Skip to main content
Advertisement

Griffith Park Healthcare: Infection Control Lapses - CA

The resident, who suffers from chronic respiratory failure and obstructive pulmonary disease, requires continuous oxygen at 5 liters per minute through nasal tubing. Federal inspectors found the facility's infection control failures put the patient at increased risk during a January complaint investigation.

Griffith Park Healthcare Center facility inspection

When inspectors examined the resident's room on January 28, they discovered oxygen tubing with no date marking whatsoever. The resident's breathing nebulizer tubing was dated January 5 — meaning it had gone 23 days without replacement when facility policy required weekly changes.

Advertisement

A Licensed Vocational Nurse told inspectors that oxygen tubing "must be dated to ensure staff know when to change the tubing next." But this resident's tubing carried no such marking.

The registered nurse on duty acknowledged the failures directly. "The oxygen tubing was not labeled and should be labeled weekly to ensure the tubing was changed to prevent infection," the RN told inspectors. She confirmed the nebulizer tubing dated January 5 "should have been changed since not changing the nebulizer tubing would increase the risk of infection."

The RN calculated that the nebulizer equipment should have been replaced by January 19 under the facility's seven-day policy. Instead, it remained in use nearly a week past that deadline.

"There was no way to know when the tubing's were last changed since there was no date or documentation to indicate when Resident 1's oxygen tubing was changed," the registered nurse admitted to inspectors.

The resident, admitted in August with multiple respiratory conditions, is cognitively intact and capable of understanding their medical situation. They require moderate assistance with daily activities like personal hygiene and dressing, making them dependent on staff to maintain their breathing equipment properly.

Federal inspectors found the facility violated its own written policies on respiratory therapy equipment. The facility's Oxygen Administration policy from October 2010 requires staff to document the date and time oxygen setup procedures are performed in the resident's medical record. No such documentation existed for this resident.

The facility's Respiratory Therapy policy from November 2011 specifically mandates changing oxygen cannula and tubing every seven days "or as needed" and documenting when respiratory therapy is performed. Staff failed on both requirements.

Breathing equipment that goes unchanged beyond recommended timeframes can harbor bacteria and other pathogens, particularly dangerous for residents with compromised respiratory systems. The resident's chronic respiratory failure means their lungs already struggle to get adequate oxygen — contaminated equipment compounds that medical vulnerability.

The nebulizer device converts liquid medication into fine mist for inhalation, making it a direct pathway to the resident's respiratory system. Equipment that should have been sterile and fresh was instead weeks old, creating what inspectors termed "potential to increase the risk and spread of infections."

Despite the facility having detailed written procedures for respiratory equipment maintenance, staff demonstrated they either didn't follow the policies or failed to understand their importance. The registered nurse's acknowledgment that unchanged tubing increases infection risk suggests awareness of the medical consequences, making the oversight more concerning.

The inspection found these failures affected few residents, but for those impacted, the stakes were significant. Respiratory patients depend on clean, properly maintained equipment for every breath.

Staff couldn't provide basic information about when critical medical equipment was last changed, leaving inspectors — and presumably the resident — unable to determine how long contaminated tubing had been in use. The complete absence of documentation meant no accountability system existed to prevent similar lapses.

The resident continues requiring continuous oxygen support for their chronic respiratory failure, now relying on a facility that demonstrated it cannot consistently maintain the basic infection control measures their breathing equipment demands.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Griffith Park Healthcare Center from 2026-01-29 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 7, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

GRIFFITH PARK HEALTHCARE CENTER in GLENDALE, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on January 29, 2026.

Federal inspectors found the facility's infection control failures put the patient at increased risk during a January complaint investigation.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at GRIFFITH PARK HEALTHCARE CENTER?
Federal inspectors found the facility's infection control failures put the patient at increased risk during a January complaint investigation.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in GLENDALE, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from GRIFFITH PARK HEALTHCARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 056111.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check GRIFFITH PARK HEALTHCARE CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.