Lodi Creek Post Acute
LODI CREEK POST ACUTE in LODI, CA — inspection on January 30, 2026.
Found 1 citation. Severity: Standard violations.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct within required timeframes. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns and are subject to follow-up verification.
Inspection Findings
During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/30/26, at 11:54 a.m., with LN 2, the facility's shower schedule was reviewed. LN 2 confirmed Resident 1 was scheduled for his showers every Sunday and Wednesday on the PM schedule. LN 2 stated the risk of not getting scheduled showers would be the potential for skin breakdown, possible pressure ulcers (localized injuries to the skin and underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence, resulting from prolonged pressure, friction, or shear) and other skin issues.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/30/26, at 12:43 p.m., with LN 3, Resident 1's EMR was reviewed. LN 3 stated Resident 1 had a known history of refusing showers. LN 3 further stated it was expected for the CNA staff to notify the LN or the treatment nurse if a resident refused the scheduled shower and to offer alternatives. LN 3 reviewed Resident 1's bathing task report from 1/1/26 to 1/30/26 and stated the CNA staff documented response not required instead of documenting refused. LN 3 verified two documented bed baths were done on 1/29/26 during the AM (morning) shift and 1/18/26 during the PM shift. LN 3 stated the expectation from CNA staff was to document refusal and not to document response not required. LN 2 further stated the CNA staff should have charted correctly in Resident 1's chart.During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/30/26, at 1:01 p.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Resident 1's bathing report for the month of January was reviewed.
The DSD confirmed Resident 1 had two documented bed baths on 1/18/26 and 1/29/26 for the month.
The DSD further confirmed Resident 1's EMR should have at least eight total showers documented for the month if he was getting them done twice a week.
The DSD stated if the resident was not scheduled for a shower then the CNA should have documented did not occur or not applicable.
The DSD further stated a resident's shower chart documentation was important for the CNA to complete.
The DSD confirmed Resident 1's shower charting for the month of January was not consistent.
The DSD stated it was very important to document in a resident's chart accurately because if it was not documented then it did not happen.
During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/30/26, at 3:57 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's bathing report for the month of January was reviewed.
The DON stated this did not meet her expectations and staff were expected to have documented appropriate responses with the correct coding.
The DON further stated it was important to have documented accurately to know what was going on with the resident.
The DON stated the risk of not documenting accurately could be the risk of missing something or for the potential of worsening of an issue that was not being tracked.
Review of an undated facility policy titled, Bath, Shower/Tub, indicated, .Purpose.The purpose of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin.Documentation .1.
The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed.5. If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason(s) why and the intervention taken.
Facility ID: