Brenham Healthcare Center
Inspection Findings
F-Tag F0600
F 0600 Level of Harm - Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete
the day after she learned of the incident, she was not at the facility and the Administrator was there and the Administrator did everything. She was not aware of anyone speaking to Resident #1 about the incident except he had a head-to-toe assessment. She said a head-to-toe assessment was different than a trauma assessment. She said Resident #1 being slapped was trauma. The ADON gave instructions by telephone to
the AN to give Resident #1 the head-to-toe assessment. A head-to-toe assessment was different than a trauma assessment. In a trauma assessment, when the resident was slapped, the number one question you would ask was if the resident felt safe. She did not know if the nurse asked him that question. In a trauma assessment you would want to ask if the resident was okay. The ADON said maybe Resident #1 should have had a head to toe and trauma assessment, but she just told the AN to do a head-to-toe assessment. She said the negative effect of not doing a trauma assessment would be you do not know if he felt safe or had information about previous abuse that might have affected his behavior. There was no documentation that shows that someone asked him if he felt safe in the facility, a trauma informed assessment should have been done. She said because it was not documented did not mean that he was not asked if he felt safe but stated that nursing policy was that if it was not documented, it did not happen.
The ADON said Resident #1 was not a fluent English speaker and if he was going to understand someone
it needed to be spoken to him in Spanish. The primary way of communicating with him was using the communication binder and when the AN administered his head-to-toe assessment, she should have had
the communication binder. The ADON said that LVN A said she slapped Resident #1, and that was assault and maybe the police should have been called. She said more things should have been done and she did not know if everything was done to make sure that there was no additional abuse in the facility. She said the possible negative effect of not following the procedures in the facility abuse and neglect investigation was that they were not making sure Resident #1 was okay and they were not making sure there was not any additional abuse. The ADON said when she obtained information to contact Resident #1's RP, she should have contacted her and let her know that he was slapped by a nurse.Interview on 08/17/25 at 1:55 pm with
the facility former SW reflected she was unaware of the incident involving LVN A and Resident #1 and the Resident Safe Survey she conducted on 07/23/25 for 15 Residents were safe surveys she conducted periodically, every 1 to 2 weeks, and not associated with any specific facility incident.Interview on 08/17/2025 at 5:42 pm with the Administ[TRUNCATED]
Event ID:
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Printed: 04/13/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED
08/19/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Brenham Healthcare Center
1303 Hwy 290 E Brenham, TX 77833
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F-Tag F0610
F 0610 Level of Harm - Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete
assessment. In a trauma assessment, when the resident was slapped, the number one question you would ask was if the resident felt safe. She did not know if the nurse asked him that question. In a trauma assessment you would want to ask if the resident was okay. The ADON said maybe Resident #1 should have had a head to toe and trauma assessment, but she just told the AN to do a head-to-toe assessment.
She said the negative effect of not doing a trauma assessment would be you do not know if he felt safe or had information about previous abuse that might have affected his behavior. There was no documentation that shows that someone asked him if he felt safe in the facility, a trauma informed assessment should have been done. She said because it was not documented did not mean that he was not asked if he felt safe but stated that nursing policy was that if it was not documented, it did not happen. The ADON said Resident #1 was not a fluent English speaker and if he was going to understand someone it needed to be spoken to him
in Spanish. The primary way of communicating with him was using the communication binder and when the
AN administered his head-to-toe assessment, she should have had the communication binder. The ADON said that LVN A said she slapped Resident #1, and that was assault and maybe the police should have been called. She said more things should have been done and she did not know if everything was done to make sure that there was no additional abuse in the facility. She said the possible negative effect of not following the procedures in the facility abuse and neglect investigation was that they were not making sure Resident #1 was okay and they were not making sure there was not any additional abuse. The ADON said when obtained information to contact Resident #1's RP, she should have contacted her and let her know that he was slapped by a nurse.Interview on 08/17/25 at 1:55 pm with the [TRUNCATED]
Event ID:
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Brenham Healthcare Center in Brenham, TX inspection on recent inspection.
Found 0 violation(s). Severity: Standard violations. Status: 0 corrected, 0 pending.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is an F-tag violation?
- F-tags are federal deficiency codes used by CMS to categorize nursing home violations. Each F-tag corresponds to a specific federal regulation (42 CFR Part 483). For example, F607 relates to abuse prevention policies, F880 relates to infection control.
- Were these violations corrected?
- Facilities must submit plans of correction and implement changes within required timeframes. CMS conducts follow-up inspections to verify corrections. Check the inspection report for specific correction dates and follow-up verification status.
- How often do nursing home inspections happen?
- CMS conducts unannounced inspections of all Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes at least once per year. Additional inspections may occur based on complaints, facility-reported incidents, or follow-up to verify previous violations were corrected.
- What should families do about these violations?
- Families should: (1) Review the full inspection report for details, (2) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspections, (4) Compare with other facilities in Brenham, TX, (5) Report new concerns to state authorities.
- Where can I see the full inspection report?
- Complete inspection reports are available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request copies directly from Brenham Healthcare Center or from the state Department of Health. Reports include deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines.