Accel at Crystal Park: Discharge Planning Failures - OK
That resident, identified in inspection records as Resident #11, told an inspector on May 27 that they had received some information about which medications to continue, but had no idea when they were leaving or what time until the moment it happened. No discharge planning meeting had been held. No written discharge plan had been provided. The social services director, when asked about it the following morning, explained the omission by saying the resident simply hadn't been at the facility long enough to warrant a formal meeting.
Resident #11 had been admitted on April 2 with a fractured left femur, atherosclerotic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, and hypersomnia. They were discharged ten days later, on April 12.
The social services director told the inspector that notes about planning conversations did exist, but they were not in the medical record. Copies had not been given to the resident or their family. The notes were kept somewhere, by someone, and went nowhere.
The second resident, Resident #5, arrived at the facility on March 11 carrying a list of diagnoses that read like a cascade of organ failure: acute systolic and diastolic heart failure, type 2 diabetes, acute kidney failure, end-stage renal disease, and dependence on dialysis. A discharge planning document dated March 18 was found in the record, but it was incomplete. Goals were blank. The names of participating team members were blank. The planning section itself was blank. Resident #5 was discharged on April 14.
The Director of Nursing told the inspector that the discharge planning form was supposed to be completed by the full interdisciplinary team and filed in the medical record. When asked whether either resident or their family had received a copy, the DON said they didn't know. There was no documentation in the electronic medical record either way.
The facility's own discharge planning policy, dated April 2024, spelled out the requirements clearly. Social services was to review the plan with the resident and family before discharge. A copy was to go to the resident. A copy was to be filed in the chart. None of that happened for Resident #11. For Resident #5, a form existed but was left largely empty.
The Director of Nursing also told inspectors that 188 residents had been discharged from the facility in the previous 90 days.
The inspection was triggered by a complaint and conducted on May 28. CMS rated the harm level as minimal. That rating reflects the regulatory classification, not necessarily what it felt like to be a dialysis-dependent patient discharged without a completed plan, or to be a person with a broken femur who spent their last day at the facility waiting, without knowing they were waiting, to be told it was time to go.
Resident #11 didn't know they were going home until they were told to find a ride.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Accel At Crystal Park from 2026-05-28 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: August 8, 2026 · Our methodology
Accel At Crystal Park in Oklahoma City, OK was cited for violations during a health inspection on May 28, 2026.
No discharge planning meeting had been held.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.