Skip to main content
Complaint Investigation

Kadoka Nursing Home

May 27, 2026 · Kadoka, SD · 605 Maple St W
Citations 1
CMS Rating 4/5
Beds 31
Provider ID 43A103
Healthcare Facility
Kadoka Nursing Home
Kadoka, SD  ·  View full profile →
Source Document
Official CMS Inspection Report (Medicare.gov)
Downloaded from CMS/Medicare.gov. Reflects what state inspectors documented and does not include the facility's plan of correction, which is submitted separately. Facilities may have taken corrective actions since this report was released.
Inspection Summary

Kadoka Nursing Home in KADOKA, SD — inspection on May 27, 2026.

Found 1 citation. Severity: Standard violations.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct within required timeframes. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns and are subject to follow-up verification.

Inspection Findings

FF0657
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Observation and interview on 5/27/26 at 1:30 p.m. with resident 1 revealed that she sat in a chair near the nurses' station with her walker in front of her.

She was neatly dressed, smiling, and calm.

She felt fine, but she had a corn on her right foot.7.

Observation on 5/27/26 at 3:20 p.m. revealed resident 1 was in an activity room seated next to another resident.

Two young family members were playing nearby. At 3:30 p.m., resident 1 approached administrator A and asked her about going out to the rodeo that day. Resident 1 accepted administrator A's explanation that it was too hot to be outside that day, and the rodeo may be over.Resident 1 commented that she had been up working since 8:00 a.m. that day anyway. 8.

Interview on 5/27/26 at 1:45 p.m. with Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse D revealed she worked one day per week at the facility.

She completed residents' MDS assessments, updated resident care plans, and attended resident care conferences. MDS Nurse D acknowledged that resident 1's care plan did not address her wandering, exit-seeking, or elopement risk, even though she knew resident 1 demonstrated those behaviors. 8.

Interviews on 5/27/26 at 2:20 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. with administrator A revealed that all staff were made aware of the above FRIs regarding resident 1 after those incidents occurred.

They were reminded how wandering and exit-seeking behaviors, and elopements were expected to be managed. On 4/28/26, the facility conducted a mock elopement drill.

Administrator A stated that high winds the night of resident 1's 3/21/26 elopement may have awakened her, causing her to get out of bed and leave her room.

The resident was also being treated for a urinary tract infection, which may have increased her confusion at that time.The facility's door alarm sounded properly when it was opened by resident 1, the staff responded to that alarm as they were expected to, and reacted properly when resident 1 was not able to be accounted for. 9.

Interview on 5/27/26 at 3:30 p.m. with administrator A, MDS Nurse D, director of nursing (DON) B, assistant DON C, and RN/social services director (SSD) E revealed resident 1's sundowning (increased confusion, anxiety, agitation that peaks in the late afternoon or early evening) correlated with her wandering and exit-seeking behaviors.

The resident was more inclined to wander and exit-seek after she returned from outings with her daughter, when she showed signs and symptoms of a potential urinary tract infection, when she verbalized a desire to go home, and when she packed a bag to go home.

Interventions that were implemented when resident 1 wandered and sought out facility exits included staff supervision, limiting the resident's off-grounds outings, verbal redirection, family phone calls or visits, anticipating the resident's needs for thirst, hunger, continence care, or physical exercise, and individualized diversion activities for the resident to engage in.

The above staff acknowledged that all of the above information related to resident 1 should have been in her care plan.

Administrator A, DON B, ADON C, and RN/SSD E, in addition to MDS Nurse D, were also responsible for ensuring that resident 1's care plan was revised to reflect her individualized needs.10.

Review of the provider's revised 4/11/26 Elopement of a Resident policy revealed that following a resident elopement, The care plan should be updated with additional approaches being implemented.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an F-tag violation?
F-tags are federal deficiency codes used by CMS to categorize nursing home violations. Each F-tag corresponds to a specific federal regulation (42 CFR Part 483). For example, F607 relates to abuse prevention policies, F880 relates to infection control.
Were these violations corrected?
Facilities must submit plans of correction and implement changes within required timeframes. CMS conducts follow-up inspections to verify corrections. Check the inspection report for specific correction dates and follow-up verification status.
How often do nursing home inspections happen?
CMS conducts unannounced inspections of all Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes at least once per year. Additional inspections may occur based on complaints, facility-reported incidents, or follow-up to verify previous violations were corrected.
What should families do about these violations?
Families should: (1) Review the full inspection report for details, (2) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspections, (4) Compare with other facilities in KADOKA, SD, (5) Report new concerns to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
Complete inspection reports are available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request copies directly from Kadoka Nursing Home or from the state Department of Health. Reports include deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines.


More Reports

About This Inspection Report

Source: This inspection report was downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases nursing home inspection reports in bulk. The findings reflect what state surveyors documented in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies on the date of the inspection.

Plan of correction not included: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to their state survey agency and those responses may not appear in CMS public data at the time of release. The absence of a plan of correction in this report does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken by the facility are encouraged to contact the facility or their state survey agency directly.

Corrections may have been made: This report reflects conditions observed on the date of the survey. The facility may have implemented staffing changes, additional training, policy revisions, or other corrective actions since this report was issued. We publish what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.