Skip to main content
Advertisement
Complaint Investigation

Northeast Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Inspection Date: October 17, 2025
Total Violations 2
Facility ID 455754
Location SAN ANTONIO, TX
Advertisement

Inspection Findings

F-Tag F0684

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Harm Level: Immediate Jeopardy

F 0684 Level of Harm - Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety Residents Affected - Few

FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete

facility did not correlate her death to the fall. The DON stated her expectation for an unwitnessed fall was always neuro checks and notification of the family and the physician. She stated if they hit their head, neuros. She stated if there was any deviation in neuros, they should notify the physician. The DON stated

she was aware Resident #7 hit her head, and they did neuro checks. She stated for a resident on anti-coagulants they tell the physician and let them decide. The DON said the facility did not have a policy to send the resident out to the hospital. She stated she did not know why some staff thought that was their policy. She said that had not been taught. She stated she had not spoken with Resident #7's physician about her fall or her death but knew he was aware because it was a required notification. The DON stated if LVN C had gotten an order to send out (to the hospital) then she should have sent the resident out, but she was not aware of it. The DON stated she was aware Resident #7 was bickering over TV volume with another resident. She stated a staff member (unknown) had asked if she could move the resident and she said yes. The DON stated that was not something the physician would need to be notified of. She stated

they had moved Resident #7 a few times because she would [NAME] with roommates and that was not a change of condition. The DON stated staff had been trained on de-escalation and redirection of residents, fall prevention training, and abuse and neglect (dates unknown). The DON stated this surveyor would need to speak with the Medical Director instead of the resident's physician. During an interview on [DATE REDACTED] at 4:08 p.m., the Medical Director stated Resident #7's physician was not available and her providers were not allowed to be interviewed unless she was present. She stated she looked through the call center log and

they had been notified when the fall happened. She stated they (facility) had been given orders to monitor for neuros. The Medical Director stated the representative for the physician's office notified her (on [DATE REDACTED])

she incorrectly stated (when interviewed) that there was an order to send the resident out to the hospital.

The Medical Director stated she listened to the call (original call on the date of fall) and the RN just gave orders to monitor and do neuro checks and no orders to send to the hospital. The Medical Director stated there was no one-set of professional standards of practice for when a resident had an unwitnessed fall, hit their head, and was on anticoagulants. She stated it would depend on the si[TRUNCATED]

Event ID:

Facility ID:

If continuation sheet

Printed: 04/13/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391

Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION

(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:

(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION

B. Wing

A. Building

(X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED

10/17/2025

NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER

STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE

Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

603 Corinne St San Antonio, TX 78218

For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG

SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)

Advertisement

F-Tag F0842

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Harm Level: Potential for More Than Minimal Harm

F 0842 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few

FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete

she moved her to a different room across the hall. She stated it was verbal aggression and nothing physical had occurred. She stated both roommates were lying in bed, but Resident #7 just wouldn't stop. She wanted to fight with her roommate. LVN D stated they tried getting her to stop, she tried to close the curtain, but she declined to go to sleep and kept pulling the curtain over. LVN D stated she asked the roommate not to engage, but it continued so she decided to make the room change. LVN D stated after the room change Resident #7 was calm. She stated she did not document the verbal aggression and did not document the room change because as soon as the resident was moved to a new room, she was calm. She stated she also did not think about documenting it because it was just two roommates arguing. She stated she should have documented it in the medical record. During an interview on 10/14/2025 at 3:34 p.m., the DON stated

she reviewed the SBAR documentation by LVN C. She stated every fall triggered a separate UDA [SH4] that should have been completed. She stated the SBAR was a new form for the staff, and she thought maybe it was misunderstood by staff and that was why it was incorrectly documented as not clinically significant. The DON stated a skin/injury assessment should be documented after a fall and a pain assessment should be documented. The DON stated the word monitor was not a specific MD order. She stated if the doctor said something specific, they would add it as an order. She stated the SBAR checklist was the order or the place to document back what the physician response was to the notification. She stated LVN C marking other and na for orders should have been more specific. During an interview on 10/15/2025 at 4:11 p.m., the DON stated they document exceptions and they were required to follow up with expectations with what intervention was put in place. She stated they put a note for the intervention in

the medical record. The DON stated Resident #7 was unhappy with the TV being too loud with her roommate and needing to be moved was not a reason to document. The DON stated Resident #7 did not have a family to notify about the move, so no notification was required to be documented. The DON stated what should be documented included any change of condition, and behaviors that required interventions, any complaints from the resident such as pain, any refusals, any changes from baseline. She stated it was important to document in the medical record so monitoring and interventions were in place. Record review of the facility's policy titled Administration-Content of Medical Records last revised August 2007 revealed: All physicians, nursing staff and other health care professionals involved in the resident's care will be responsible for making prompt, appropriate entries in the record. 6. List of contents of the medical record: Licensed Nurses Notes, other assessments ( .bowel and bladder, skin, etc.)

Event ID:

Facility ID:

If continuation sheet

📋 Inspection Summary

NORTHEAST REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER in SAN ANTONIO, TX inspection on recent inspection.

Found 0 violation(s). Severity: Standard violations. Status: 0 corrected, 0 pending.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. All deficiencies must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an F-tag violation?
F-tags are federal deficiency codes used by CMS to categorize nursing home violations. Each F-tag corresponds to a specific federal regulation (42 CFR Part 483). For example, F607 relates to abuse prevention policies, F880 relates to infection control.
Were these violations corrected?
Facilities must submit plans of correction and implement changes within required timeframes. CMS conducts follow-up inspections to verify corrections. Check the inspection report for specific correction dates and follow-up verification status.
How often do nursing home inspections happen?
CMS conducts unannounced inspections of all Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes at least once per year. Additional inspections may occur based on complaints, facility-reported incidents, or follow-up to verify previous violations were corrected.
What should families do about these violations?
Families should: (1) Review the full inspection report for details, (2) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspections, (4) Compare with other facilities in SAN ANTONIO, TX, (5) Report new concerns to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
Complete inspection reports are available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request copies directly from NORTHEAST REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. Reports include deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines.
« Back to Facility Page
Advertisement
Advertisement