Skip to main content
Advertisement
Complaint Investigation

Luxe Rehabilitation And Care Center

Inspection Date: December 31, 2025
Total Violations 2
Facility ID 365344
Location LANCASTER, OH
Advertisement

Inspection Findings

F-Tag F0842

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Harm Level: Potential for More Than Minimal Harm

F 0842 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few

FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete

for the resident not to wear depends while in bed and to cleanse the bilateral buttocks with soap and water, pat dry, and apply Triad paste every shift and as needed (prn) for incontinence. Review of an interdisciplinary team (IDT) note dated 11/10/25 at 1:26 P.M. by LPN #229 (facility's wound nurse) revealed

the IDT met in regard to Resident #135 having moisture associated skin dermatitis (MASD) to the left buttock and a pressure ulcer to the right buttock. The resident was not able to state what happened due to cognitive decline. They agreed with assisting the resident with turning and repositioning as needed and the care plan was updated. Review of Resident #135's care plans that were initiated during her stay and remained in place until her discharge from the facility on 11/18/25 revealed she had two separate care plans that both addressed her skin impairment. One care plan for the resident having an actual area of skin impairment related to her being bedbound revealed she had a Stage II (a partial thickness skin loss where

the outer layer and part of the later beneath were damaged appearing as a shallow open sore with a red or pink wound bed) and MASD to her left buttock. She had another care plan for an impaired skin integrity as evidenced by MASD to the right buttock and a Stage II pressure ulcer to the left buttock. The two care plans were contradictory or one another changing the type and the location of the resident's skin impairment.

Review of a skin grid pressure assessment dated [DATE REDACTED] revealed Resident #135's Stage II pressure ulcer to the right buttock was indicated to be present upon admission, when it was not noted until 11/09/25. It also identified the original date of the pressure ulcer as being 11/02/25, instead of 11/09/25, when it was first noted. Review of a progress note from the wound nurse practitioner the facility consulted for wound management revealed she saw Resident #135 and examined her on 11/12/25. The wound nurse practitioner erroneously identified the Stage II pressure ulcer as being on the resident's left buttock and MASD was identified as being on the right buttocks. An addendum was obtained from the wound nurse practitioner on 12/30/25 at 11:11 A.M. by the facility's Director of Nursing (DON), after it was brought to her attention that the resident's medical record included conflicting information with the type and location of the resident's skin impairment between her left and right buttock. The addendum was for a service date of 11/13/25 and clarified the pressure ulcer was on the resident's right buttock and the MASD was to the left buttock. On 12/30/25 at 11:11 A.M., an interview with LPN #229 revealed she was the facility's wound nurse and was wound certified. She was familiar with Resident #135 when the resident was residing in the facility.

She confirmed the resident developed a Stage II pressure ulcer to her right buttock and MASD to the left buttock that originated on 11/09/25. She confirmed the care plan and the wound nurse practitioner's note

on 11/13/25 had the areas reversed indicated the pressure ulcer was on the left buttock and the MASD was to the right buttock. She further confirmed the resident's wound assessments were not accurate when it indicated the Stage II pressure ulcer to the right buttock was present on admission and another area of the assessment had the date it originated as 11/02/25, when it was not noted until 11/09/25. She reported they have been having issues with the floor nurses entering the proper information on the wound assessments when it was first entered into the computer. She acknowledged the resident's medical record should accurately reflect the status of the resident's wounds, it's location, and when they originated. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 2684375.

Event ID:

Facility ID:

If continuation sheet

Printed: 04/13/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391

Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION

(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:

(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION

B. Wing

A. Building

(X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED

12/31/2025

NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER

STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE

Luxe Rehabilitation and Care Center

957 Becks Knob Road Lancaster, OH 43130

For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG

SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)

Advertisement

F-Tag F0880

Infection Control Deficiencies
Harm Level: Potential for More Than Minimal Harm

F 0880 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few

FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete

cough while they were in close proximity. She also confirmed that she did not perform hand hygiene, after

she removed her gloves, and when searching his room for the proper size of the inner cannula she needed to complete his tracheostomy care. She acknowledged removing gloves did not negate the need to perform hand hygiene before touching other environmental surfaces or supplies in the resident's room. On 12/30/25 at 2:37 P.M., an interview with RN #194 confirmed she did not perform hand hygiene, after she removed her disposable gloves, following her handling Resident #58's split gauze dressing, and before she left the room to obtain the proper size of the inner cannula LPN #170 needed to complete his tracheostomy care.

She acknowledged the removal of disposable gloves did not negate the need to perform hand hygiene

before coming in contact with environmental surfaces with her potentially contaminated hands. She further acknowledged the nurses should have donned additional PPE, other than just gloves, when providing care to the resident, since he was on EBP's. Review of the facility's policy on EBP's dated July 2024 revealed the facility would implement EBP's for eligible residents to reduce multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO's) spread. EBP required gown and gloves for specified high- contact care activities and hand hygiene at all times. Residents that required EBP's included those with indwelling medical devices and/ or chronic wounds. The staff were instructed to don gown and gloves before high-contact care. Review of the facility's hand hygiene policy dated October 2024 revealed the facility considered hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. All personnel should be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. All personnel should follow the handwashing/ hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. Use of an alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water should occur before and after handling an invasive device. It should also occur after removing gloves. The use of gloves does not replace hand washing/ hand hygiene. Integration of glove use along with routine hand hygiene was recognized as the best practice for preventing healthcare-associated infections. This deficiency represents an incidental finding of non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number

  1. 2684375. Event ID:
  2. Facility ID:

    If continuation sheet

📋 Inspection Summary

LUXE REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER in LANCASTER, OH inspection on recent inspection.

Found 0 violation(s). Severity: Standard violations. Status: 0 corrected, 0 pending.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. All deficiencies must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an F-tag violation?
F-tags are federal deficiency codes used by CMS to categorize nursing home violations. Each F-tag corresponds to a specific federal regulation (42 CFR Part 483). For example, F607 relates to abuse prevention policies, F880 relates to infection control.
Were these violations corrected?
Facilities must submit plans of correction and implement changes within required timeframes. CMS conducts follow-up inspections to verify corrections. Check the inspection report for specific correction dates and follow-up verification status.
How often do nursing home inspections happen?
CMS conducts unannounced inspections of all Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes at least once per year. Additional inspections may occur based on complaints, facility-reported incidents, or follow-up to verify previous violations were corrected.
What should families do about these violations?
Families should: (1) Review the full inspection report for details, (2) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspections, (4) Compare with other facilities in LANCASTER, OH, (5) Report new concerns to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
Complete inspection reports are available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request copies directly from LUXE REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. Reports include deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines.
« Back to Facility Page
Advertisement
Advertisement