Royal Middletown Nursing Center failed to test new residents for COVID-19 as required during an active outbreak that began November 17, 2025, according to federal inspection records. By November 24, nineteen of the facility's 43 residents had tested positive for the virus.

The facility's infection control failures centered on two residents admitted in November 2025. Both cases revealed a pattern of ignored physician orders, delayed lab work, and unreported test results that left vulnerable residents without proper medical monitoring.
Resident #1 was admitted November 7 with multiple health conditions including a history of urinary tract infections and COVID-19. A physician ordered lab work on November 10, but staff never completed the tests.
Four days later, on November 14, different lab work revealed a positive urinary tract infection. Staff didn't review those critical results until November 17 — three days after they came back — when the resident was rushed to the hospital with shortness of breath, blood in their urostomy, and problems with their medical tubing.
The resident remained hospitalized as of November 24, according to inspection records.
During the entire 10-day admission, staff never tested the resident for COVID-19 despite facility policy requiring tests on admission, day two, and day four for all new residents. This happened while the facility was experiencing an active outbreak.
"Every resident should be tested for Covid on admission, on day two, and on day four," Registered Nurse Staff A told inspectors on November 24. She acknowledged that Resident #1 "had not been tested for Covid-19 at all while admitted to the facility."
She also confirmed that the November 10 labs were never completed as ordered and that the positive infection results from November 14 were never reported to a physician.
The facility's Infection Preventionist provided similar admissions during her interview. She acknowledged that the urinary tract infection results "were not viewed by any facility staff until 11/17/2025, the day the resident was sent to the hospital." No provider was notified of the results and no treatment interventions were started.
A second resident admitted in November faced similar testing failures. Resident #2 arrived with a history of urinary tract infections and muscle weakness. A care plan dated November 19 specifically called for monitoring lab results as ordered due to a UTI.
That same day, a physician ordered a urine culture and sensitivity test. Staff never completed it.
Instead, they performed different lab work on November 14 without any physician's order. The results showed abnormal values, but no physician was notified. The originally ordered urine test was never done.
Like the first resident, Resident #2 was never tested for COVID-19 on admission or day two as required by facility policy. The resident tested positive for COVID-19 on November 21.
Registered Nurse Staff B told inspectors on November 25 that "all new admissions are tested for Covid-19 on admission, day two, and day four." She acknowledged that Resident #2 "had not been tested on admission or on day two, as ordered."
She could not provide evidence of a physician's order for the November 14 lab work or proof that a provider had been notified of the abnormal results. The originally ordered urine culture "still had not been obtained, as ordered," she admitted.
The Director of Nursing Services confirmed the outbreak timeline during her November 25 interview. The COVID-19 outbreak began November 17 — the same day Resident #1 was hospitalized — and infected 19 of the facility's 43 residents by November 24.
She indicated that she "would expect physician's orders to be followed, as ordered, and that labs would be completed and reported to a provider."
The facility's Medical Director told inspectors she relies on nursing staff to notify her of lab results. "She does not review results unless the facility notifies her," according to inspection records.
She expected physician's orders to be completed as ordered and wanted nurses to document when providers are notified of important results.
The inspection found that Royal Middletown's failures in laboratory testing and follow-up resulted in delayed care. For Resident #1, those delays contributed to hospitalization that could have been prevented with timely treatment of the urinary tract infection identified in lab results that sat unreviewed for three days.
The facility operates with 43 residents in a state where nursing home oversight has intensified following pandemic-related deaths. The November inspection was conducted in response to complaints about the facility's care practices.
Federal inspectors classified the violation as causing "actual harm" to residents, a serious finding that can trigger monetary penalties and increased monitoring by state health officials.
The outbreak at Royal Middletown represents nearly half of its resident population testing positive for COVID-19 in a single week, while the facility simultaneously failed to follow its own testing protocols for newly admitted residents who were most vulnerable to exposure.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Royal Middletown Nursing Center from 2025-11-25 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.