Grand Trace Health And Rehabilitation
GRAND TRACE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION in NATCHEZ, MS — inspection on August 27, 2025.
Found 1 citation. Severity: Standard violations.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct within required timeframes. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns and are subject to follow-up verification.
Inspection Findings
he received regular reports from his Nurse Practitioner (NP) and that the resident's behaviors were in line with the signs and symptoms of her diagnosis. He confirmed that the signs and symptoms exhibited by Resident #1 were also associated with frontotemporal dementia and that usually radiographic study may reveal the differential diagnosis. He confirmed that the resident had multiple head CT scans during her residence at the facility, read by a radiologist with no noted change or addition to the diagnosis she had at the time of admission by the facility. He stated that if he had been made aware of a new diagnosis the treatment would not have changed, because the treatments are basically the same in as much as the symptoms/behaviors were targeted and treated the same. He stated that he did not believe that the resident was inappropriately placed and said that her preexisting diagnosis would have limited her appropriateness for dementia or memory care units. He stated that since the resident had been diagnosed with impaired cognition of unknown etiology, the facility care planned and provided care in the same manner to a resident who had an official dementia diagnosis. On 8/27/25 at 4:30 PM, during an interview the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Resident #1 did not have a diagnosis of dementia during her residence at the facility but did have a care planned diagnosis of impaired cognition.
She confirmed that any documentation of dementia was inaccurate.
She stated that resident diagnoses were listed in their entirety on each resident's admission record.
She confirmed that it was important for documentation to be accurate for each resident in order for staff to provide appropriate patient centered care and that inaccurate documentation could result in care for the resident that was not directed towards the needs of the resident. On 8/27/25 at 5:00 PM, during an interview the Executive Director (ED) stated that Resident #1 did not have a diagnosis of dementia during her residence at the facility but did have a care planned diagnosis of impaired cognition.
She confirmed that any documentation of dementia was inaccurate.
She confirmed that resident diagnoses were listed in their entirety on each resident's admission record.
She confirmed that it was important for documentation to be accurate for each resident in order for staff to provide patient centered care and that inaccurate documentation could result in care for the resident that was not directed towards the needs and strengths of the resident at either the facility or at other admitting facilities.
Facility ID: