Regent Park Rehab: Patient Rights Violations - KS
Federal inspectors documented the gap between what Regent Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare recorded and what they actually saw during a February 2026 inspection. The facility, at 10604 East 13th Street N in Wichita, serves 61 residents. Inspectors reviewed one resident for range of motion concerns. That resident was enough.
The woman, identified in inspection records only as Resident 49, had suffered a stroke that left her with weakness and paralysis on the left side of her body. Her left hand had developed increased muscle tone, a warning sign that the joint was moving toward contracture — the permanent, abnormal fixation of a joint or muscle that can leave a limb locked in position and cause chronic pain. She was cognitively intact, scoring a 13 out of 15 on a standardized mental status assessment, meaning she understood her situation and could describe her own care.
A therapist had evaluated her back in October 2025 and found she did not yet have a full contracture, but the risk was real. Her left arm was completely flaccid, weak and without the muscle resistance that might otherwise slow the process. The therapist provided a resting hand splint — inspectors later learned it was fashioned from a pool noodle with a strap — and noted that staff could also use a rolled-up hand towel if the splint wasn't available. A physician's order, entered September 26, 2025, directed staff to place a clean, dry, rolled washcloth between her fingers and palm every day shift and every night shift. Her care plan said the same thing. The goal was straightforward: keep the hand from closing on itself permanently.
For four and a half months, the medication administration record showed it was done. Every day. Every night. No refusals noted. No gaps in documentation.
On February 9, 2026, at 10:00 in the morning, inspectors found Resident 49 sitting at the dining room table in her wheelchair. A padded tray was attached to the chair. Her left arm was not on it. Her hand hung down in a loose fist, swollen, with nothing in it.
The next afternoon, February 10 at 2:00 PM, she was in bed with the head elevated. Her left elbow rested on a pillow, her hand dangling off the edge. Swollen. Loose fist. No rolled cloth. No splint. Nothing.
An hour later, at 3:03 PM, an inspector spoke with her directly. She said she worked with therapy and that they had given her something to wear on her hand — a pool noodle with a strap, she described it, meant to keep it in place and prevent her hand from contracting further. She knew what it was for. She knew she was supposed to be wearing it. When asked where it was, she indicated across the room. The inspector looked. It was on her dresser.
She said she should be wearing it at that time.
The therapist who had originally evaluated her, identified in inspection records as Consultant Staff GG, spoke with inspectors that same afternoon. He confirmed he had assessed her in early October 2025 at a provider's request, found elevated tone rather than a fixed contracture, and provided the resting hand splint as a preventive measure. He was direct about the stakes: her arm was completely flaccid, which increased the risk for contractures. The splint or the rolled towel existed precisely because of that risk.
A licensed nurse, identified as LN H, told inspectors the following morning that nurses were responsible for placing the towel or splint in Resident 49's hand and confirmed it should be there all the time. She said nurses verified and documented its placement on the medication administration record.
The administrative nurse, identified as Administrative Nurse D, said she expected the nurse to place the splint on the resident's hand to prevent contractures and to document it correctly.
The documentation said it was happening. The inspectors saw, on two separate days, that it was not.
This is the specific problem with paper compliance in nursing home care. A medication administration record showing no gaps, no refusals, no missed shifts creates the appearance of consistent care. It satisfies audits. It reassures families who request records. It tells a story that, in this case, was not true. Resident 49 could tell inspectors herself what was supposed to happen and what wasn't happening. Not every resident in her situation can do that.
Contractures are not a minor inconvenience. Once a joint fixes in an abnormal position, the change is often permanent. The hand closes. The fingers curl into the palm. Skin breakdown can develop in the creases where the fingers press. Pain becomes chronic. Function that might have been preserved through consistent, simple intervention — a rolled washcloth, a foam splint — is gone. The therapist who evaluated Resident 49 in October 2025 found she did not yet have a contracture. He found tone, resistance, risk. The intervention he recommended was not complicated. It did not require specialized equipment or advanced training. It required someone, on every day shift and every night shift, to place something in her hand.
The inspection found that did not happen, at minimum, across the two days inspectors were present to observe. The records covering September 26, 2025 through February 11, 2026 — more than four months of shifts — showed no breaks in compliance. What inspectors found when they walked into the room told a different story.
Inspectors rated the violation at a level of minimal harm or potential for actual harm, meaning they did not document that Resident 49 had suffered a contracture as a direct result of the missed care during the inspection period. The therapist had found elevated tone, not a fixed contracture, when he evaluated her in October. Whether that remained true by February, the inspection report does not say.
What the report does say is that on February 10, 2026, at 3:03 in the afternoon, a woman who had survived a stroke and understood exactly what she needed looked across her room at the device sitting on her dresser and told an inspector she should be wearing it right then.
Nobody had put it on her.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Regent Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare from 2026-02-11 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
Data source: Official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
Editorial process: AI-synthesized regulatory data, reviewed for accuracy by our editorial team.
Professional review: All content reviewed by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal.
Last verified: August 4, 2026 · Our methodology
REGENT PARK REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE in WICHITA, KS was cited for violations during a health inspection on February 11, 2026.
The facility, at 10604 East 13th Street N in Wichita, serves 61 residents.
Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.