Resident 104 depends entirely on staff for feeding due to quadriplegia, spinal stenosis, and hand contractures from a previous stroke. He scored 15 out of 15 on cognitive assessments, meaning he was fully aware of the substandard meal service on December 15.
Lunch trays arrived on Unit 1 at 12:10 PM. Staff removed the first tray from the cart at 12:14 PM, but Resident 104, housed in the last room on the right side of the hallway, didn't receive his meal until 12:43 PM.
Inspectors measured temperatures on a test tray delivered at the same time. The fish registered 118.6 degrees. Noodles reached 122.8 degrees. Zucchini and tomatoes measured 120.0 degrees.
"It was warm at best, but it was not good to eat at that temperature," Resident 104 told inspectors at 12:52 PM, shortly after receiving his lukewarm meal.
The dietary manager didn't dispute the temperature readings when confronted by inspectors. "No, the food should be warmer," she said. "I get a lot of complaints about food temperatures. The staff do not deliver them to residents quickly enough."
Her admission revealed a systemic problem beyond a single cold meal. Staff routinely fail to deliver food promptly, allowing temperatures to drop while trays sit in carts.
The facility's own policy requires food "delivered promptly to assure safe, palatable and high-quality food served at the proper temperature." The policy specifically states food must be "served at preferable temperatures as discerned by the patients/residents and customary practice."
For Resident 104, who cannot feed himself and relies completely on staff assistance, the cold meal represented more than an inconvenience. His comprehensive care plan from August 2024 documents his total dependence for all activities of daily living, including eating.
The resident was admitted with multiple serious conditions. Beyond quadriplegia and spinal stenosis, his medical record includes a transient ischemic attack, commonly called a mini-stroke. His quarterly assessment from October showed no cognitive impairment, meaning he fully understood the poor quality of care he received.
Federal regulations require nursing homes to serve food at safe and appetizing temperatures. The 118.6-degree fish served to Resident 104 fell short of both standards.
Inspectors notified facility leadership on December 17, two days after documenting the violation. Administrator, director of nursing, and two assistant directors of nursing were informed of the temperature failures.
The dietary manager's acknowledgment that staff complaints about food temperatures are common suggests the December 15 incident wasn't isolated. Her statement that "staff do not deliver them to residents quickly enough" indicates a workflow problem that affects multiple residents regularly.
Resident 104's experience illustrates how operational failures compound for the facility's most vulnerable patients. Unable to walk, dress, bathe, or feed himself, he depends entirely on staff timing and attention for basic needs like a warm meal.
The inspection found few residents affected by this specific violation, but the dietary manager's comments about frequent temperature complaints suggest broader meal service problems throughout the facility.
No additional information was provided before inspectors completed their review, leaving unresolved questions about how long temperature problems have persisted and what steps management planned to ensure proper meal delivery timing.
Resident 104 remains dependent on the same staff who delivered his cold lunch after a 33-minute delay.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Westport Rehabilitation and Nursing Center from 2025-10-22 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Westport Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
- Browse all VA nursing home inspections