Skip to main content
Advertisement

Halstead Health: Catheter Tubing Secured Wrong - KS

The 83-year-old man with Alzheimer's disease and severe cognitive impairment had the surgically-inserted catheter tube draining urine through his abdominal wall. His urologist had ordered staff never to remove the device.

Halstead Health and Rehabilitation Center facility inspection

On April 14, Licensed Nurse H cleaned the catheter site on the resident's abdomen, then attached the stabilization device to his left upper thigh. The next morning, Licensed Nurse I repeated the same incorrect procedure, securing the tubing from the abdomen to the thigh rather than keeping it anchored to the abdominal area.

Advertisement

Both nurses violated basic catheter care standards. Suprapubic catheters must be secured to the abdomen to prevent pulling that could dislodge the tube or cause internal injury.

When questioned, Licensed Nurse H admitted ignorance about proper placement. "They were unaware of a Stat-lock being adhered to the abdomen and would ask the Administrative Nurse D for directions," according to the inspection report.

Administrative Nurse D initially defended the leg placement, telling inspectors she "would expect the Stat-lock to be anchored to the leg." But when confronted with the facility's own training materials, she backtracked completely.

The facility's suprapubic catheter competency checklist clearly states that tubing "should be secured to the abdomen." Administrative Nurse D admitted she had reviewed this checklist multiple times but somehow missed the requirement.

"Administrative Nurse D stated they were unaware the competency checklist required the tubing to be anchored to the abdomen the previous times they reviewed the checklist," inspectors wrote.

The resident's complex medical history made proper catheter care critical. His electronic medical record documented chronic kidney disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, obstructive uropathy, and urinary retention. These conditions had already compromised his urinary system's function.

His cognitive assessment scored just four out of 15 points, indicating severely impaired mental status that left him unable to communicate discomfort or problems with his catheter.

The facility's own care plan, dating to August 2023, included specific instructions for catheter maintenance. Staff were directed to apply liquid skin barrier before attaching the stabilization device. Yet this detailed care planning apparently never addressed the fundamental question of where to secure the tubing.

The nursing staff's confusion extended beyond individual mistakes. Administrative Nurse D acknowledged that the facility's catheter policy contained no guidance about Stat-lock placement for suprapubic catheters, creating a dangerous gap between written procedures and actual practice.

This policy gap persisted even as the facility maintained a competency checklist that did specify abdominal anchoring. The disconnect between training materials and daily practice protocols left nurses guessing about critical safety procedures.

Federal inspectors found the improper anchoring created risk of catheter dislodgement, which could cause serious complications including internal bleeding, infection, or the need for emergency surgical replacement.

The resident had lived with his suprapubic catheter since at least December 2025, when care assessments documented his indwelling device. For months, staff may have been securing his catheter incorrectly, creating ongoing risk each time they performed routine maintenance.

The inspection revealed a facility where supervisory nurses either didn't know their own training requirements or failed to ensure frontline staff followed them. Administrative Nurse D's admission that she had repeatedly reviewed the competency checklist without noticing the abdominal anchoring requirement suggests systemic oversight failures.

The resident's family had trusted the facility to provide specialized care for his complex medical needs. Instead, staff repeatedly performed a basic procedure incorrectly, potentially endangering a vulnerable man who couldn't advocate for himself.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Halstead Health and Rehabilitation Center from 2026-04-15 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: June 12, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

HALSTEAD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER in HALSTEAD, KS was cited for violations during a health inspection on April 15, 2026.

His urologist had ordered staff never to remove the device.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at HALSTEAD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER?
His urologist had ordered staff never to remove the device.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in HALSTEAD, KS, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from HALSTEAD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 175446.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check HALSTEAD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.
Years of Screaming: Van Duyn Center and the Community That Could Not Get Anyone to Listen
Featured Investigation

Years of Screaming: Van Duyn Center and the Community That Could Not Get Anyone to Listen

Sandra Young came to Van Duyn Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing to get better. She had just lost a leg. The plan was rehabilitation, then home. She never left.

Read the Full Story → May 31, 2026