Kahl Home For The Aged & Infirmed
Inspection Findings
F-Tag F0658
F 0658 Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete
complete order with form, dosage, route, frequency and indication, the name of the physician or health care provider and nurse sign off of the electronic order as per the software system guidelines. 5. The physician or provider will authenticate the order within the time limit set by state regulations.6. Preferred method for provider signatures: Physician or provider should authenticate the order within Point Click Care's order portal.7. If necessary, the order may be printed out for the physician or provider to sign in wet ink within state identified time limit. If the order is signed in this manner, the actual signed order should be scanned into Point Click Care, and the order should be marked as βsigned in wet ink' in the orders portal as soon as reasonably able to be completed.8. Follow through with orders by making appropriate contact or notification (e.g., lab or pharmacy).
Event ID:
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Printed: 04/13/2026 Form Approved OMB No. 0938-0391
Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES AND PLAN OF CORRECTION
(X1) PROVIDER/SUPPLIER/CLIA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
(X2) MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION
B. Wing
A. Building
(X3) DATE SURVEY COMPLETED
12/30/2025
NAME OF PROVIDER OR SUPPLIER
STREET ADDRESS, CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
Kahl Home for the Aged & Infirmed
6701 Jersey Ridge Road Davenport, IA 52807
For information on the nursing home's plan to correct this deficiency, please contact the nursing home or the state survey agency. (X4) ID PREFIX TAG
SUMMARY STATEMENT OF DEFICIENCIES (Each deficiency must be preceded by full regulatory or LSC identifying information)
F-Tag F0880
F 0880
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Level of Harm - Minimal harm or potential for actual harm
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on
observation, clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to utilize isolation gowns when providing resident care that require the use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) in the sample. The facility reported a census of 104 residents.Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE REDACTED] identified Resident #3 as cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. The MDS list of diagnoses included pressure ulcer to the sacral region. The MDS indicated Resident #3 dependent on staff for assistance with toileting and transfers
in and out of bed/chair, and required substantial/maximal assistance with showers.Review of Resident #3 Care Plan, dated 2/12/25, the Care Plan revealed a Problem to address The resident requires enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) to reduce the spread or potential spread of multi-drug resistant organisms R/T (related to) a pressure injury. Interventions included, in part:a. Nursing staff to wear gown and gloves during wound cares. Date Initiated: 2/12/25.b. Staff are to wear gown and gloves with ADL (activities of daily living) cares such as: dressing, bathing/showering, catheter or ostomy cares, and toileting tasks including changing briefs, and toileting hygiene. Date Initiated: 2/12/25.During an observation on 12/23/25 at 1:22 PM, an Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign posted on the room of Resident #3 door. During an observation
on 12/29/25 at 11:25 AM, Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN) each wore isolation gown and gloves while they assisted Resident #3 with toileting. Staff F, CNA entered
the bathroom wearing gloves but did not wear a gown. During an interview on 12/29/25 at 1:46 PM, Staff F, CNA reported when providing cares to Resident #3, staff should be wearing a gown and gloves. She admitted she gave Resident #3 a shower earlier and took the isolation gown off afterward and forgot to put another one when she dried her back.During an interview on 12/29/25 at 2:03 PM, Staff G, LPN reported
before staff provide care for Resident #3, they should wear an isolation gown and gloves as she is on EBP.
Staff G stated Staff F, CNA should have worn an isolation gown during cares today.During an interview on 12/30/25 at 11:28 AM, the Director of Nursing reported she would expect staff to wear an isolation gown and gloves prior to providing care to Resident #3 as she is in EBP. Review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy dated 3/27/25 included, in part:a. Policy statement: It is the policy of
this home to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. b. Definitions: Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities.c. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines section: 3. Implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions b. PPE (Personal Protective Equipment, i.e gloves and gowns) for enhanced barrier precautions is only necessary when performing high-contact care activities and may not need to be donned prior to entering the resident's room. 4. High-contact care activities include: Dressing, Bathing, Transferring Providing hygiene, Changing linens, Changing briefs or assisting with toileting, Device care or use (central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, tracheostomy/ventilator tubes, hemodialysis catheters, PICC lines, midline catheters), Wound care: any skin opening requiring a dressing
Residents Affected - Few
FORM CMS-2567 (02/99) Previous Versions Obsolete
Event ID:
Facility ID:
If continuation sheet
Kahl Home for the Aged & Infirmed in Davenport, IA inspection on recent inspection.
Found 0 violation(s). Severity: Standard violations. Status: 0 corrected, 0 pending.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is an F-tag violation?
- F-tags are federal deficiency codes used by CMS to categorize nursing home violations. Each F-tag corresponds to a specific federal regulation (42 CFR Part 483). For example, F607 relates to abuse prevention policies, F880 relates to infection control.
- Were these violations corrected?
- Facilities must submit plans of correction and implement changes within required timeframes. CMS conducts follow-up inspections to verify corrections. Check the inspection report for specific correction dates and follow-up verification status.
- How often do nursing home inspections happen?
- CMS conducts unannounced inspections of all Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes at least once per year. Additional inspections may occur based on complaints, facility-reported incidents, or follow-up to verify previous violations were corrected.
- What should families do about these violations?
- Families should: (1) Review the full inspection report for details, (2) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspections, (4) Compare with other facilities in Davenport, IA, (5) Report new concerns to state authorities.
- Where can I see the full inspection report?
- Complete inspection reports are available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request copies directly from Kahl Home for the Aged & Infirmed or from the state Department of Health. Reports include deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines.