Skip to main content
D1 — Desktop Banner (728×90)
M1 — Mobile Banner (320×50)

Medilodge of Marshall: Failed Assault Investigation - MI

Healthcare Facility
Medilodge Of Marshall
Marshall, MI  ·  1/5 stars

The incident between Resident 3 and Resident 6 occurred on January 28, 2026. It wasn't discovered by inspectors through a routine survey. A complaint brought them in. What they found when they arrived in May was a facility that had acknowledged something serious happened between two of its residents and then done almost nothing required of it afterward.

The administrator, identified in inspection records only as NHA A, laid out for inspectors exactly what a proper investigation should have looked like: resident statements, witness statements, a complete incident report, notification of guardians and responsible parties, notification of the attending physician, an initial report to the state, police notification, a root cause determination, a pain assessment, a skin assessment, a follow-up physician visit, a psychological services referral, a medication review, social work follow-through, and an updated care plan.

D2 — Square Left (300×250)
D3 — Square Right (300×250)
M2 — Mobile Square (300×250)

That list came from NHA A himself. He confirmed to inspectors that the facility had met almost none of it.

Police were never contacted. The investigation was never completed. When inspectors pressed him on why, NHA A said he could not explain it.

M3 — Mobile Square (300×250)

That answer, or the absence of one, is at the center of what inspectors documented at Medilodge of Marshall. The facility knew what was required. The administrator could recite it from memory. And the residents involved in the altercation went weeks and then months without the follow-through that the facility's own leadership said should have happened.

Resident-to-resident altercations in nursing homes carry particular weight because of what they signal about supervision, environment, and the safety of people who cannot simply leave. When an incident like this occurs, the steps NHA A described exist for reasons that are not bureaucratic. Pain assessments catch injuries that residents cannot or do not report. Skin assessments document bruising and wounds that might otherwise go unrecorded. Psychological services address trauma in people who are already vulnerable. Police notification creates an external record and, depending on what occurred, can trigger a criminal investigation that the facility itself cannot conduct.

None of that happened here. The inspection report, completed May 28, 2026, rated the harm level as minimal or potential for actual harm and noted that few residents were affected. But the regulatory category captures the floor, not the ceiling, of what an incomplete investigation leaves unknown. When a facility never finishes looking into what happened, the actual harm to the people involved remains, by definition, undetermined.

Medilodge of Marshall sits on East Michigan Avenue in Marshall, a small city in Calhoun County. The facility is enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid, meaning it operates under federal oversight and the inspection findings become part of its public record through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

The inspection was triggered by a complaint, which means someone, a resident, a family member, a staff member, or an outside party, contacted authorities because they believed something had gone wrong and wasn't being handled. The complaint process exists precisely for situations like this one, where internal accountability has broken down and the people most affected have no other recourse.

What Resident 3 and Resident 6 experienced on January 28, and in the months that followed while the facility's investigation sat unfinished, is not fully knowable from the inspection record. Their injuries, if any, were never formally assessed in the way NHA A himself said they should have been. Their psychological state was never evaluated by the services he said should have been called in. Whether either of them needed something different from their care plan, something the altercation might have revealed, was never determined, because the review was never done.

The administrator confirmed all of this. He offered no explanation for it.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Medilodge of Marshall from 2026-05-28 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

Editorial Standards & Data Disclosure

Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.

Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.

Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.

Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.

Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.

Last verified: August 11, 2026  ·  Our methodology

Quick Answer

Medilodge of Marshall in Marshall, MI was cited for violations during a health inspection on May 28, 2026.

The incident between Resident 3 and Resident 6 occurred on January 28, 2026.

Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at Medilodge of Marshall?
The incident between Resident 3 and Resident 6 occurred on January 28, 2026.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in Marshall, MI, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from Medilodge of Marshall or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 235495.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check Medilodge of Marshall's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.


D6 — Desktop Banner (728×90)
M6 — Mobile Banner (320×50)