Skip to main content
Advertisement

Bear Mountain Health: Lab Test Failures - NC

The lab results for Resident #1 were drawn on September 5th and reported to Bear Mountain Health and Rehabilitation the next day. But no one called the physician assistant until September 9th — a four-day delay that violated the facility's own protocols for handling abnormal lab values.

Bear Mountain Health and Rehabilitation facility inspection

The director of nursing confirmed during a December 30th inspection interview that she normally reviewed all lab results but had been on vacation that week. She acknowledged the results should have been immediately reported to the provider, describing Resident #1's sodium as high, chloride as high, glucose as high, and white blood cells as high.

Advertisement

"The Unit Managers were supposed to cover for her and make sure everything was done while she was on vacation but there had only been one Unit Manager at the time," according to the inspection report.

The facility's administrator admitted she didn't know where the communication breakdown occurred. She confirmed that abnormal lab results should be called immediately to the provider when received from the lab, but said she wasn't sure what happened with Resident #1's critical values.

The administrator blamed staffing disruptions that week. Different nurses were working in the building who weren't the facility's typical staff and hadn't worked there for a while. She explained the facility had more agency nurses working that week who weren't their routine agency staff.

"When the DON was not there, the oversight of the labs and ensuring the provider was contacted was different," the administrator told inspectors.

The facility was also experiencing a transition in unit managers during that time, leaving only one manager to handle responsibilities normally shared between multiple supervisors.

High sodium levels can indicate dehydration or kidney problems and require immediate medical attention. Elevated glucose suggests uncontrolled diabetes, while high white blood cell counts often signal infection or other serious medical conditions requiring prompt treatment.

The four-day delay meant Resident #1 went nearly a week without appropriate medical intervention for multiple concerning lab abnormalities. During that time, the resident's condition could have deteriorated significantly without proper monitoring or treatment adjustments.

The administrator's explanation revealed a facility that failed to establish adequate backup systems for critical patient care functions. While the nursing director's vacation was presumably planned in advance, no reliable system existed to ensure life-threatening lab results would be promptly reviewed and reported in her absence.

The reliance on a single unit manager to cover multiple responsibilities during the nursing director's absence created a dangerous gap in patient safety oversight. The facility's use of unfamiliar agency nurses who hadn't worked there recently compounded the problem, as these temporary staff members were less likely to understand established protocols for handling urgent medical information.

Federal nursing home regulations require facilities to ensure physician notification of significant changes in residents' conditions. Lab results showing multiple abnormal values clearly constitute such changes and demand immediate attention regardless of staffing circumstances.

The inspection found the facility's communication systems broke down precisely when residents needed them most — during a staffing transition with unfamiliar temporary workers covering critical roles. The administrator's uncertainty about what went wrong suggests the facility lacked clear protocols for ensuring continuity of care during planned absences of key personnel.

Bear Mountain Health and Rehabilitation's failure to promptly report Resident #1's abnormal lab results demonstrates how staffing shortcuts and inadequate backup systems can compromise patient safety. The four-day delay in medical communication could have had serious consequences for a resident whose blood work indicated multiple urgent health concerns requiring immediate physician attention.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Bear Mountain Health and Rehabilitation from 2025-12-30 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 10, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

Bear Mountain Health and Rehabilitation in Asheville, NC was cited for violations during a health inspection on December 30, 2025.

The lab results for Resident #1 were drawn on September 5th and reported to Bear Mountain Health and Rehabilitation the next day.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at Bear Mountain Health and Rehabilitation?
The lab results for Resident #1 were drawn on September 5th and reported to Bear Mountain Health and Rehabilitation the next day.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in Asheville, NC, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from Bear Mountain Health and Rehabilitation or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 345010.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check Bear Mountain Health and Rehabilitation's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.