The incidents at Medicalodges Great Bend involved at least six residents, with staff describing a pattern of aggressive behavior that went unreported until one certified nursing assistant finally told administrators what she had witnessed.

CNA N described being "so overwhelmed with everything she witnessed from CNA M and trying to get everyone up for breakfast" that she only reported the incidents after she "finally got a chance to think." She told investigators she saw CNA M's behavior but waited to report it to the medication aide, who then told her to inform the administrator.
The nursing assistant who committed the abuse, identified as CNA M, was described by colleagues as chronically "aggravated with residents while assisting with cares." CNA O told investigators she would tell CNA M to stop being rude to residents, but "did not want to start anything with someone she was working with, so she just let it go."
One particularly troubling incident involved Resident 5, who "heard everything CNA M was saying about him, but he just let them continue to change him and get him ready for supper." CNA O told investigators she didn't think the resident "really understood what CNA M was saying."
CMA R, a certified medication aide, witnessed CNA M "trying to force R4 up and out of bed against his will" but failed to report it because she "thought it was an isolated incident." She later acknowledged to investigators that "she realized she should have reported it" and knew from her training on abuse, neglect and exploitation that she "needed to report any suspected abuse."
Licensed Nurse G admitted she "did not suspect abuse at the time of the occurrence, but in retrospect, she should have notified someone CNA M was having a bad day." Despite being trained in abuse recognition and knowing who to report suspected abuse to, she took no action.
The failure to report extended across multiple levels of staff. Administrative Nurse D told investigators she expected staff to report any suspected incidents "when it occurred" but acknowledged the reporting system had broken down.
During the inspection, investigators observed the affected residents in various states of vulnerability. Resident 1 sat in a wheelchair watching other residents in the dining room while waiting for lunch. Resident 2 sat at an assisted table, requiring help with eating. Resident 3 visited with tablemates from his wheelchair at a dining room table.
Resident 4 was found lying in bed after lunch, waving his hands in the air. Resident 5 sat in his wheelchair at the assisted table during lunch time, requiring staff assistance to eat. Resident 6 also needed staff help eating while seated in a wheelchair at the assisted dining room table.
Administrative Nurse D made a particularly troubling comment about the victims, telling investigators that "the good thing, if there was a good thing, was all of the residents this happened to were not alert and oriented, so even if they heard what CNA M said, they probably did not understand it."
The facility's own policy, revised in October 2022, explicitly states that residents have "the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse and involuntary seclusion." The policy commits the facility to treat each resident "with respect, kindness, dignity, and care" and to take "swift and immediate action to investigate and adjudicate alleged resident abuse and neglect."
The policy violations were extensive. Multiple staff members witnessed verbal abuse and physical force being used against vulnerable residents, yet none immediately reported these incidents through proper channels. The delay in reporting allowed the abusive behavior to continue across multiple shifts and involved multiple residents.
Federal investigators found that the facility's response came only after the incidents had already occurred over several days. The nursing assistant who eventually reported the abuse described being overwhelmed by trying to manage her own duties while witnessing the mistreatment of residents.
The pattern of unreported abuse reveals systemic failures in staff training and accountability. Despite all involved staff members receiving training on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect and exploitation, none followed through with immediate reporting when they witnessed concerning behavior.
CNA O's admission that she told the abusive nursing assistant to stop being rude but "just let it go" to avoid workplace conflict demonstrates how staff prioritized their own comfort over resident protection. Her observation that residents heard the derogatory comments but "probably did not understand" shows a troubling dismissal of the psychological impact on vulnerable individuals.
The medication aide's decision not to report what she characterized as "forcing" a resident out of bed "against his will" because she considered it an "isolated incident" reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of reporting requirements. Any instance of physical force used against a resident's will should trigger immediate investigation, regardless of whether staff believe it represents a pattern.
The licensed nurse's retrospective acknowledgment that she should have reported CNA M's "bad day" highlights how staff normalized inappropriate behavior toward residents. Describing abuse as simply having a "bad day" minimizes the serious nature of the violations and the impact on residents.
Administrative Nurse D's comment about the "good thing" being that residents were not alert enough to understand the abuse directed at them reflects a deeply problematic attitude toward resident dignity and rights. The cognitive status of residents does not diminish their right to respectful treatment or reduce the severity of abuse directed toward them.
The facility implemented corrective actions only after the abuse had been discovered and reported. All nursing staff received re-education on the abuse, neglect and exploitation policy. An emergency quality assurance meeting was held with the medical director, and an emergency resident council meeting was conducted to discuss the incidents.
The facility also contacted local police and filed a report. Social services staff planned to meet with each affected resident weekly for four weeks to assess any psychological impact from the abuse they experienced.
Federal investigators determined that due to the corrective actions completed before their onsite survey, the violations represented past noncompliance. However, the citation acknowledged the "potential psychological harm of embarrassment and humiliation" experienced by the six residents who were subjected to verbal abuse and physical force.
The case demonstrates how multiple system failures can allow abuse to continue in nursing homes when staff fail to follow reporting protocols and prioritize workplace harmony over resident protection.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Medicalodges Great Bend from 2025-12-22 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.