Complaint Investigation

Bruceville Terrace - D/p Snf Of Methodist Hospital

February 24, 2026 · Sacramento, CA · 8151 Bruceville Road

Citations 1

CMS Rating 4/5

Beds 171

Provider ID 555344

Healthcare Facility

Bruceville Terrace - D/p Snf Of Methodist Hospital

Sacramento, CA · View full profile →

Source Document

Official CMS Inspection Report (Medicare.gov)

Downloaded from CMS/Medicare.gov. Reflects what state inspectors documented and does not include the facility's plan of correction, which is submitted separately. Facilities may have taken corrective actions since this report was released.

Inspection Summary

BRUCEVILLE TERRACE - D/P SNF OF METHODIST HOSPITAL in SACRAMENTO, CA — inspection on February 24, 2026.

Found 1 citation. Severity: Standard violations.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct within required timeframes. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns and are subject to follow-up verification.

Inspection Findings

FF0609

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

authorities.

to the state survey agency (California Department of Public Health, CDPH) within 5 working days of

outcome of the abuse investigation, and had the potential for the abuse investigation to not be investigated thoroughly.A review of the facility's admission documents indicated Resident 1 and Resident 2 were admitted in February 2026.During a review of document titled Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse (a California mandated reporter document used to report suspected abuse or neglect of seniors (65+) or dependent adults (18-64 with disabilities)) dated 2/1/26, indicated an allegation of abuse was reported to CDPH.

Form indicated, alleged victim was Resident 1, and the alleged abuser was Resident 2.

Form indicated, Reported types of abuse (Check all that apply): Physical.

During an interview on 2/20/26, at 10:15 a.m., with Nursing Manager (NM), NM stated, we did not send the 5-day investigative report to CDPH for Resident 1 and Resident 2.During an interview on 2/20/26, at 10:17 a.m., with Executive Secretary (ES), ES stated, we had the 5-day report for Resident 1 and Resident 2 in the file to be sent, but it was never sent. ES stated, it is our policy to send the investigation report within 5 days of the incident.

During an interview on 2/24/26, at 8:02 a.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated the facility did not send the investigative report within 5 working days.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Alleged/Suspected Abuse, Resident Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property, dated 2025, the P&P indicated, It is the policy of this facility that mistreatment, neglect and abuse of residents, and misappropriation of resident property is prohibited.

All allegations of mistreatment, neglect, abandonment, isolation and verbal or physical abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property, will be reported immediately to the Administrative Director and to other officials in accordance with state law.

All alleged violations will be promptly and thoroughly investigated.10.

Results of the investigation will be documented and retained in a file, and forwarded to the appropriate reporting agencies.

Any deficiency statement ending with an asterisk (*) denotes a deficiency which the institution may be excused from correcting providing it is determined that other safeguards provide sufficient protection to the patients. (See instructions.) Except for nursing homes, the findings stated above are disclosable 90 days following the date of survey whether or not a plan of correction is provided.

For nursing homes, the above findings and plans of correction are disclosable 14 days following the date these documents are made available to the facility. If deficiencies are cited, an approved plan of correction is requisite to continued program participation.

LABORATORY DIRECTOR'S OR PROVIDER/SUPPLIER TITLE (X6) DATE REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an F-tag violation?

F-tags are federal deficiency codes used by CMS to categorize nursing home violations. Each F-tag corresponds to a specific federal regulation (42 CFR Part 483). For example, F607 relates to abuse prevention policies, F880 relates to infection control.

Were these violations corrected?

Facilities must submit plans of correction and implement changes within required timeframes. CMS conducts follow-up inspections to verify corrections. Check the inspection report for specific correction dates and follow-up verification status.

How often do nursing home inspections happen?

CMS conducts unannounced inspections of all Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes at least once per year. Additional inspections may occur based on complaints, facility-reported incidents, or follow-up to verify previous violations were corrected.

What should families do about these violations?

Families should: (1) Review the full inspection report for details, (2) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspections, (4) Compare with other facilities in SACRAMENTO, CA, (5) Report new concerns to state authorities.

Where can I see the full inspection report?

Complete inspection reports are available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request copies directly from BRUCEVILLE TERRACE - D/P SNF OF METHODIST HOSPITAL or from the state Department of Health. Reports include deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines.

More Reports

About This Inspection Report

Source: This inspection report was downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases nursing home inspection reports in bulk. The findings reflect what state surveyors documented in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies on the date of the inspection.

Plan of correction not included: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to their state survey agency and those responses may not appear in CMS public data at the time of release. The absence of a plan of correction in this report does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken by the facility are encouraged to contact the facility or their state survey agency directly.

Corrections may have been made: This report reflects conditions observed on the date of the survey. The facility may have implemented staffing changes, additional training, policy revisions, or other corrective actions since this report was issued. We publish what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.