Robert Lee Care Center
Inspection Findings
F-Tag F0656
F 0656 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured. **NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addressed Resident #31's behaviors.
This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their needs.Findings included: Record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 12/31/25, revealed admission on [DATE REDACTED] to the facility. Diagnoses included dementia with psychotic disturbance, delusions, hallucinations, and depression. Record review of Resident #31's quarterly MDS dated [DATE REDACTED], revealed a BIMS score of 2 indicating severe cognitive impairment and disorganized thinking was also coded in this section. Mood was not coded. Behaviors section E - Rejection of care and wandering were both coded as a 1 which indicated these behaviors occurred 1 to 3 days during this look back period. Record review of Resident #31's Care Plan dated 4/16/2025, revealed there was no focus, goal, or intervention section for Resident #31's history of wandering or rejection of care. During an interview on 12/31/25 at 1:45 PM, with the DON she stated these behaviors should have been care planned because it was part of the resident's behavior and needed to be documented. The DON stated the MDS department was responsible for ensuring that it was care planned.
The DON stated the purpose of the care plan was to provide the care for the resident and for everyone to know what the resident needed. The DON stated that it was necessary for the care of the resident. During
an interview on 12/31/25 at 2:29 PM, with the MDS coordinator, she stated it was the responsibility of the MDS department to ensure the care plans were correct. The MDS coordinator stated there was no wandering or rejection of care, care planned for Resident #31. The MDS coordinator stated it should have been care planned for Resident #31's wandering to be able to keep an eye on her. The MDS coordinator stated the purpose of the care plan was to notify the staff of Resident #31's behaviors. The MDS coordinator stated the risk could be needs not being met. Record review of the facility Care Planning policy dated 03/2022, revealed 1. The IDT in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident.7.
The comprehensive person-centered care plan:b. Describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided. For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date
these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.
LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE
TITLE
(X6) DATE
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Event ID:
Printed: 04/13/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED
12/31/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Robert Lee Care Center
307 West 8th St Robert Lee, TX 76945
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F-Tag F0689
F 0689 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete
sure about the consequences, but it could hurt the shoulder. PTA E stated she did see the aides transfer by hooking under the arms. PTA E said she did not usually transfer residents by the waistband of their pants.
Interview on 12/31/2025 at 10:02 AM the PT stated a safe two-person gait-belt transfer looked like someone in front of the resident and someone behind the resident controlling the transfer from the resident's hips. The PT stated the therapy department did not do specific training with the aides on how to do a transfer, but they did talk to the aides constantly about what kind of transfer a resident needed. The PT said aides did not want to lift residents by the shoulders because the aides needed more control and it was not safe. The PT said aides needed to be careful with the arms because it could pull or dislocate the arm.
The PT said using the gait belt in front and grabbing the waistband was not the safest and did not give enough control. Interview on 12/31/2025 at 10:21 AM the DON stated the facility did train aides to complete
a two person gait belt transfer. The DON stated they trained the staff to have one staff in front and one staff behind to assist with the stand and pivot maneuver. Observation on 12/31/2025 at 10:27 AM CNA C and CNA D demonstrated a two-person gait-belt transfer on the DON. The CNAs placed the gait belt around DON's waist. Each held the gait-belt in the back and assisted the DON to stand by holding the DON's forearm. The CNAs completed the sitting transfers also by holding the DON's forearm. Interview on 12/31/2025 at 10:29 AM the DON stated the ADON did train the aides to complete the transfer that way.
