Skip to main content

Bethany Home Association: Notification Failure - KS

Healthcare Facility
Bethany Home Association
Lindsborg, KS  ·  5/5 stars

Inspectors from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services visited the facility on September 2, 2025, following a complaint. What they found was a gap in communication that the facility's own administrative nurse said should never have happened, and a change-of-condition policy the facility could not produce when asked.

The resident, identified in inspection records only as Resident 1, had two diagnoses that made the delay particularly significant. She had suffered a cerebral infarction, the sudden death of brain cells caused by blocked or ruptured blood flow to the brain. She also had thrombophilia, a blood disorder that makes blood in both veins and arteries more prone to clotting. For a person carrying both of those diagnoses, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and a sudden inability to transfer or cut food are not routine complaints. They are the kinds of symptoms that can signal something going wrong in the brain or the blood.

Her cognition was already compromised. A formal mental status assessment conducted earlier in the year placed her score at nine, a range that indicates moderately impaired cognition. She used a walker and needed supervision to transfer and to walk even short distances. Her care plan, updated in early August 2025, called for limited one-staff assistance with mobility in her room. She was not a resident who could be expected to advocate loudly for herself or to call her own family and describe what she was experiencing.

On the night of July 12, 2025, a nurse documented observing Resident 1 with vomiting and diarrhea throughout the day. Staff gave her Maalox and two tablets of Imodium and noted what they had done. What the record did not contain, inspectors found, was any documentation that anyone had picked up the phone and called her representative. Not that night. Not the next morning.

The weekend passed.

By July 14, a nurse's note described what had been a rough weekend, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea continuing and Resident 1 having a hard time transferring. The note recorded that she had slept in, taken her morning medications, and made it to lunch, where she ate some of her meal. Staff checked her vital signs and found them within normal limits. The nurse assessed her hand grip and found it equal on both sides. But the note also recorded something that should have sharpened the urgency: Resident 1 was having a hard time cutting up her meat.

That detail mattered. A woman with a stroke history who is suddenly struggling with fine motor tasks in her hands is presenting a clinical picture that warrants immediate attention, and immediate family notification. Instead, the nurse's note from July 14 documented that the physician and Resident 1's representative were notified that day, three days after the first documented change in her condition.

Three days.

Administrative Nurse D, identified in inspection records by that designation, reviewed the clinical record with inspectors on the morning of September 2 and confirmed what they had found. There was no documentation showing that Resident 1's representative had been notified on July 12, when the vomiting and diarrhea were first observed. The administrative nurse said she would expect staff to notify the representative as soon as Resident 1 had nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. She did not dispute the gap. She verified it.

The facility could not provide a change-of-condition policy when inspectors asked for one.

That absence matters for a specific reason. When a facility has no written policy guiding how and when staff are supposed to notify families of a change in condition, there is no internal standard against which staff behavior can be measured, corrected, or trained. It means that whether a nurse calls a family in the first hour or the third day may depend entirely on individual judgment, individual habit, or individual workload on a given shift. For residents like Resident 1, who cannot fully advocate for themselves, that gap in policy is not an administrative technicality. It is the mechanism by which three days can pass without anyone being accountable for the silence.

The inspection covered a facility with 75 residents. Only three were included in the sample reviewed during this complaint investigation, and Resident 1 was the one flagged for a change-of-condition review. The deficiency was cited at a level of minimal harm or potential for actual harm, affecting few residents. That classification reflects the regulatory framework inspectors use, not a clinical judgment about what might have unfolded differently if her representative had been reached on the night of July 12 instead of the afternoon of July 14.

What her representative could have done with that call is not recorded in the inspection report, because the inspection report documents what happened, not what might have. Her representative might have asked questions that prompted an earlier physician call. Might have requested a hospital evaluation. Might have done nothing differently than what staff eventually did. The inspection record does not say.

What it does say is that Resident 1 had a stroke history, a clotting disorder, moderately impaired cognition, and a new inability to cut her food, and the person designated to make decisions on her behalf was not told for three days.

Bethany Home Association is located at 321 North Chestnut Street in Lindsborg, a small city in central Kansas. The inspection was completed September 2, 2025. The deficiency was documented on a standard CMS Form 2567.

The facility's plan of correction is not included in the inspection narrative provided to inspectors. Residents and families seeking information about the facility's response are directed to contact the facility or the Kansas state survey agency directly.

Resident 1's representative eventually learned what had happened to her over that weekend. Whether they learned it in time to change anything, the record does not say.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Bethany Home Association from 2025-09-02 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Download the official CMS inspection PDF from Medicare.gov

Additional Resources

Editorial Standards & Data Disclosure

Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.

Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.

Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.

Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.

Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.

Last verified: September 22, 2026  ·  Our methodology

Quick Answer

BETHANY HOME ASSOCIATION in LINDSBORG, KS was cited for violations during a health inspection on September 2, 2025.

Inspectors from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services visited the facility on September 2, 2025, following a complaint.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at BETHANY HOME ASSOCIATION?
Inspectors from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services visited the facility on September 2, 2025, following a complaint.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in LINDSBORG, KS, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from BETHANY HOME ASSOCIATION or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 175507.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check BETHANY HOME ASSOCIATION's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.