Federal inspectors found that Cottonwood Nursing and Rehabilitation failed to serve food at safe temperatures to 37 of 39 residents during a January complaint investigation. The facility's dietary manager admitted she rarely monitored kitchen staff and couldn't produce temperature logs for the day inspectors arrived.
Resident #2, who serves as Resident Council President, told inspectors on January 29 that she and other residents had been complaining about cold food at every meal for the past six months. She said she had provided this feedback directly to the dietary manager.
The main concern was always the same. The food was cold.
When inspectors asked the dietary manager to provide test trays of regular, mechanical, and pureed diets at 12:30 PM, the food was lukewarm. The dietary manager acknowledged she only sometimes checked to ensure cooks were monitoring food temperatures, not regularly. She received temperature logs from cooks at the end of each day but wasn't present when temperatures were actually taken.
She knew the consequences. If food was too cold, residents wouldn't want to eat and would lose weight.
The dietary manager couldn't provide temperature logs for breakfast and lunch served on January 29 — the day inspectors were conducting their investigation.
Kitchen staff member [NAME] C, who had worked at the facility for four months, told inspectors he usually checked food temperature when removing it from the stove. The food was well over the required 165 degrees at that point. But no one verified his temperature readings, and he simply turned in the information at the end of his shift.
Nobody had instructed him when to check temperatures.
The outgoing administrator learned about the cold food complaint during the inspection. She spoke with the dietary manager and discovered the warming plate was malfunctioning. They would get it repaired, she promised. She said she would ensure kitchen staff checked food temperatures before serving meals to residents.
She claimed she had never received feedback about cold food before.
The incoming administrator, interviewed the same day, said she had been made aware of the temperature problems by both the outgoing administrator and dietary manager. The facility was in the process of training kitchen staff on proper food temperatures and getting operational warming plates.
The inspection revealed a systematic breakdown in food safety monitoring. Kitchen staff prepared food at proper temperatures but had no oversight for maintaining those temperatures during service. The dietary manager collected paperwork but didn't verify actual practices. Equipment failures went unaddressed for months.
Residents experienced the consequences daily. Every meal arrived lukewarm or cold, despite months of complaints through official channels. The Resident Council President's repeated feedback to the dietary manager produced no meaningful changes.
The facility's own policy stated that residents have a right to dignified existence and self-determination. Cold food served meal after meal for six months while equipment remained broken contradicted those principles.
Federal inspectors found the facility's temperature logbook contained no entries for breakfast and lunch on January 29. The absence of documentation matched the dietary manager's admission that she didn't regularly monitor temperature-taking practices.
Kitchen staff operated without clear guidance on when to check temperatures beyond the initial cooking phase. The cook who spoke with inspectors had worked there four months without receiving instructions on temperature monitoring protocols during food service.
The violation affected nearly every resident receiving regular meals. Of 39 residents on regular, mechanical, or pureed diets, 37 experienced the temperature failures. Only residents on specialized diets avoided the problem.
Inspectors classified the violation as causing minimal harm or potential for actual harm. But the dietary manager's own statement revealed the real risk: residents who won't eat cold food face unhealthy weight loss.
The Resident Council President continued advocating for basic food safety standards that other residents couldn't achieve on their own. Her six months of complaints documented a facility's indifference to fundamental care standards until federal inspectors arrived to investigate.
Full Inspection Report
The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Cottonwood Nursing and Rehabilitation from 2026-01-29 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.
Additional Resources
- View all inspection reports for Cottonwood Nursing and Rehabilitation
- Browse all TX nursing home inspections