St. Helena Parish Nursing Home: Sex Offender Care Failures - LA
Three months later, on August 1, 2025, an incident occurred between that resident and another.
The resident, identified in inspection records as Resident #2, had been living at the facility since early 2025. His diagnoses included Bipolar Disorder and Depression. He was also a registered sex offender. So was at least one other resident at the facility, identified as Resident #3. According to the Director of Nursing, the facility did not know either man was a registered sex offender until after the August incident.
Resident #2's care plan, created in February 2025, documented that he masturbated excessively, stayed completely naked in his room at all times, and made sexual comments toward staff. The plan called for staff to explain why the behavior was inappropriate and to intervene to protect others.
By May, that wasn't enough. CNAs told supervisors the behavior was getting worse.
On May 15, 2025, a new intervention was added to his care plan: notify the facility's Intensive Outpatient Program about the increase in inappropriate sexual behavior. The next day, the care plan coordinator sent an email to the social worker. "S2DON said she wants S12NP to look at Resident #2," the email read, "because the CNAs are saying he's progressively getting worse and worse about making inappropriate sexual comments towards them."
The psychiatric nurse practitioner, identified in records as S12NP, was never contacted.
When inspectors interviewed him on August 27, 2025, he said he had no idea Resident #2's behavior had become a problem in May. "If Resident #2's behaviors had become a problem," he said, "he would have expected staff to notify him." His last documented evaluation of Resident #2 was January 16, 2025, more than seven months before the incident.
The care plan coordinator told inspectors the May intervention was the social worker's responsibility to carry out. She said she didn't know whether it ever happened. The administrator told inspectors the social worker was on vacation and couldn't be reached.
The Director of Nursing confirmed to inspectors that the psychiatric provider was never notified of the escalating behavior, and that he should have been.
She also said something that underscored how much the facility's response had been shaped by what it didn't know. If she had been aware Resident #2 was a registered sex offender from the start, she said, she would have been more aggressive about initiating interventions, which could have made staff more alert to his behavior. The care plan coordinator said the same thing about Resident #3: if she had known he was a registered sex offender, she would have care planned for it before anything happened.
The inspection was triggered by a complaint and completed August 28, 2025. Inspectors found the deficiency caused minimal harm or the potential for actual harm, and noted it affected some residents.
What the record shows is a gap that stretched across months. A man with a documented history of escalating sexual behavior, living in a facility that housed other vulnerable residents, went without psychiatric review from January through at least August. The mechanism to get him that review existed on paper. The email flagging the problem was sent. The responsibility was assigned.
Nobody followed through. And the person most positioned to intervene, the psychiatric nurse practitioner who treated him, spent those months not knowing there was anything to intervene on.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for St. Helena Parish Nursing Home from 2025-08-28 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Download the official CMS inspection PDF from Medicare.gov
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: September 22, 2026 · Our methodology
St. Helena Parish Nursing Home in Greensburg, LA was cited for violations during a health inspection on August 28, 2025.
Three months later, on August 1, 2025, an incident occurred between that resident and another.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.