Skip to main content
Advertisement
Complaint Investigation

Weslaco Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Inspection Date: November 19, 2025
Total Violations 2
Facility ID 676037
Location WESLACO, TX
Advertisement

Inspection Findings

F-Tag F0684

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Harm Level: Potential for More Than Minimal Harm

F 0684 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few

FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete

incident report about the skin tear, but she did not conduct a full head-to-toe assessment on the resident.

The MDSN stated she thought the charge nurse was going to conduct a full head-to-toe assessment on the resident. The MDSN stated it was important to do a full head-to-toe assessment on a resident after a new skin tear or wound was found to ensure there was not any other damage to the resident. In an interview with LVN B at 4:28 PM on 11/18/25, LVN B stated she was the charge nurse for Resident #2 on 10/22/25.

LVN B stated she remembered the MDSN told her about the skin tear on Resident #2 on 10/22/25. LVN B stated she thought the MDSN was just informing her about the skin tear, and not that it had just been found.

LVN B stated she thought the skin tear had been found on a previous shift. LVN B stated she did not perform a full head-to-toe skin assessment on Resident #2 on 10/22/25. LVN B stated it was important to do a full head-to-toe assessment on a resident after a new skin tear was found to ensure there were no other new wounds. In an interview with the DON at 5:28 PM on 11/18/25, the DON stated Resident #2 should have had a full head-to-toe skin assessment on 10/22/25 immediately after the new skin tear was found. The DON stated Resident #2 did receive treatment for her skin tear and it looked a lot better now than it did before. The DON stated it was important to conduct the assessment to see if new orders were needed and to examine the extent of the damage. Record review of the facility's policy Skin Assessment, dated 4/24/25, reflected the following policies: .7. Documentation of skin assessment:a. Include date and time of the assessment, your name, and position title.b. Documents observations.c. Document type of wound.d. Describe wound (measurements, color, type of tissue in wound bed, drainage, odor, pain).e.

Documents if resident refused assessment and why.f. Document other information as indicated or appropriate.

Event ID:

Facility ID:

If continuation sheet

Printed: 04/13/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391

Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION

(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:

(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION

B. Wing

A. Building

(X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED

11/19/2025

NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER

STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE

Weslaco Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

422 E 18th St Weslaco, TX 78596

For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG

SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)

Advertisement

F-Tag F0760

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Harm Level: Potential for More Than Minimal Harm

F 0760

Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.

Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on

interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to hold administration of Resident #1's nifedipine (blood pressure medication) when Resident #2's blood pressure was outside parameters on 10/01/25. This failure could place residents at risk for complications due to discomfort or their health being jeopardized.The findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/13/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 07/10/23 and current admission date of 03/21/24. Resident #1's pertinent diagnosis included Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure with no known specific cause). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/01/25, reflected a BIMS score of 12 which indicated moderate impairment. Record

review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan, dated 11/13/25, reflected the problem [Resident #1] has hypertension initiated on 07/12/23 and revised on 02/25/24. An intervention listed for the problem included Give anti hypertensive medications as ordered. initiated on 07/12/23 and revised on 02/25/24. Record

review of Resident #1's order summary reflected an active order for Nifedipine Extended Release 90 mg Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension hold if SBP <100 or HR <60, notify nurse initiated

on 03/21/24. Record review of Resident #1's MAR from October 2025 reflected on 10/01/25 Resident #1's blood pressure was measured at 155/66 while her HR was measured at 56. Further review reflected nifedipine ER 90 mg was administered on 10/01/25 by LVN A after the heart rate was measured to be outside of ordered parameters. In an interview with LVN A at 11:48 AM on 11/13/25, LVN A stated before administering blood pressure medications she always measured the resident's blood pressure and heart rate. LVN A stated if the resident's heart rate or blood pressure was outside of the ordered parameters on

the medication she would hold the medication and inform the charge nurse. LVN A stated it was important to follow the doctor's orders because administering medication outside of the parameters may harm the resident. LVN A stated she did not remember specifically if she notified the nurse and got the okay to administer the nifedipine to Resident #1 on 10/01/25. In an interview with the DON at 12:06 PM on 11/13/25, the DON stated a resident's blood pressure and heart rate were measured before administering blood pressure medication. The DON stated if a resident's heart rate or blood pressure was outside parameters for a medication the nurse should hold the medication and notify the nurse or physician depending on the order. The DON stated the nifedipine should not have been administered to Resident #1

on 10/01/25 unless LVN A had been given the go ahead by the nurse or physician. The DON stated there was no documentation that LVN A had talked to the nurse or physician about nifedipine on 10/01/25. The DON stated it was important to follow doctor's orders on blood pressure medications to protect residents from negative effects like weakness, lethargy, and dizziness. Record review of the facility's policy Medication Administration, dated 10/24/22, reflected the following policies: .8. Obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medication for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters.14. Administer medication as ordered in accordance with manufacturer specifications.

Residents Affected - Few

FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete

Event ID:

Facility ID:

If continuation sheet

📋 Inspection Summary

WESLACO NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER in WESLACO, TX inspection on recent inspection.

Found 0 violation(s). Severity: Standard violations. Status: 0 corrected, 0 pending.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. All deficiencies must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an F-tag violation?
F-tags are federal deficiency codes used by CMS to categorize nursing home violations. Each F-tag corresponds to a specific federal regulation (42 CFR Part 483). For example, F607 relates to abuse prevention policies, F880 relates to infection control.
Were these violations corrected?
Facilities must submit plans of correction and implement changes within required timeframes. CMS conducts follow-up inspections to verify corrections. Check the inspection report for specific correction dates and follow-up verification status.
How often do nursing home inspections happen?
CMS conducts unannounced inspections of all Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes at least once per year. Additional inspections may occur based on complaints, facility-reported incidents, or follow-up to verify previous violations were corrected.
What should families do about these violations?
Families should: (1) Review the full inspection report for details, (2) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspections, (4) Compare with other facilities in WESLACO, TX, (5) Report new concerns to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
Complete inspection reports are available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request copies directly from WESLACO NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER or from the state Department of Health. Reports include deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines.
« Back to Facility Page
Advertisement
Advertisement