GREELEY, CO - The Center at Centerplace faced serious federal citations during a February 2025 inspection after investigators found the facility failed to provide adequate quality care, resulting in a resident's death from gastrointestinal bleeding.

Critical Breakdown in Emergency Medical Response
The most serious violation documented by federal inspectors involved the facility's failure to transfer a resident to the hospital when medical intervention was clearly indicated. This breakdown in clinical judgment and emergency response protocols directly contributed to a resident's death from a gastrointestinal bleed, a condition that typically requires immediate hospital-level care for proper management and potential life-saving interventions.
Gastrointestinal bleeding represents a medical emergency that can rapidly become life-threatening without proper intervention. The condition requires immediate assessment, blood work monitoring, potential blood transfusions, endoscopic procedures, and intensive monitoring capabilities that are only available in hospital settings. When nursing facilities fail to recognize the severity of such conditions or delay appropriate transfers, residents face significantly increased mortality risks.
The inspection findings indicate that facility staff either failed to recognize the severity of the resident's condition or made inappropriate decisions regarding the need for hospital-level care. This type of clinical failure represents one of the most serious breakdowns in nursing home care, as it directly impacts resident survival and violates fundamental healthcare principles of timely intervention.
Leadership Awareness and Communication Failures
Federal investigators documented significant gaps in communication and awareness among the facility's leadership team regarding quality of care issues. The medical director, who serves as the clinical leader responsible for overseeing resident care standards, reported being unaware of the quality of care failure that resulted in the resident's death.
During interviews conducted on February 12, 2025, the medical director stated he had not been informed about the immediate jeopardy situation and was unaware of broader quality of care problems related to anticoagulant monitoring, care plan development, and obtaining proper consents for anticoagulant medications. This lack of awareness among senior clinical leadership suggests systemic communication breakdowns that can compromise patient safety across the facility.
The medical director acknowledged that while previous administrators may have discussed these issues in the past, they had not been adequately addressed in recent Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meetings. This gap in ongoing quality oversight represents a critical failure in the facility's responsibility to maintain continuous monitoring and improvement of care standards.
The facility's nursing home administrator, who began working at the facility in October 2024, confirmed that QAPI committee meetings occurred monthly and included all departments. However, the timing of his arrival and the documented quality failures suggest that systemic issues predated his tenure and highlight the challenges of ensuring care continuity during leadership transitions.
Systemic Quality Assurance Deficiencies
The inspection revealed broader deficiencies in the facility's quality assurance and performance improvement systems. These systems are designed to identify potential problems before they result in serious harm to residents and ensure that care meets federal standards and medical best practices.
QAPI programs in nursing facilities should function as comprehensive quality monitoring systems that track clinical outcomes, identify trends in care issues, and implement corrective actions before problems escalate. The failure to adequately monitor and address quality of care issues suggests that the facility's QAPI system was not functioning effectively to protect resident safety.
Federal regulations require nursing facilities to maintain robust quality assurance programs that include regular review of clinical outcomes, mortality cases, emergency transfers, and medication management practices. When these systems fail to identify and address problems with hospital transfer decisions and anticoagulant monitoring, residents face increased risks of preventable complications and deaths.
The medical director's acknowledgment of frustration with high staff turnover rates provides important context for understanding how operational challenges can impact clinical care quality. High turnover in healthcare settings has been consistently linked to increased medical errors, communication breakdowns, and compromised care continuity.
Medical Protocol Standards and Requirements
Proper management of residents on anticoagulant medications requires specific protocols and monitoring procedures that appear to have been inadequately implemented at this facility. Anticoagulants, which prevent blood clotting, require careful monitoring because they can increase bleeding risks while providing essential protection against stroke and blood clots.
Healthcare facilities must maintain detailed care plans for residents receiving anticoagulant therapy, including regular blood work monitoring, assessment protocols for bleeding signs, and clear guidelines for when emergency interventions are required. The inspection findings suggest these protocols were not adequately developed or followed.
When residents on anticoagulant medications develop gastrointestinal bleeding, healthcare providers must immediately assess the severity, consider medication adjustments, and determine whether hospital-level intervention is required. This decision-making process requires clinical expertise and should involve clear protocols that ensure appropriate and timely responses.
Federal standards require nursing facilities to obtain proper informed consent for anticoagulant medications, ensuring that residents and their families understand both the benefits and risks of these treatments. The documented failures in consent processes suggest broader deficiencies in medication management and resident communication practices.
Additional Issues Identified
The inspection also documented concerns about staff turnover and its impact on care quality. The medical director specifically cited high turnover rates among both clinical staff and facility leadership as factors affecting the facility's ability to maintain consistent, high-quality care for residents.
Leadership transitions appeared to have contributed to gaps in quality oversight, with the current nursing home administrator having started in October 2024 and previous quality issues not being adequately addressed in recent QAPI meetings. These operational challenges highlight the importance of maintaining robust quality systems that function effectively regardless of staffing changes.
The facility's approach to QAPI meetings included pre-meeting preparation sessions and participation from all departments, suggesting some structural elements were in place for quality monitoring. However, the documented failures indicate that these processes were not sufficient to prevent serious quality of care breakdowns.
Moving forward, facility leadership committed to enhancing QAPI discussions to include more focused attention on change of condition documentation and hospital transfer decision-making processes, recognizing the need for improved clinical oversight and decision-making protocols.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Center At Centerplace, LLC, The from 2025-02-13 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
💬 Join the Discussion
Comments are moderated. Please keep discussions respectful and relevant to nursing home care quality.