Mount Olivet Careview Home
Mount Olivet Careview Home in MINNEAPOLIS, MN — inspection on February 25, 2026.
Found 3 citations. Severity: Standard violations.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct within required timeframes. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns and are subject to follow-up verification.
Inspection Findings
the bowl of cereal in one hand and placed it on her lap. R13 picked up a spoon with the other hand and
waiting a long time for her dinner last evening and she was very hungry while she waited. R13 stated
p.m., NA-G stated breakfast was normally served about 8-8:15 a.m., lunch about noon, and dinner around 6 p.m. NA-G further stated residents should not wait more than about 15-30 minutes for their meals. If the meal was late, there were snacks that could be provided. NA-G stated staff could provide cheerios, pretzels, yogurt, or applesauce among other items, depending on the resident's diet.During interview on 2/24/26 at 2:16 p.m., NA-F stated R13 was able to eat independently at times and required assistance at times. NA-F stated she pushed R13's food away this morning since she was eating with her hands. NA-F stated R13 did appear pretty hungry this morning and therefore, probably should have let her try to eat without assistance. NA-F further stated some residents do not mind sitting in the dining room for quite a while before the meal was served.
However, if they appeared or verbalized their hunger, snacks should be provided. NA-F stated they have cookies, crackers and coffee to offer residents if they waited too long. NA-F stated those on a pureed diet could be offered pudding or applesauce and that often food or beverage could act as a good distraction while they wait.During interview on 2/24/26 at 2:50 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-C stated the goal was residents did not wait longer than 30 minutes for a meal. RN-C stated an hour and 19 minutes was too long to wait, especially when R13 was verbalizing her hunger. RN-C stated R13 should have been offered a snack or a beverage while waiting for dinner. RN-C further stated R13 should not have had her food covered and pushed out of reach at breakfast.During interview on 2/25/26 at 12:36 p.m., director of nursing (DON) stated would not expect any resident to wait over an hour for their meal. If they were in that situation, staff were expected to offer a snack or beverage. DON stated R13's dinner and breakfast should have been handled differently to promote a more dignified dining experience.Facility policy Dignity, undated, indicated, Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem.
The policy further identified residents would be supported in exercising their rights and would be provided with a dignified dining experience.
245071 02/25/2026
Mount Olivet Careview Home 5517 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55419
minimum of annual training was completed on mechanical lift transfers with the facility staff and the
been checked before the resident transfer to ensure the correct size was used to ensure a safe
stated a safety program was established with the EZ Way representatives.
Audits were completed on the function of the lift using a checklist from the manufacturer's guidelines.
Nursing assessed the appropriate sling size using the manufacturer's guidelines.
The expectation would be to follow the manufacturer's guidelines for use.
The EZ Way Sling Size Chart (form #2-150) dated 9/13/24, identified a large sling (burgundy straps) should be used for resident weight of 190 to 330 pounds and maximum distance from tailbone to base of neck of 26 inches, and medium sling size (beige straps) should be used for resident weight of 90 to 220 pounds and maximum distance from tailbone to base of neck 24 inches.A policy on mechanical lift usage was requested and was not provided.
245071 02/25/2026
Mount Olivet Careview Home 5517 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55419
During observation on 2/25/26 at 8:18 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B prepped R150's scheduled oral medications and then removed two full lidocaine 4% patches from the medication cart. LPN-B opened each of the lidocaine 4% packages and proceeded to date both patches. LPN-B grabbed the two patches along with R150's prepared oral medications and started to enter R150's room.
Surveyor questioned the full lidocaine versus half patch order. LPN-B looked in R150's electronic medication record (eMAR) and stated the order was for just half a patch on each body site. LPN-B stated he did not work with R150 that often, but he should have checked the order and provided the medication as ordered.
During interview on 2/25/26 at 12:19 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-B stated nurses were expected to administer medications as ordered by the provider.
During interview on 2/25/26 at 12:41 p.m., director of nursing (DON) stated expectation for medications to be administered per provider order and would expect staff to check the eMAR order during medication administration.
Facility policy Administration of Medications dated 12/2025, indicated appropriate medication administration procedure included, Verify the medication information as to the name of drug, strength, dose and hour of administration between the EMAR and the label on the punch card/bottle.