Skip to main content
Complaint Investigation

Capstone Healthcare Of Daingerfield

May 26, 2026 · Daingerfield, TX · 507 E W M Watson Blvd
Citations 1
CMS Rating 1/5
Beds 106
Provider ID 675755
Healthcare Facility
Capstone Healthcare Of Daingerfield
Daingerfield, TX  ·  View full profile →
Source Document
Official CMS Inspection Report (Medicare.gov)
Downloaded from CMS/Medicare.gov. Reflects what state inspectors documented and does not include the facility's plan of correction, which is submitted separately. Facilities may have taken corrective actions since this report was released.
Inspection Summary

Capstone Healthcare of Daingerfield in Daingerfield, TX — inspection on May 26, 2026.

Found 1 citation. Severity: Standard violations.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct within required timeframes. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns and are subject to follow-up verification.

Inspection Findings

FF0600
Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

COTA N, PTA P, ST O, Maintenance Supervisor H, and Activity Director verbalized in-service education was provided after the incident with Resident #1.

The staff stated they were provided education on sexual abuse to include types of sexual abuse, signs and symptoms of sexual abuse, reporting allegations of sexual abuse immediately to the Administrator (Abuse Coordinator).

The staff were provided pictures of Visitor A and his vehicle.

They were instructed he was not allowed on the property and if he was noticed on the property to notify the police and administration immediately.

The staff were in-served on the visitor sign-in procedure.

They were able to verbalize all visitor were to sign-in at the front using the kiosk.

The staff said the visitor were to wear a sticker badge visible at all times while visiting.

The staff stated if a visitor did not have a sticker badge, then they were to escort them to the front and assist them with getting one.

The staff stated the secured unit code was changed and was not to be given to visitors.

The staff were instructed to escort visitors to and from the secured unit.

During an interview on 05/26/26 at 12:29 p.m., the DON stated on 05/17/26 she received a call from the facility that Visitor A was found with his pants down Resident #1's pants.

She stated she was told the staff had try to stop him from leaving but he took off. LVN E and RN F followed him outside and was able to get a license plate number.

She stated she instructed the nurses to call the police and she called the Administrator, who was the abuse coordinator, and the Regional Compliance Nurse.

She stated LVN E and RN F completed a head to toe skin assessment and a trauma assessment, which was negative for findings.

She stated the family and Medical Director were notified.

The Administrator completed the self-report to the state.

The DON stated she started in-service education on the abuse and neglect policy, sexual abuse, visitor sign-in, changed code of the secured unit, and Visitor A being banned from the facility, which included pictures.

She stated the staff rearranged the furniture of the secured unit.

The management staff conducted an ad hoc quality assurance meeting.

Safe surveys were conducted and there were no other issues identified.

During an interview on 05/26/26 at 12:40 p.m., the Administrator stated the DON called him on 05/17/26 to report the incident with Visitor A and Resident #1. He stated they immediately contacted their regional supervisors and decided to report the incident to the state and complete an investigation. He said the facility had already been notified to contact the police. He said Visitor A had left the building, and the cops responded to the facility.

They obtained statements from the nursing staff. He said Resident #1 was assessed by nursing staff with no negative findings. He stated Resident #1 had no recollection of the incident. He stated he started in-service education on the abuse and neglect policy, sexual abuse, secured unit code, visitor sign-in process, and Visitor A being banned from the facility. He stated safe surveys were conducted with other residents and no other issues were identified. He stated Visitor A had been in the facility before with no other incidents or suspicions.

Record review of the Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, & Misappropriation Policy, dated September 2024, reflected Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. 1.

Protects residents from abuse. by anyone including but no necessarily limited to: .

Family members. visitors. Or any other individual.

The noncompliance was identified as PNC.

The noncompliance began on 05/17/26 and ended on 05/17/26.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an F-tag violation?
F-tags are federal deficiency codes used by CMS to categorize nursing home violations. Each F-tag corresponds to a specific federal regulation (42 CFR Part 483). For example, F607 relates to abuse prevention policies, F880 relates to infection control.
Were these violations corrected?
Facilities must submit plans of correction and implement changes within required timeframes. CMS conducts follow-up inspections to verify corrections. Check the inspection report for specific correction dates and follow-up verification status.
How often do nursing home inspections happen?
CMS conducts unannounced inspections of all Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes at least once per year. Additional inspections may occur based on complaints, facility-reported incidents, or follow-up to verify previous violations were corrected.
What should families do about these violations?
Families should: (1) Review the full inspection report for details, (2) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspections, (4) Compare with other facilities in Daingerfield, TX, (5) Report new concerns to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
Complete inspection reports are available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request copies directly from Capstone Healthcare of Daingerfield or from the state Department of Health. Reports include deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines.


More Reports

About This Inspection Report

Source: This inspection report was downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases nursing home inspection reports in bulk. The findings reflect what state surveyors documented in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies on the date of the inspection.

Plan of correction not included: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to their state survey agency and those responses may not appear in CMS public data at the time of release. The absence of a plan of correction in this report does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken by the facility are encouraged to contact the facility or their state survey agency directly.

Corrections may have been made: This report reflects conditions observed on the date of the survey. The facility may have implemented staffing changes, additional training, policy revisions, or other corrective actions since this report was issued. We publish what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.