Skip to main content
Advertisement

South Valley Post Acute: Safety Hazards Found - CO

CNA #5 attempted to move Resident #2 from bed to wheelchair alone, even though the resident's care plan had been revised to require two-person transfers after a fall. The assistant had no knowledge of the updated requirement.

South Valley Post Acute Rehabilitation facility inspection

"The resident looked wobbly and weak, so she attempted to sit Resident #2 on the bed," CNA #5 told inspectors during a January interview. "She said the resident was seated on the edge and had to be assisted to the ground."

Advertisement

The resident was wearing non-slip socks and a gait belt during the transfer attempt. CNA #5 said Resident #2 "usually required one-person staff assistance to transfer," unaware that protocols had changed.

The breakdown occurred because updated care plan interventions were never transcribed to CNA tasks. Staff remained uninformed of critical safety changes implemented after the resident's previous fall.

The Director of Nursing confirmed the communication failure during multiple interviews with inspectors. "CNA #5 did not know Resident #2 became a two-person assist with transfers," the DON said. "The new intervention that was implemented after Resident #2's fall of the resident becoming a two person transfer was not transcribed onto the CNA tasks, which led to CNA #5's lack of knowledge of the resident's current transfer status."

Federal inspectors found the facility failed to ensure proper implementation of fall prevention interventions. The care plan revision requiring two-person assistance had been initiated following the resident's previous fall, but critical information never reached direct care staff.

The DON described proper fall response protocols during her interview. "When a fall was sustained by a resident, the staff should try to determine the root cause of the fall with an IDT approach," she said. "The initial response should include making sure the resident was safe and could access their call light."

She acknowledged that care plans should be updated when new interventions are implemented. After Resident #2's fall, the facility revised the fall care plan with new interventions, including the two-person transfer requirement.

However, the DON was unable to determine whether a two-person transfer had occurred at the time of the fall that prompted the care plan revision.

The inspection revealed a systematic communication breakdown between clinical decision-making and direct care implementation. While administrators updated care plans with appropriate safety interventions, they failed to ensure frontline staff received the information necessary to carry out those interventions.

CNA #5's description of the transfer attempt highlighted the resident's physical instability. The assistant recognized the resident appeared "wobbly and weak" but proceeded with a single-person transfer, unaware that facility protocols now required additional assistance.

The resident ultimately had to be "assisted to the ground" during the failed transfer attempt, despite wearing appropriate safety equipment including non-slip socks and a gait belt.

Federal regulations require nursing homes to implement care plan interventions designed to prevent avoidable accidents and maintain resident safety. The failure to communicate updated transfer requirements to direct care staff undermined these safety measures.

The inspection found that some residents were affected by the facility's failure to properly implement two-person assistance for transfers. The violation carried a determination of minimal harm or potential for actual harm.

South Valley Post Acute Rehabilitation's breakdown in communication left vulnerable residents at risk during transfers, with nursing assistants operating under outdated protocols while administrators believed new safety measures were in place.

The facility's inability to bridge the gap between care plan revisions and daily care tasks exposed residents to preventable risks during routine activities like transfers from bed to wheelchair.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for South Valley Post Acute Rehabilitation from 2026-01-29 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

SOUTH VALLEY POST ACUTE REHABILITATION in DENVER, CO was cited for violations during a health inspection on January 29, 2026.

The assistant had no knowledge of the updated requirement.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at SOUTH VALLEY POST ACUTE REHABILITATION?
The assistant had no knowledge of the updated requirement.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in DENVER, CO, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from SOUTH VALLEY POST ACUTE REHABILITATION or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 065230.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check SOUTH VALLEY POST ACUTE REHABILITATION's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.