Skip to main content
Advertisement

Regency at Westland: Care Planning Failures - MI

Healthcare Facility:

The resident, identified as R148 in inspection records, told federal investigators that staff at Regency at Westland sometimes forgot to provide basic colostomy care. When reminded, they would empty or change the bag, but the oversight created a pattern of neglect for someone who couldn't perform the task independently.

Regency At Westland facility inspection

R148 was admitted to the facility on January 24 with colostomy status and diverticulitis. The resident scored 11 out of 15 on a cognitive assessment, indicating impaired mental function, and required staff assistance with basic movements like getting out of bed and transferring to chairs.

Advertisement

Despite these clear care needs, the facility failed to establish proper protocols.

When inspectors reviewed R148's medical records, they found no physician's orders for colostomy care. The Treatment Administration Record, which should document all care provided, contained no entries about colostomy maintenance. Five days after admission, the resident was left to remind staff when the medical device needed attention.

The oversight represents a fundamental breakdown in admission procedures. Unit Manager V told inspectors that admitting nurses should enter orders for devices like colostomies when new residents arrive. The manager acknowledged conducting chart audits to catch missing orders, but this system failed R148.

Director of Nursing couldn't explain the gap. When questioned about why colostomy care orders weren't entered on admission, the nursing director stated uncertainty about the cause. The director noted that unit managers perform chart audits and double-check orders after new admissions, yet R148's essential care requirements slipped through multiple review points.

The facility's own policies provided no guidance. Inspectors found that Regency at Westland's colostomy policy failed to address actual colostomy care procedures, leaving staff without clear protocols for this medical necessity.

R148's experience illustrates the human impact of these systemic failures. Living with a colostomy requires regular emptying and cleaning to prevent infection, skin breakdown, and the psychological distress of accidents. When staff forget these tasks, residents face physical discomfort and the indignity of having to advocate for basic medical care.

The resident's report that the bag nearly burst reveals how severe the neglect became. Colostomy bags have capacity limits, and overfilling risks spillage that can cause skin irritation, infection, and embarrassment. That staff expressed surprise at the bag's fullness suggests they weren't monitoring it appropriately.

Federal regulations require nursing homes to provide necessary medical services, including ostomy care for residents who need it. The citation found the facility failed this standard for R148, though inspectors noted the violation caused minimal harm or potential for actual harm.

The case raises questions about care coordination at Regency at Westland. Multiple staff members and managers are involved in admission processes, chart reviews, and daily care delivery. Yet none ensured that a resident with an obvious medical device received appropriate attention.

R148's cognitive impairment made the oversight particularly concerning. The resident couldn't independently manage colostomy care and had to rely on memory and communication skills that were already compromised. When staff forgot their responsibilities, R148 bore the consequences.

The inspection occurred after a complaint was filed about the facility's care practices. Federal investigators spent time observing operations and interviewing staff, ultimately documenting the colostomy care failure as part of their findings.

For R148, the violation meant living with uncertainty about when essential medical care would be provided. The resident learned to speak up when the colostomy bag needed attention, taking on a burden that should have been the facility's responsibility from the moment of admission.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Regency At Westland from 2026-01-29 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: April 19, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

Regency at Westland in Westland, MI was cited for violations during a health inspection on January 29, 2026.

When reminded, they would empty or change the bag, but the oversight created a pattern of neglect for someone who couldn't perform the task independently.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at Regency at Westland?
When reminded, they would empty or change the bag, but the oversight created a pattern of neglect for someone who couldn't perform the task independently.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in Westland, MI, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from Regency at Westland or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 235655.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check Regency at Westland's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.