Life Care Center Of Grandview
LIFE CARE CENTER OF GRANDVIEW in GRANDVIEW, MO — inspection on November 20, 2025.
Found 2 citations. Severity: Standard violations.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct within required timeframes. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns and are subject to follow-up verification.
Inspection Findings
During an interview on 10/24/25 at 11:42 A.M. the Social Services Designee said:-A staff member informed him/her that Resident #3 threw hot sauce in Resident #11's face. -He/She went with the Administrator to Resident #3's room. -They asked Resident #3 how he/she was doing. -Resident #3 responded poorly, he/she started pacing and saying that they wouldn't believe him/her anyway. -When asked when they could come back to chat and Resident #3 said, try two fucking days. -Then they went to check on Resident #11.
During an interview on 10/24/25 at 12:55 P.M. LPN C said: -Resident #3 was very protective of Resident #11.-To his/her knowledge Resident #3 did not have any known triggers that would have caused the altercations.
During an interview on 10/24/25 at 2:48 P.M. LPN D said:-Resident #3 and Resident #11 were sitting in the dining room.-He/She heard a noise and came over to the table that Resident #3 and Resident #11 were sitting at. -The table had juice and hot sauce all over it. -Resident #3 looked like he/she was going to hit Resident #11, but staff intervened in time and separated the residents. -When he/she looked at Resident #3, he/she had hot sauce all over his/her face and was afraid that it was in his/her eyes.-Resident #11 and Resident #3 normally got along just fine, but he/she never noticed them playing around or teasing each other.
During an interview on 10/27/25 at 10:47 A.M. the DON said:-He/She was not at the facility during the altercation. -It was playful teasing until it wasn't. -Resident #3 and Resident #11 were tablemates in the dining room and had no issues with each other prior to the incident.-He/She would consider the situation abuse because Resident #3 showed intent to harm Resident #11. -The altercation could not have been prevented. 2645298, 2640530, and 2551465
Facility ID:
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
A.
Building
COMPLETED
11/20/2025
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Life Care Center of Grandview
6301 East 125th St Grandview, MO 64030
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES
Review of Resident #3's admission Record showed that he/she was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM II- a complex disorder of carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism that is primarily a result of a deficiency or complete lack of insulin secretion in the pancreas or resistance to insulin).
Review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)(a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) dated 8/7/25 showed:-The resident had moderately impaired cognition.-The resident had not exhibited any behaviors within the look back period.
Review of the resident's Immediate Notice of Involuntary discharge date d 10/23/25 showed:-The resident would be forced to discharge from the facility.-The resident was being sent to a local hospital.-The safety of individuals in the facility was endangered.-The health of individuals in the facility would be otherwise endangered.-The resident was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation on 10/16/25.-The resident was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation on 10/23/25.-The resident was threatening residents and staff.Review of an emergency room Note dated 10/23/25 showed the resident was being admitted to the hospital with a primary diagnosis of Social admission Secondary to Facility Refusal for Taking Patient Back.
During an interview on 10/24/25 at 8:45 A.M. the resident said:-He/She didn't know what is going on. -No one has updated him/her on anything. -He/She felt that the Administrator just want him/her out of the facility. -He/She was really upset because he/she wanted to go back to the facility because that was his/her home.
During an interview on 10/24/25 at 11:04 A.M. the Administrator said:-The resident would not be allowed back to the facility.-He/She did not feel the facility was adequately equipped to take care of the resident.
During an interview of 10/24/25 at 11:42 A.M. the Social Services Designee (SSD) said:-He/She had sent multiple referrals to other facilities in the area after the second resident-to-resident altercation that the resident was involved in. -The facility was not equipped to handle the resident's behaviors.-He/She had sent the Ombudsman (resident advocate) the Immediate Notice of Involuntary Discharge letter on 10/23/25.
During an interview on 10/27/25 at 10:35 A.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) said:-The resident had to go. -He/She was sent to the hospital for increased behaviors and now couldn't come back to the facility. -He/She understood that the facility was not meeting regulation by not accepting the resident back, and by not providing a reevaluation after he/she received the necessary treatment. 2651315
Facility ID:
Frequently Asked Questions
More Reports
Source: This inspection report was downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases nursing home inspection reports in bulk. The findings reflect what state surveyors documented in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies on the date of the inspection.
Plan of correction not included: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to their state survey agency and those responses may not appear in CMS public data at the time of release. The absence of a plan of correction in this report does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken by the facility are encouraged to contact the facility or their state survey agency directly.
Corrections may have been made: This report reflects conditions observed on the date of the survey. The facility may have implemented staffing changes, additional training, policy revisions, or other corrective actions since this report was issued. We publish what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.