Patterson Healthcare Center: Medication Docs Failures - LA
The inspection, triggered by a complaint and conducted on May 27, 2026, focused on whether the facility accurately recorded medication administration. Out of three residents reviewed, one had a documentation record that didn't hold up.
The resident, identified in the report only as Resident 1, had a physician's order for Miconazole 2% cream, a topical antifungal, to be applied twice daily. The order ran from April 29, 2026 through May 9, 2026. But the electronic Treatment Administration Record told a more complicated story.
The April record showed the cream was scheduled starting April 20 in the evening, more than a week before the order's official start date. Two of those April doses, the evening of April 20 and the evening of April 30, had no documentation at all.
The May record was worse. Of the doses scheduled between May 1 and May 9, six went unrecorded: the mornings of May 2 and May 3, the evenings of May 4, May 5, May 7, and May 8. That's six out of roughly seventeen scheduled doses in a nine-day window, with no notation that anyone had applied the medication.
When inspectors interviewed the Director of Nursing on May 26 at 2:36 in the afternoon, the explanation was straightforward. The medication was administered as ordered, the director said. It just wasn't documented on those dates. It should have been.
That answer closes one question and opens another. In nursing home care, documentation isn't a formality that runs parallel to treatment. It's how anyone, the next nurse on shift, the physician reviewing the treatment course, a family member asking how things are going, knows what actually happened. When doses go unrecorded, the gap in the record is indistinguishable from a dose that was skipped. Nobody reading the chart the following morning would know whether the evening application happened or not.
Miconazole cream treats fungal infections of the skin, including conditions like ringworm and certain types of rashes common in residents who spend extended time in bed or in close contact with moisture. A two-week twice-daily course is a standard short-term treatment. Whether missing documentation in this case meant the resident's infection went undertreated, or was treated correctly but just not written down, the inspection report doesn't resolve. The Director of Nursing said it was the latter.
CMS rated the harm level as minimal, meaning inspectors found no evidence the resident suffered a serious consequence from the documentation failures. The deficiency affected few residents, with only one of three reviewed showing the problem.
But the pattern across the record is hard to explain as a simple clerical slip. The undocumented doses weren't clustered on a single bad night or a single shift change. They were scattered across two separate months, across both the morning and evening administrations, across the first days of the order and the final days before it ended. That's not one person forgetting once. That's a documentation habit that didn't hold across multiple staff members or multiple shifts over the course of a treatment.
The facility did not dispute the findings. The Director of Nursing acknowledged the documentation should have happened and didn't.
For Resident 1, the treatment course is over. The order ended May 9. Whether the infection resolved the way it was supposed to, whether the full course was completed as the Director of Nursing said, the record as written doesn't confirm it.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Patterson Healthcare Center from 2026-05-27 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: This article is based on inspection data downloaded directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) via Medicare.gov. CMS releases inspection reports in bulk; we publish the findings as documented by state surveyors in the official Form CMS-2567 Statement of Deficiencies.
Plan of correction: The CMS report we receive does not include the facility's plan of correction. Facilities submit plans of correction separately to state survey agencies and those responses may not be reflected in CMS data at the time of publication. The absence of a plan of correction in our data does not mean one was not filed. Readers who want information about corrective steps taken are encouraged to contact the facility directly or their state survey agency.
Corrections may have occurred: Inspection reports reflect conditions observed on the date of the survey. Facilities may have implemented corrections, staffing changes, additional training, or other remediation since the report was issued. We report what CMS provides and encourage readers to seek current information from the facility.
Editorial process: Inspection findings are extracted from CMS source documents and synthesized using AI, reviewed for factual accuracy against the original report by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: August 12, 2026 · Our methodology
Patterson Healthcare Center in Patterson, LA was cited for violations during a health inspection on May 27, 2026.
The inspection, triggered by a complaint and conducted on May 27, 2026, focused on whether the facility accurately recorded medication administration.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.