Skip to main content
Advertisement

Lakewood Healthcare: Fall Injuries from Poor Safety - CA

Healthcare Facility:

The December 22 incident at Lakewood Healthcare Center occurred when CNA 4 was escorting Resident 6 to the restroom. The nursing aide positioned herself ahead of the resident instead of beside her, violating the facility's own safety protocols and the resident's documented care requirements.

Lakewood Healthcare Center facility inspection

Resident 6 had been readmitted to the facility on December 23 at 6:10 a.m. with intact sutures on her right forehead, showing no bleeding or swelling. Her skin check documented seven sutures from the injury.

Advertisement

The resident's physical therapy notes from December 17 painted a clear picture of her vulnerabilities. She exhibited anxiety with activity and required encouragement to participate in treatment. Most critically, supervision or touching assistance was required when she walked even ten feet.

CNA 4 described the events leading to the fall during an interview with inspectors. She said Resident 6 was restless on December 22 and kept trying to get out of bed. The aide placed her chair outside the resident's room to monitor and assist if needed.

When Resident 6 got out of bed, CNA 4 approached and asked if she needed the restroom. The aide knew the resident "did not like to be touched or held" and decided to walk in front of her while leading the way to the bathroom.

"She reached for the door to the restroom and when she turned around Resident 6 lost her balance and was unable to catch her," according to the inspection report. Because she was walking ahead of the resident, CNA 4 couldn't see how Resident 6 lost her balance.

The facility's Director of Rehab explained that supervision or touching assistance meant Resident 6 required physical or verbal cues for safety when walking. Optimal safety precautions required staff to walk next to or slightly behind the resident, not in front.

"This precaution would allow the staff member to quickly react and assist Resident 6 if she became unsteady," the director told inspectors.

The Director of Nursing confirmed that when residents need supervision or touch assistance, staff are responsible for cueing, guiding, and redirecting as needed. She said CNA 4 should have walked next to Resident 6, which would have provided visual supervision to steady the resident when she became unbalanced.

Walking beside the resident "could have minimized Resident 6's injury and/or prevented Resident 6's fall," the nursing director acknowledged.

The facility's own ambulation policy, revised in 2012, explicitly required staff to observe correct guarding by standing on the resident's weakest side and just slightly behind. Staff were instructed to use their other hand to support the resident's shoulder or hip if needed.

The policy stated that proper ambulation techniques "are utilized to increase safety for the resident and staff."

Federal inspectors found the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. The violation affected few residents but created minimal harm or potential for actual harm.

The incident highlighted a fundamental breakdown in following established safety protocols. Despite clear documentation that Resident 6 required touch assistance when walking, and despite facility policies mandating proper positioning during ambulation, the nursing assistant chose to walk ahead of the vulnerable resident.

Resident 6's physical therapy records showed she had exhibited self-limiting behavior and anxiety with activity just five days before the fall. The combination of her documented need for assistance and her psychological state made proper positioning by staff even more critical.

The nursing assistant's decision to walk in front of the resident, rather than beside or slightly behind her, eliminated any chance of preventing the fall once Resident 6 became unsteady. By the time CNA 4 turned around at the restroom door, the resident was already losing her balance.

The seven sutures required to close the forehead laceration served as a visible reminder of what happens when staff fail to follow basic safety protocols designed to protect vulnerable residents.

Full Inspection Report

The details above represent a summary of key findings. View the complete inspection report for Lakewood Healthcare Center from 2025-12-31 including all violations, facility responses, and corrective action plans.

Additional Resources

🏥 Editorial Standards & Professional Oversight

Data Source: This report is based on official federal inspection data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Editorial Process: Content generated using AI (Claude) to synthesize complex regulatory data, then reviewed and verified for accuracy by our editorial team.

Professional Review: All content undergoes standards and compliance oversight by Christopher F. Nesbitt, Sr., NH EMT & BU-trained Paralegal, using professional regulatory data auditing protocols.

Medical Perspective: As emergency medical professionals, we understand how nursing home violations can escalate to health emergencies requiring ambulance transport. This analysis contextualizes regulatory findings within real-world patient safety implications.

Last verified: May 6, 2026 | Learn more about our methodology

📋 Quick Answer

LAKEWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER in DOWNEY, CA was cited for violations during a health inspection on December 31, 2025.

The December 22 incident at Lakewood Healthcare Center occurred when CNA 4 was escorting Resident 6 to the restroom.

What this means: Health inspections identify deficiencies that facilities must correct. Violations range from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the full report below for specific details and facility response.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened at LAKEWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER?
The December 22 incident at Lakewood Healthcare Center occurred when CNA 4 was escorting Resident 6 to the restroom.
How serious are these violations?
Violation severity varies from minor documentation issues to serious safety concerns. Review the inspection report for specific deficiency codes and scope. All violations must be corrected within required timeframes and are subject to follow-up verification inspections.
What should families do?
Families should: (1) Ask facility administration about specific corrective actions taken, (2) Request to see the follow-up inspection report verifying corrections, (3) Check if this represents a pattern by reviewing prior inspection reports, (4) Compare this facility's ratings with other nursing homes in DOWNEY, CA, (5) Report any new concerns directly to state authorities.
Where can I see the full inspection report?
The complete inspection report is available on Medicare.gov's Care Compare website (www.medicare.gov/care-compare). You can also request a copy directly from LAKEWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER or from the state Department of Health. The report includes specific deficiency codes, facility responses, and correction timelines. This facility's federal provider number is 555099.
Has this facility had violations before?
To check LAKEWOOD HEALTHCARE CENTER's history, visit Medicare.gov's Care Compare and review their inspection history, quality ratings, and staffing levels. Look for patterns of repeated violations, especially in critical areas like abuse prevention, medication management, infection control, and resident safety.