Skip to main content
Advertisement
Complaint Investigation

Regency Health And Rehabilitation Center

Inspection Date: October 22, 2025
Total Violations 2
Facility ID 495189
Location YORKTOWN, VA
Advertisement

Inspection Findings

F-Tag F0686

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Harm Level: Potential for More Than Minimal Harm

F 0686 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm

monitoring and treatment for Resident #3. As the wound healed with available measures once they were instituted, it was agreed that the wound was avoidable. The facility staff stated they had nothing further to provide.

Residents Affected - Few

FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete

Event ID:

Facility ID:

If continuation sheet

Printed: 04/13/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391

Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION

(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:

(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION

B. Wing

A. Building

(X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED

10/22/2025

NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER

STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE

Regency Health and Rehabilitation Center

112 N Constitution Dr Yorktown, VA 23692

For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG

SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)

Advertisement

F-Tag F0842

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Harm Level: Potential for More Than Minimal Harm

F 0842 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few

FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete

8-28-25, 8-29-25, 9-1-25, on 9-11-25 the Resident went out to hospital, and returned on 9-12-25.

Treatments were not administered 9-12-25 through 9-24-25 (12 days), 9-27-25, 9-28-25, 9-29-25, 10-2-25, and 10-5-25. Treatments to the sacral pressure ulcer were discontinued on 10-6-25 as the wound was healed and remained healed at the time of survey. Braden skin assessments typically completed on admission for risk of wound development were only completed twice for this Resident. Those 2 were completed late, as the first one was completed on 10-14-25, which scored a 10 high risk and the only other one on 10-22-25 a 12 high risk. On 10-22-25 at 11:00 a.m. LPN (B) was interviewed stated We keep those skin checks documented on the weekly skin integrity review sheets. She was asked where the measurements were and stated they were on the pressure ulcer records and that the measurements were

in centimeters. She was asked to supply all of them since admission. She supplied her own document created by her and the NP to keep track of all wounds in the facility. It was not part of the clinical record.

LPN (B) went on to say the pressure ulcer was not present on admission to this facility and occurred after

the Resident was admitted . She was asked why some nursing notes revealed the wound on Resident #3's sacrum and some documented no wound at all. She stated that it was an error. The Facility policy on skin assessment revealed that assessments will be completed on each resident weekly and would be documented in the clinical record. No skin assessments were documented for Resident #3 until 9-5-25 when the NP wound nurse completed her evaluation.On 10-22-25 at 2:30 p.m. during the end of day conference, the Administrator, DON, Corporate Registered Nurse consultant and Corporate Administrator of Operations were made aware of missing evidence of consistent and accurate skin care assessments, available prevention techniques, and wound care monitoring and treatment for Resident #3. As the wound healed with available measures once they were instituted, it was agreed that the wound was avoidable. The facility staff stated they had nothing further to provide.

Event ID:

Facility ID:

If continuation sheet

📋 Inspection Summary

REGENCY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER in YORKTOWN, VA inspection on recent inspection.

Found 0 violation(s). Severity: Standard violations. Status: 0 corrected, 0 pending.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. All deficiencies must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an F-tag violation?
F-tags are federal deficiency codes used by CMS to categorize nursing home violations. Each F-tag corresponds to a specific federal regulation (42 CFR Part 483). For example, F607 relates to abuse prevention policies, F880 relates to infection control.
Were these violations corrected?
Facilities must submit plans of correction and implement changes within required timeframes. CMS conducts follow-up inspections to verify corrections. Check the inspection report for specific correction dates and follow-up verification status.
How often do nursing home inspections happen?
CMS conducts unannounced inspections of all Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes at least once per year. Additional inspections may occur based on complaints, facility-reported incidents, or follow-up to verify previous violations were corrected.
What should families do about these violations?
Families should: (1) Review the full inspection report for details, (2) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspections, (4) Compare with other facilities in YORKTOWN, VA, (5) Report new concerns to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
Complete inspection reports are available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request copies directly from REGENCY HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER or from the state Department of Health. Reports include deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines.
« Back to Facility Page
Advertisement
Advertisement