 and the door to ensure R1 did not elope. R1 eventually sat in the lobby and CK-J stood behind R1.

CK-J's hands were on the back of R1's chair as CK-J tried to calm R1 down.

When asked what R1 yelled when R1 entered the dining room, CK-J stated R1 yelled, I want to leave.

Why won't you let me leave? CK-J stated CK-J left when law enforcement arrived because CK-J's shift had ended. CK-J was not asked for a statement regarding the incident.Surveyor also noted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-L worked the evening of 9/25/25; however, a statement from LPN-L was not included in the police report or the facility's investigation.

Surveyor attempted to call LPN-L but did receive a return call. On 10/13/25 at 11:20 AM, Surveyor interviewed NHA-A who indicated NHA-A had been at the facility earlier in the day on 9/25/25 and R1 had no issues. NHA-A indicated NHA-A did not complete staff interviews post incident and thought DON-B had done so. On 10/13/25 at 1:10 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON-B who indicated DON-B did not obtain staff statements; however, the facility had copies of staff statements provided to law enforcement on the night of the incident.On 10/13/25 at 3:51 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA-A who was unaware that staff had blocked exit doors or potentially put hands on R1. NHA-A indicated NHA-A had not obtained the police report or the county crisis report. NHA-A acknowledged the facility should have completed staff interviews. NHA-A confirmed the facility completed an internal investigation which included resident interviews and an updated process to ensure residents being admitted do not have a history of violence. NHA-A indicated the facility was in the process of completing staff education on the facility's updated Unmanageable Resident policy.

525657 10/22/2025

Montello Care Center 251 Forest Lane Montello, WI 53949

stood between R1 and the door.

When R1 left the dining room, multiple CNAs followed R1 from door to

ensure R1 did not elope. R1 eventually sat in the lobby and CK-J stood behind R1. CK-J's hands were

but did not witness it.

When asked what R1 yelled when R1 entered the dining room, CK-J stated R1 yelled, I want to leave.

Why won't you let me leave? CK-J stated R1 was half naked and it was dark.

CK-J received training post-incident that if a resident wants to leave, staff should let the resident leave, follow them with a phone, and contact emergency medical services (EMS). CK-J was not asked to provide a statement about the incident and left when the police arrived. A police report, dated 9/25/25, indicated Sergeant (SGT)-I entered the facility and was directed to the main area near the nurses' station in the central part of the building on the north side. SGT-I observed numerous staff crying, out of breath, and disheveled. R1 was shirtless and seated in a chair. A person standing behind R1 appeared to be there to ensure R1 did not leave the chair. SGT-I was told by multiple staff that R1 had dementia and attempted to elope; however, staff stopped R1 from leaving. R1 struck, kicked, punched, and threw staff into door frames and walls. SGT-I attempted to talk to R1, however, R1 could not formulate sentences and appeared confused. At one point, R1 indicated to SGT-I that R1 was attacked by numerous individuals at the facility. On 10/13/25, Surveyor obtained county crisis documentation related to the incident.

The documentation indicated SGT-I was called to the facility for a disorderly resident (R1) who had dementia. SGT-I reported that R1 became violent when staff would not let R1 leave the facility. SGT-I informed the writer that staff were holding R1 in a chair when SGT-I arrived citing safety concerns.On 10/13/25 at 3:41 PM, Surveyor interviewed SGT-I via phone. SGT-I was told staff put hands on R1 during the incident but were not holding R1 down when SGT-I arrived. SGT-I thought staff stated they had to block exits to prevent R1 from exiting the building. SGT-I indicated it was cool outside and R1 was not wearing a shirt. If R1 had eloped, SGT-I stated dogs or [NAME] may have been required to find R1. On 10/13/25 at 1:44 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON-B via phone. DON-B arrived at the facility after the police. DON-B indicated R1 was rocking in a chair in the lobby and appeared upset. R1 became upset when CNA-E attempted to change R1's clothing at bedtime and said only R1's spouse did that. CNA-E backed off, however, R1 wanted to go home. DON-B completed a skin check for R1's visible skin and observed no injuries.

DON-B did not obtain staff statements since the facility had staff statements from the police investigation. DON-B heard multiple accounts of what occurred but was not aware that staff blocked doors and put hands on R1. DON-B stated staff should not have physically restrained R1 or held doors shut. DON-B stated staff education was provided on what to do for an unmanageable resident and thought most nursing staff were trained. On 10/13/25 at 3:51 PM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A who was not aware that staff blocked doors or placed hands on R1. NHA-A indicated the facility had staff statements from the police investigation but initially thought DON-B had obtained statements. NHA-A had not received the police report and was not aware of the County Crisis Line (APSA) report. NHA-A confirmed staff were being trained on how to handle unmanageable residents and stated the facility was completing internal things; however, NHA-A was not finished with everything yet.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an F-tag violation?
F-tags are federal deficiency codes used by CMS to categorize nursing home violations. Each F-tag corresponds to a specific federal regulation (42 CFR Part 483). For example, F607 relates to abuse prevention policies, F880 relates to infection control.
Were these violations corrected?
Facilities must submit plans of correction and implement changes within required timeframes. CMS conducts follow-up inspections to verify corrections. Check the inspection report for specific correction dates and follow-up verification status.
How often do nursing home inspections happen?
CMS conducts unannounced inspections of all Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes at least once per year. Additional inspections may occur based on complaints, facility-reported incidents, or follow-up to verify previous violations were corrected.
What should families do about these violations?
Families should: (1) Review the full inspection report for details, (2) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspections, (4) Compare with other facilities in Montello, WI, (5) Report new concerns to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
Complete inspection reports are available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request copies directly from Montello Care Center or from the state Department of Health. Reports include deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines.


More Reports

About This Inspection Report

Source: This inspection report was downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases nursing home inspection reports in bulk. The findings reflect what state surveyors documented in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies on the date of the inspection.

Plan of correction not included: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to their state survey agency and those responses may not appear in CMS public data at the time of release. The absence of a plan of correction in this report does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken by the facility are encouraged to contact the facility or their state survey agency directly.

Corrections may have been made: This report reflects conditions observed on the date of the survey. The facility may have implemented staffing changes, additional training, policy revisions, or other corrective actions since this report was issued. We publish what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.