The DON said the ADON was out of town on vacation and unable to be reached. The DON said aides were instructed not to pull or tug on the residents' arms. The DON said hooking an arm under the resident's arm was uncomfortable could cause skin tears and bruising and it was not a safe transfer. The DON stated grabbing a resident by the waistband could cause a wedgie and was not comfortable. The DON said the consequence of holding a resident under the arm could cause injury like skin tears or bruising. The DON said the facility did a skills fair training where they checked aides off on two-person gait-belt transfers. The DON said the purpose of the gait belt was to slow down a fall. The DON said transfers were not continuously monitored. The DON said the ADON and charge nurses were responsible for keeping an eye
on transfers. Review of the facility's policy and procedure on Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, revised 7/2017, revealed: In order to protect the safety and wellbeing of staff and residents, and to promote quality of care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents.Resident safety, dignity, comfort, and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents. Review of the Training Inservice Summary for Skills Fair, completed 5/27/25, revealed the facility in-serviced staff for annual compliance and competency training. CNAs were trained in mechanical lifting and incontinent care. Methodology included lectures, handouts, and demonstration with a hands on skills training.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Printed: 04/13/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED
12/31/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Robert Lee Care Center
307 West 8th St Robert Lee, TX 76945
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F-Tag F0726
F 0726 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete
under a resident's arm was not supposed to be done during transfers. PTA E said she was not sure about
the consequences, but it could hurt the shoulder. PTA E stated she did see the aides transfer by hooking under the arms. PTA E said she did not usually transfer residents by the waistband of their pants. Interview
on 12/31/2025 at 10:02 AM the PT stated a safe two-person gait-belt transfer looked like someone in front of the resident and someone behind the resident controlling the transfer from the resident's hips. The PT stated the therapy department did not do specific training with the aides on how to do a transfer, but they did talk to the aides constantly about what kind of transfer a resident needed. The PT said aides did not want to lift residents by the shoulders because the aides needed more control and it was not safe. The PT said aides needed to be careful with the arms because it could pull or dislocate the arm. The PT said using
the gait belt in front and grabbing the waistband was not the safest and did not give enough control.
Interview on 12/31/2025 at 10:21 AM the DON stated the facility did train aides to complete a two person gait belt transfer. The DON stated they trained the staff to have one staff in front and one staff behind to assist with the stand and pivot maneuver. Observation on 12/31/2025 at 10:27 AM CNA C and CNA D demonstrated a two-person gait-belt transfer on the DON. The CNAs placed the gait belt around DON's waist. Each held the gait-belt in the back and assisted the DON to stand by holding the DON's forearm. The CNAs completed the sitting transfers also by holding the DON's forearm. Interview on 12/31/2025 at 10:29 AM the DON stated the ADON did train the aides to complete the transfer that way. The DON said the ADON was out of town on vacation and unable to be reached. The DON said aides were instructed not to pull or tug on the residents' arms. The DON said hooking an arm under the resident's arm was uncomfortable could cause skin tears and bruising and it was not a safe transfer. The DON stated grabbing
a resident by the waistband could cause a wedgie and was not comfortable. The DON said the consequence of holding a resident under the arm could cause injury like skin tears or bruising. The DON said the facility did a skills fair training where they checked aides off on two-person gait-belt transfers. The DON said the purpose of the gait belt was to slow down a fall. The DON said transfers were not continuously monitored. The DON said the ADON and charge nurses were responsible for keeping an eye
on transfers. Review of the facility's policy and procedure on Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, revised 7/2017, revealed: In order to protect the safety and wellbeing of staff and residents, and to promote quality of care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents.Resident safety, dignity, comfort, and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents. Review of the Training Inservice Summary for Skills Fair, completed 5/27/25, revealed the facility in-serviced staff for annual compliance and competency training. CNAs were trained in mechanical lifting and incontinent care. Methodology included lectures, handouts, and demonstration with a hands on skills training.
Event ID:
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
ROBERT LEE CARE CENTER in ROBERT LEE, TX inspection on recent inspection.
Found 0 violation(s). Severity: Standard violations. Status: 0 corrected, 0 pending.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is an F-tag violation?
- F-tags are federal deficiency codes used by CMS to categorize nursing home violations. Each F-tag corresponds to a specific federal regulation (42 CFR Part 483). For example, F607 relates to abuse prevention policies, F880 relates to infection control.
- Were these violations corrected?
- Facilities must submit plans of correction and implement changes within required timeframes. CMS conducts follow-up inspections to verify corrections. Check the inspection report for specific correction dates and follow-up verification status.
- How often do nursing home inspections happen?
- CMS conducts unannounced inspections of all Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes at least once per year. Additional inspections may occur based on complaints, facility-reported incidents, or follow-up to verify previous violations were corrected.
- What should families do about these violations?
- Families should: (1) Review the full inspection report for details, (2) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspections, (4) Compare with other facilities in ROBERT LEE, TX, (5) Report new concerns to state authorities.
- Where can I see the full inspection report?
- Complete inspection reports are available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request copies directly from ROBERT LEE CARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. Reports include deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines.