Critical Pressure Ulcer Care Deficiencies
The inspection revealed that nursing staff failed to properly care for a resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer on the sacral region. Stage 4 pressure ulcers represent the most severe category of pressure injuries, involving full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle.
Federal surveyors observed multiple instances where the resident was not positioned according to the facility's established turning schedule. On February 11, 2025, at 9:08 a.m., inspectors found the resident lying on her left side when the posted schedule indicated she should be positioned on her right side. The following day, the resident remained on her back when she should have been positioned on her left side.
Medical Significance of Proper Positioning
Pressure ulcers develop when sustained pressure reduces blood flow to tissue, causing cell death and tissue breakdown. For residents with existing pressure ulcers, proper positioning every two hours is essential to prevent further tissue damage and promote healing. The affected resident's care plan specifically required turning and repositioning every two hours to redistribute weight and reduce skin breakdown risk.
When pressure ulcers reach stage 4 severity, they extend through all layers of skin and into underlying muscle, tendon, or bone. Without proper pressure relief, these wounds can worsen, leading to complications including bone infection (osteomyelitis), sepsis, or death.
Documentation and Communication Failures
The inspection revealed significant gaps in documentation and staff communication regarding the resident's care. Nursing staff documented turning the resident but failed to record which position she was placed in, making it impossible to verify proper rotation of positions.
On February 12, 2025, when a Certified Nursing Assistant claimed the resident had refused to turn, the resident directly contradicted this statement, telling inspectors she had not refused positioning care. Neither the CNA nor the Licensed Vocational Nurse documented this alleged refusal or the reason for it, as required by facility policy.
Industry Standards for Pressure Ulcer Prevention
Professional standards require that residents at risk for pressure ulcers be repositioned at least every two hours when bedbound. For residents with existing pressure ulcers, this schedule may be inadequate, requiring more frequent positioning changes. The facility's own policy stated that for residents with stage 1 or higher pressure ulcers, a two-hour repositioning schedule is insufficient.
Proper documentation serves multiple purposes: ensuring continuity of care between shifts, providing legal protection for the facility, and enabling quality improvement efforts. The facility's repositioning policy required staff to document the specific position in which residents were placed and report any care refusals to supervisors.
Medication Safety Violations
Inspectors identified serious medication administration errors involving insulin injection site rotation for multiple diabetic residents. Two residents received insulin injections in the same body locations repeatedly, violating physician orders and manufacturer guidelines requiring site rotation.
For one resident, inspection records showed insulin injections administered in the same abdominal quadrant on consecutive days. This practice increases the risk of lipodystrophy (tissue changes causing pitted or thickened skin) and localized cutaneous amyloidosis (skin lumps), which can affect insulin absorption and blood sugar control.
Diabetes Management Standards
Proper insulin administration requires rotating injection sites to prevent tissue damage and ensure consistent medication absorption. The facility's own policy required rotating sites "preferably within the same general area" and staff had access to previous injection site information through their electronic medication records.
Manufacturer guidelines for both types of insulin used by affected residents specifically warn against using the same injection spot repeatedly and recommend changing injection sites with each dose to reduce complications.
Fall Prevention and Safety Hazards
The inspection documented safety hazards that increased fall risk for residents. In one case, a resident's bilateral fall mats had furniture placed on top of them, potentially causing injury if the resident fell onto the hard objects.
Additional safety concerns included improper placement of fall mats, leaving gaps where residents could fall directly onto the floor rather than the protective cushioning. A Registered Nurse confirmed these placement errors could result in "major injury such as fractures or lacerations" if residents fell.
Fall Risk Assessment Inadequacies
For another resident with a history of falls, facility staff failed to conduct required interdisciplinary team meetings following fall incidents and provided inaccurate fall risk assessments. One assessment gave a resident a fall risk score of 4 following a fall, when the score should have been higher due to the recent incident history.
Respiratory and Medical Equipment Violations
The facility failed to follow infection control protocols for respiratory equipment. Inspectors found unlabeled suction canisters, oxygen tubing touching the floor, and nebulizer equipment stored improperly without proper identification.
These practices create infection risks for vulnerable residents with respiratory conditions. The facility's policy required labeling all respiratory equipment with dates and changing components every seven days to prevent bacterial growth.
Controlled Substance Management Issues
Pharmaceutical oversight violations included inadequate controlled substance accountability. Staff failed to reconcile emergency medication kits containing controlled substances at every shift change and lacked proper signatures on accountability logs for controlled substances awaiting disposal.
These deficiencies increase the risk of medication diversion and could result in residents receiving incorrect medication doses or having access to harmful substances.
Systemic Care Failures
The violations represent systemic failures in nursing supervision, staff training, and quality assurance. Multiple departments demonstrated knowledge of proper procedures but failed to implement them consistently.
The facility's Director of Nursing acknowledged most violations during interviews, indicating staff understood requirements but lacked effective oversight systems to ensure compliance. This pattern suggests inadequate quality monitoring and accountability measures.
Regulatory Response
Federal regulations require nursing homes to provide services that meet professional standards of quality and ensure residents receive treatments and care according to professional standards of practice. The identified violations represent failures to meet these fundamental requirements.
The inspection findings will require the facility to develop and implement corrective action plans addressing each deficiency area. Continued violations could result in additional penalties, including potential loss of Medicare and Medicaid funding.
Santa Clarita Post-Acute Care Center must demonstrate sustained compliance with federal care standards to ensure resident safety and quality of care. The facility has an opportunity to correct these deficiencies and implement systems preventing their recurrence.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Santa Clarita Post-acute Care Center from 2025-02-14 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
💬 Join the Discussion
Comments are moderated. Please keep discussions respectful and relevant to nursing home care quality.