Regency Health And Rehabilitation Center
REGENCY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER in YORKTOWN, VA — inspection on October 22, 2025.
Found 2 citations. Severity: Standard violations.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct within required timeframes. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns and are subject to follow-up verification.
Inspection Findings
monitoring and treatment for Resident #3. As the wound healed with available measures once they were instituted, it was agreed that the wound was avoidable.
The facility staff stated they had nothing further to provide.
Facility ID:
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
A.
Building
COMPLETED
10/22/2025
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Regency Health and Rehabilitation Center
112 N Constitution Dr Yorktown, VA 23692
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
8-28-25, 8-29-25, 9-1-25, on 9-11-25 the Resident went out to hospital, and returned on 9-12-25.
Treatments were not administered 9-12-25 through 9-24-25 (12 days), 9-27-25, 9-28-25, 9-29-25, 10-2-25, and 10-5-25.
Treatments to the sacral pressure ulcer were discontinued on 10-6-25 as the wound was healed and remained healed at the time of survey.
Braden skin assessments typically completed on admission for risk of wound development were only completed twice for this Resident.
Those 2 were completed late, as the first one was completed on 10-14-25, which scored a 10 high risk and the only other one on 10-22-25 a 12 high risk. On 10-22-25 at 11:00 a.m. LPN (B) was interviewed stated We keep those skin checks documented on the weekly skin integrity review sheets.
She was asked where the measurements were and stated they were on the pressure ulcer records and that the measurements were in centimeters.
She was asked to supply all of them since admission.
She supplied her own document created by her and the NP to keep track of all wounds in the facility. It was not part of the clinical record.
LPN (B) went on to say the pressure ulcer was not present on admission to this facility and occurred after the Resident was admitted .
She was asked why some nursing notes revealed the wound on Resident #3's sacrum and some documented no wound at all.
She stated that it was an error.
The Facility policy on skin assessment revealed that assessments will be completed on each resident weekly and would be documented in the clinical record. No skin assessments were documented for Resident #3 until 9-5-25 when the NP wound nurse completed her evaluation.On 10-22-25 at 2:30 p.m. during the end of day conference, the Administrator, DON, Corporate Registered Nurse consultant and Corporate Administrator of Operations were made aware of missing evidence of consistent and accurate skin care assessments, available prevention techniques, and wound care monitoring and treatment for Resident #3. As the wound healed with available measures once they were instituted, it was agreed that the wound was avoidable.
The facility staff stated they had nothing further to provide.
Facility ID: